Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Effect of polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan blend ratios on morphological, optical, and thermal properties of electrospun nanofibers

Pages
137–149
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the thermal properties of the electrospun fibers were developed by incorporation of ahigh amount of CS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the electrospinning method was used to prepare polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/chitosan (CS) blendnanofibers from their solutions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect of blend ratios (PVA/CS: 1%, 3%, 5%, and 7% (w/w)), applied voltage,and flow rate on the morphological, optical, and thermal properties of electrospun nanofibers were investigated byscanning electron microscopy (SEM), fluorescence and UV-Vis spectroscopies, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA),respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the thermal properties of the electrospun fibers were developed by incorporation of ahigh amount of CS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the electrospinning method was used to prepare polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/chitosan (CS) blendnanofibers from their solutions. The effect of blend ratios (PVA/CS: 1%, 3%, 5%, and 7% (w/w)), applied voltage,and flow rate on the morphological, optical, and thermal properties of electrospun nanofibers were investigated byscanning electron microscopy (SEM), fluorescence and UV-Vis spectroscopies, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA),respectively. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis indicated the existence of related functional groups of bothPVA and CS in the electrospun fibers. During the electrospinning process, the maximum possible ratio of CS was 7%(w/w). SEM images indicated that more flat nanofibers were synthesized at lower flow rates, but the shape of the fiberswas more circular at higher flow rates. On the other hand, an increase in CS ratio, flow rate, and applied voltage causeda decrease in the transmittance values of the fibers while samples including higher concentrations of CS showed loweremission intensities. Furthermore, the thermal properties of the electrospun fibers were developed by incorporation of ahigh amount of CS.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMACI, M., CANSOY, C. E. Ö., ÖZATA, B., AÇIK, G. (2022). Effect of polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan blend ratios on morphological, optical, and thermal properties of electrospun nanofibers. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 137–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/601901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Chronakis, S. I. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2005, 167, 283-293
  2. Mokhena, T.; Jacobs, V.; Luyt, A. Express Polym. Lett. 2015, 9, 839-880
  3. Greiner, A.; Wendorff, J. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5670-5703
  4. Cengiz, U.; Avci, Z. M.; Erbil, H. Y.; Sarac, S. A. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 5815-5821
  5. Uyar, T.; Çökeliler, D.; Doğan, M.; Koçum, I. C.; Karatay, O.; Denkbaş, E. B. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 62, 762-770
  6. Koski, A.; Yim, K.; Shivkumar, S. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 493-497
  7. Tao, J.; Shivkumar, S. Mat. Lett. 2007, 61, 2325-2328
  8. Homayoni, H.; Ravandi, S. A. H.; Valizadeh, M. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 77, 656-661
  9. Deitzel, M. J.; Kleinmeyer, J.; Harris, D.; Beck Tan, N. C. Polymer 2001, 42, 261-272
  10. Synowiecki, J.; Al Khateeb, N. A. A. Q. Food Chem. 1997, 60, 605-610
  11. Geng, X.; Kwon, O. H.; Jang, J. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 5427-5432
  12. Neamnark, A.; Rujiravanit, R.; Supaphol, P. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66, 298-305
  13. BeMiller, J. N.; Whistler, R. L. Industrial Gums: Polysaccharides and Their Derivatives; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012
  14. Ohkawa, K.; Cha, D.; Kim, H.; Nishida, A.; Yamamoto, H. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25, 1600-1605
  15. Duan, B.; Yuan, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, K. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42, 2013-2022
  16. Jia, Y. T.; Gong, J.; Gu, X. H.; Kim, H. Y.; Dong, J.; Shen, X. Y. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 67, 403-409
  17. Çay, A.; Miraftab, M.; Kumbasar, E. P. A. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 61, 253-262
  18. Guibal, E.; Vooren, M. V.; Dempsey, A. B.; Roussy, J. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41, 2487-2515
  19. Lin, T.; Fang, J.; Wang, H.; Cheng, T.; Wang, X. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 3718-3723
  20. Gholipour, A.; Bahrami, S.; Nouri, M. e-Polymers 2010, 10, 1-9
  21. Giannakas, A.; Vlacha, M.; Salmas, C.; Leontiou, A.; Katapodis, P.; Stamatis, H.; Barkoula, N. M.; Ladavos, A. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 140, 408-415
  22. Miri, N. E.; Abdelouahdi, K.; Zahouily, M.; Fihri, A.; Barakat, A.; Solhy, A.; Achaby, M. E. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 1-13
  23. Zhu, H.; Parvinian, S.; Preston, C.; Vaaland, O.; Ruan, Z.; Hu, L. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3787-3792
  24. Park, J. Y.; Lee, I. H.; Bea, G. N. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2008, 14, 707-713
  25. Li, B.; Pan, S.; Yuan, H.; Zhang, Y. Composites Part A 2016, 90, 380-389
  26. Acik, G.; Yildiran, S.; Kok, G.; Salman, Y.; Tasdelen, M. A. Express Polym. Lett. 2017, 11, 799-808
  27. Baba, E. M.; Cansoy, C. E.; Zayim, E. O. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 350, 115-120
  28. Aliabadi,