Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Production, puri cation, and characterization of a thermo-alkali stable andmetal-tolerant carboxymethylcellulase from newly isolatedBacillusmethylotrophicusY37

Pages
802–815
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The biochemicalproperties of this CMCase make the enzyme a good candidate for many industrial applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-degrading bacterium was isolated from soil, identi ed asBacillus methy-lotrophicusaccording to the physiological properties and analyses of 16S rRNA and a partial sequence of the gyrase A(gyrA) gene, and named asB. methylotrophicusY37.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CMCase enzyme was puri ed to homogeneity by 20.4-fold with21.73% recovery using single-step hydrophobic interaction chromatography and biochemically characterized.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The biochemicalproperties of this CMCase make the enzyme a good candidate for many industrial applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-degrading bacterium was isolated from soil, identi ed asBacillus methy-lotrophicusaccording to the physiological properties and analyses of 16S rRNA and a partial sequence of the gyrase A(gyrA) gene, and named asB. methylotrophicusY37. The CMCase enzyme was puri ed to homogeneity by 20.4-fold with21.73% recovery using single-step hydrophobic interaction chromatography and biochemically characterized. CMCaseshowed a molecular weight of approximately 50 kDa as determined by SDS-PAGE. The activity pro le of the CMCaseenzyme exhibited optimum activity at 45◦C and pH 5.0. The activity was highly stable at alkaline pH levels. Morethan 90% of the original CMCase activity was maintained at relatively high temperatures ranging from 55 to 65◦C.The enzyme activity was induced by Ca2+, Cd2+, Co2+, K+, Mg2+, and Na1+, whereas it was strongly inhibited byphenylmethanesulfonyl uoride and iodoacetic acid. The enzyme tolerated Hg2+up to 10 mM and presented hydrolyticactivity towards glucan, lter paper, laminarin, and CMC but noto-nitrophenyl-D-galactopyranoside. Kinetic analysisof the puri ed enzyme showed Kmand Vmaxvalues of 0.19 mg mL1and 7.46 U mL1, respectively. The biochemicalproperties of this CMCase make the enzyme a good candidate for many industrial applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, Y., POLAT, F., SERTEL, A., KARAKUŞ, Y. Y. (2022). Production, puri cation, and characterization of a thermo-alkali stable andmetal-tolerant carboxymethylcellulase from newly isolatedBacillusmethylotrophicusY37. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 802–815. https://ajindex.com/articles/602027

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Maki, M.; Leung, K. T.; Qin, W.Int. J. Biol. Sci.2009,5, 500-516. 2.Quintana, E.; Valls, C.; Vidal, T.; Roncero, M. B.Cellulose2015,22, 2081-2093. 3.Bhat, M. K.Biotechnol. Adv.2000,18, 355-383. 4.Baldrian, P.; Valaskova, V.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.2008,32, 501-521. 5.Sadhu, S.; Saha, S.; Sen, S. K.; Mayilraj, S.; Maiti, T. K.Springerplus2013,2-10. 6.Acharya, S.; Chaudhary, A.Braz. J. Microbiol.2012,43, 844-856. 7.George, P. S.; Ahmad, A.; Rao, M. B.Bioresour. Technol.2001,77, 171-175. 8.Yin, L. J.; Huang, P. S.; Lin, H. H.Agric. Food Chem.2010,58, 9833-9837. 9.Kaur, J.; Chadha, B. S.; Kumar, B. A.; Kaur, G. S.; Saini, H. S.Electron. J. Biotechnol.2007,10, 260-270. 10.Hazlewood, G. P., Laurie, J. I., Ferreira, L. M.; Gilbert, H. J.J. Appl. Bacteriol.1992,72, 244-251. 11.Kang, H. J.; Uegaki, K.; Fukada, H.; Ishikawa, K.Extremophiles2007,11, 251-256. 12.Fujimoto, N.; Kosaka, T.; Nakao, T.; Yamada, M.Open Biotechnol. J.2011,5, 7-13. 13.Ariffin, H.; Hassan, M. A.; Umi Kalsom, M. S.; Abdullah, N.; Ghazali, F. M.; Shirai, Y.J. Biosci. Bioeng.2008,106, 231-236. 14.Fox, G. E.; Wisotzkey, J. D.; Jurtshuk, P. J.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.1992,42, 166-170. 15.Deka, D.; Jawed, M.; Goyal, A.Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol.2013,43, 256-270. 16.Bischoff, K. M.; Rooney, A. P.; Li, X. L.; Liu, S.; Hughes, S. R.Biotechnol. Lett.2006,28, 1761-1765. 17.Lee, Y.; Kim, B.; Lee, B.; Jo, K.; Lee, N.; Chung, C.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.Bioresour. Technol.2008,99, 378-386. 18.Yan, H.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, L.; Liu, D.Afr. J. Biotechnol.2011,10, 16277-16285. 19.Endo, K.; Hakamada, Y.; Takizawa, S.; Kubota, H.; Sumitomo, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Ito, S.Appl. Microbiol.Biotechnol.2001,57, 109-116. 20.Bajaj, B. K.; Pangotra, H.; Wani, A. M.; Sharma, P.; Sharma, A.Indian J. Chem. Technol.2009,16, 382-387. 21.Lin, L.; Kan, X.; Yan, H.; Wang, D.Electron. J. Biotechnol.2012,15, 1-7. 22.Mawadza, C.; Hatti-Kaul, R.; Zvauya, R.; Mattiasson, B.J. Biotechnol.2000,83, 177-187. 23.Immanuel, G.; Dhanusha, R.; Prema, P.; Palavesam, A.Int. J. Env. Sci. Technol.2006,3, 25-34. 24.Alani, F.; Anderson, W. A.; Young, M. M.Biotechnol. Lett.2008,30, 123-126. 25.Kim, C. H.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.1995,61, 959-965. 26.Huang, X. P.; Monk, C.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.2004,20, 85-92. 27.Rawat, R.; Tewari, L.Extremophiles2012,16, 637-644. 28.Lamed, R.; Tormo, J.; Chirino, A. J.; Morag, E.; Bayer, E. A.J. Mol. Biol.1994,244, 236-237. 29.Yin, L. J.; Lin, H. H.; Xiao, Z. R.J. Mar. Sci. Technol.2010,18, 466-471. 30.Balasubramanian, N.;