Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Effect of pH and β -cyclodextrin on the photophysical properties of lamotrigine

Pages
247–256
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Molecular mechanical calculations by MM+ force field indicated that LMT is preferentially included within the β -CD cavity through its diamino-1,2,4-triazine moiety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Photophysical properties of lamotrigine (LMT) were investigated at different pH values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lamotrigine exhibited a broad absorption band at 308 nm that was shifted to 268 nm at pH 2.0 due to protonation (HLMT+).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Molecular mechanical calculations by MM+ force field indicated that LMT is preferentially included within the β -CD cavity through its diamino-1,2,4-triazine moiety.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Photophysical properties of lamotrigine (LMT) were investigated at different pH values. Lamotrigine exhibited a broad absorption band at 308 nm that was shifted to 268 nm at pH 2.0 due to protonation (HLMT+). Emission spectra of LMT at different pH values showed a single band at 483 nm except for at pH 2.0, where a second band at 502 nm was observed due to the deprotonation from the singlet excited state. LMT pH profile was used to calculate pK a of LMT in excited and ground states (pK a* = 4.50 and pK a = 5.90). Absorption spectra of LMT at different pH values for LMT in the presence of β -CD showed an isosbestic point at 290 nm. A significant enhancement in the emission intensity of LMT upon increasing $β -CD (0–7 mmol L ^{−1} )$ was reported. Benesi–Hildebrand analysis showed that LMT/β -CD and HLMT+ /β -CD complexes have 1:1 stoichiometry, with K11 values ranging from 122 at pH 2.0 to 50 at pH 8.0. Thermodynamic parameters showed that complexation process is enthalpy driven $(∆H◦ = −23.1 kJ.mol ^{−1} at pH 2.0 and –24.1 kJ.mol ^{−1} at pH 8.0)$. Molecular mechanical calculations by MM+ force field indicated that LMT is preferentially included within the β -CD cavity through its diamino-1,2,4-triazine moiety.

🔖

Cite This Article

YOUSEF, F., GHANEM, R., AWWAD, O. A. (2022). Effect of pH and β -cyclodextrin on the photophysical properties of lamotrigine. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 247–256. https://ajindex.com/articles/601762

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Tekin, S.; Aykut Bingol, C.; Tanridag, T.; Aktan, S. J. Neural Transm. 1998, 105, 295-303
  2. Nicol Ferrier, I. British Medical Bulletin 2001, 57, 179-192
  3. Tjia-Leong, E.; Leong, K.; Marson, A. G. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, 12, CD007783
  4. Brewster, M. E.; Loftsson, T. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2007. 59, 645-666
  5. Kim, Y. H.; Cho, D. W.; Song, N. W.; Kim, D.; Yoon, M. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, Chem. 1997, 106, 161-167
  6. Muthu Vijayan Enoch, I. V.; Swaminathan, M. J. Fluoresc. 2004, 14, 751-756
  7. Stalin, T.; Rajendiran, N. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2005, 61, 3087-3096
  8. Cox, G. S.; Turro, N. J.; Yang, N. C; Chen, M.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 422-424
  9. Velasco, J.; Carmona, C.; Munoz, M. A.; Guardado, P.; Balon, M. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 1999, 35, 637-648
  10. Jahagirdar, K. H.; Bhise, K. S. Int. J. Pharm. Chem. Sci. 2014, 3, 757-765
  11. Parmar, K. R.; Patel, K. A.; Shah, S. R.; Sheth, N. R. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2009, 65, 263-268
  12. Young, R. B.; Chefetz, B.; Liu, A.; Desyaterikd, Y.; Borch, T. Environ. Sci. Processes Impacts 2014, 16, 848-857
  13. El-Enany, N. M.; El-Sherbiny, D. T.; Abdelal, A. A.; Belal, F. F. J. Fluoresc. 2010, 20, 463-472
  14. Bilski, P. J.; Wolak, M. A.; Zhang, V.; Moore, D. E.; Chignell, C. F. Photochem. Photobiol. 2009, 85: 1327-1335
  15. Tajima, S.; Shiobara, S.; Shizuka, H.; Tobita, S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 3376-3382
  16. Takahashi, K. J. Chem. Soc.; Chem. Commun. 1991, 929-930
  17. Gutman, M.; Nachliel, E. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1231, 123-138
  18. Pappayee, N.; Mishra, A. K. Indian J. Chem. 2000, 39A, 964-973
  19. Wang, Y. H.; Wan, P. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2011, 10, 1934-1944
  20. Garc´ıa-Padial, M.; Mart´ınez-Oh´arriz, M. C.; Isasi, J. R.; V´elaz, I.; Zornoza, A. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2013, 75, 241-246
  21. Rajamohan, R.; Nayaki, S. K.; Swaminathan, M. J. Solution Chem. 2011, 40, 803-817
  22. Vasquez, J. M.; Vu, A.; Schultz, J. S.; Vullev, V. I. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25, 906-914
  23. Zhang, Q. F.; Jiang, Z. T.; Guo, Y. X.; Li, R. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2008, 69, 65-70
  24. Liu, L.; Guo, Q. X. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl Chem. 2002, 42, 1-14
  25. Velasco, J.; Guardado, P.; Carmona, C.; Munoz, M. A.; Balon, M. J. Chem. Soc.; Faraday Trans. 1998, 94, 1469-1476
  26. Benesi, H. A.; Hildebrand, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2703-2707
  27. Al Omari, M. M.; Daraghmeh, D. H.; El-Barghouthi, M. I.; Zughul, M. B.; Chowdhry, B. Z.; Leharne, S. A