Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 1997 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Apocarbonic anhydrase-enzymatic determination of zinc in fruit juices

Pages
162–166
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, the enzymatic method that we have developed is a variable means of determining.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a new enzymatic method for determining trace amount of zinc was employed on ten different fruit juices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The basis of the enzymatic method is that apocarbonic anhydrase regains its activity in proportion to the $Zn^{2+}$ existing in a solution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, the enzymatic method that we have developed is a variable means of determining.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, a new enzymatic method for determining trace amount of zinc was employed on ten different fruit juices. The basis of the enzymatic method is that apocarbonic anhydrase regains its activity in proportion to the $Zn^{2+}$ existing in a solution. Thus, the more activated the enzyme is in the medium, the higher the $Zn^{2+}$ concentration in the solution will be. For this purpose, bovine carbonic anhydrase was purified from erythrocyte hemolisate by affinity chromatography. The $Zn^{2+}$ bound to the enzyme was removed by of the purified enzyme against the solution of pyridine-2-6-dicarboxylic acid. Thus 100% purified enzyme was obtained. First, the presence of $Zn^{2+}$ in the fruit juices sample was determined by the enzymatic method. Then the content of $Zn^{2+}$ in the same sample was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. According to the results obtained, the enzymatic method that we have developed is a variable means of determining.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÖLGE, A., DEMİR, Y., DEMİR, N., KÜFREVİOĞLU, İ. (2022). Apocarbonic anhydrase-enzymatic determination of zinc in fruit juices. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 162–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/602595

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. G.G. Guiltbault, Enzymatic Methods of Analysis. Pergamon Press, Oxford., 1970
  2. M.M. Fishman and H.E. Schifl, Arial Chem., 48, 322-333 (1976)
  3. P. Lehky and E.A. Stein, Arial. Chim. Acta., 70, 85-87 (1974)
  4. K. Kashiwabara, T. Hobo, E. Kobayashi and S. Suzuki, Ana1. Chim. Acta., 178 209-215 (1985)
  5. J.E. Coleman, G.L. ed., Eichborn, Acad. Sei., 4Z9, 26-48 (1984)
  6. K. Kobayashi, K. Fujiwara, H. Karaguchi, K. Fuwa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 54,2700-2704 (1981)
  7. Ö.Y. Küfrevioglu, E.E. Keha, Doga TU Kim. D., 12, 214-221 (1988)
  8. N. demir. Ö.Y. Küfrevioglu, E.E. Keha, E. Bakan, Biofactors, 4, 129-133 (1993)
  9. P.L. Whitney, Arial Biochem, 57, 467-476 (1974)
  10. J.B. Hunt, M J. Rhee, C.B. Storm, Arial Biochem., 76, 614-617 (1977)
  11. U.K. Laemmli, Nature, London, 277, 680 (1970)
  12. K.M. Wilbur, N.G. Anderson, S. Biol. Chem., 176, 147-154 (1948)
  13. E.E. Rickly S.A.S. Ghazanfer, B.A. Gibbons, J.T. Edsall, 3. Biol. Chem., Z39, 1065-1078 (1964)
  14. J.A. Verpoorte, S. Mehta, J.T. Edsall, S. Binl. Chem., 242, 4221-4229 (1967)
  15. H.P. Bradford, Anal. Biochem., 72, 248-254 (1976)
  16. H.P. Bradford, Anal. Biochem., 72, 248-254 (1976)
  17. T A. Abdurrahman, D C. Gary, Clin. Chim. Acta., 137, 151-157 (1984)
  18. H. Keysin, Besin Kimyasi, Cilt 1, Fatih Yayinevi Matbaasi, istanbul, 368-369, 1981.