Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Experimental and theoretical investigation of the reaction between CO2andcarbon dioxide binding organic liquids

Pages
706–719
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that k0increased withincreasing amine concentration and temperature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The reaction kinetics of CO2absorption into new carbon dioxide binding organic liquids (CO2BOLs) was com-prehensively studied to evaluate their potential for CO2removal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A stopped- ow apparatus with conductivity detectionwas used to determine the CO2absorption kinetics of novel CO2BOLs composed of DBN (1,5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene)/1-propanol and TBD (1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene)/1-butanol.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that k0increased withincreasing amine concentration and temperature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The reaction kinetics of CO2absorption into new carbon dioxide binding organic liquids (CO2BOLs) was com-prehensively studied to evaluate their potential for CO2removal. A stopped- ow apparatus with conductivity detectionwas used to determine the CO2absorption kinetics of novel CO2BOLs composed of DBN (1,5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene)/1-propanol and TBD (1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene)/1-butanol. A modi ed termolecular reaction mechanismfor the reaction of CO2with CO2BOLs was used to calculate the observed pseudo- rst{order rate constant k0(s1)and second-order reaction rate constant k2(m3/kmol.s). Experiments were performed by varying organic base (DBN orTBD) weight percentage in alcohol medium for a temperature range of 288{308 K. It was found that k0increased withincreasing amine concentration and temperature. By comparing using two different CO2BOL systems, it was observedthat the TBD/1-butanol system has faster reaction kinetics than the DBN/1-propanol system. Finally, experimentaland theoretical activation energies of these CO2BOL systems were obtained and compared. Quantum chemical calcula-tions using spin restricted B3LYP and MP2 methods were utilized to reveal the structural and energetic details of thesingle-step termolecular reaction mechanism.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORHAN, Ö. Y., KAYI, H., ÖZDOĞAN, T., TANKAL, H., ALPER, E. (2022). Experimental and theoretical investigation of the reaction between CO2andcarbon dioxide binding organic liquids. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 706–719. https://ajindex.com/articles/602010

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Thiruvenkatachari, R.; Su, S.; An, H.; Yu, X. X.Prog. Energ. Combust.2009,35, 438-455. 2.Liu, H.; Sema, T.; Liang, Z.; Fu, K.; Idem, R.; Na, Y.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P.Sep. Purif. Technol.2014,136,81-87. 3.Yuksel Orhan,O.;Ozturk, M. C.; Seker, A.; Alper, E.Turk. J. Chem.2015,39, 13-24. 4.Heldebrant, D. J.; Yonker, C. R.; Jessop, P. G.; Phan, L.Energy Procedia2009,1, 1187-1195. 5.Jessop, P. G.; Mercer, S. M.; Heldebrant, D. J.Energy Environ. Sci.2012,5, 7240-7253. 6.da Silva, E. F.; Svendsen, H. F.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.2004,43, 3413-3418. 7.Perez, E. R.; Santos, R. H. A.; Gambardella, M. T. P.; de Macedo, L. G. M.; Rodrigunes-Filho, U. P.; Launay, J.C.; Franco, F. D.J. Org. Chem.2004,69, 8005-8011. 8.Ochiai, B.; Yokota, K.; Fujii, A.; Nagai, D.; Endo, T.Macromolecules2008,41, 1229-1236. 9.Pereira, F. S.; de Azevedo, E. R.; da Silva, E. F.; Bonagamba, T. J.; da Silva Agostini, D. L.; Magalhanes, A.;Job, A. E.; Perez Gonzalez, E. R.Tetrahedron2008,64, 10097-10106. 10.Yamada, H.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Higashii, T.; Kazama, S.J. Phys. Chem. A2011,115, 3079-3086. 11.Wang, Y.; Han, Q.; Wen, H.Mol. Simulat.2013,10, 822-827. 12.Kayi, H.; Kaiser, R. I.; Head, J. D.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2011,13, 11083-11098. 13.Kayi, H.; Kaiser, R. I.; Head, J. D.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2011,13, 15774-15784. 14.Kayi, H.; Kaiser, R. I.; Head, J. D.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2012,14, 4942-4958. 15.Yuksel Orhan, O.; Tankal, H.; Kayi, H.; Alper, E.Int. J. Greenh. Gas Cont.2016,49, 379-386. 16.Couchaux, G.; Barth, D.; Jacquin, M.; Faraj, A.; Grandjean, J.Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP2014,69,865-884. 17.Vaidya, P. D.; Kenig, E. Y.Chem. Eng. Technol.2010,33, 1577-1581.18.Caplow, M.J. Am. Chem. Soc.1968,90, 6795-6803. 19.Danckwerts, P. V.Chem. Eng. Sci.1979,34, 443-446. 20.Cullinane, J. T.; Rochelle, G. T.Fluid Phase Equilibria2005,227, 197-213. 21.Ozturk, M. C.; Yuksel Orhan, O.; Alper, E.Int. J. Greenh. Gas Cont.2014,26, 76-82. 22.Ozturk, M. C.; Ume, C. S.; Alper, E.Chem. Eng. Technol.2012,35, 2093-2098. 23.Gordesli, F. P.; Ume, C. S.; Alper, E.Inter. J. Chem. Kinet.2013,45, 566-573. 24.Ume, C. S.; Ozturk, M. C.; Alper, E.Chem. Eng. Technol.2012,35, 464-468. 25.Orhan, O. Y.; Alper, E.Chem. Eng. Technol.2015,38, 1485-1489. 26.Siemieniec, M.; Kierzkowska-Pawlak, H.; Chacuk, A.Ecol. Chem. Eng. S2012,19, 55-66. 27.Kierzkowska-Pawlak, H.; Siemieniec, M.; Chacuk, A.Chem. Pap.2013,67, 1123-1129. 28.Rayer, A. V.; Henni, A.; Li, J. L.Can. J. Chem. Eng.2013,91, 490-498. 29.Alper, E.Chem. Eng. J. Bioch