Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

Qualitative and quantitative determination of the effective components of the plants in different herbal slimming products in Turkey by HPLC

Pages
825–833
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The methods developed can be used for routine quality control analysis of these effectivecompounds in different herbal slimming products.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Obesity is a serious disease that can be due to genetic and environmental reasons and is defined by the WorldHealth Organization as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, new, simple, and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography methods were developedfor qualitative and quantitative determination of arbutin, hydroquinone, ursolic acid, chlorogenic acid, epigallocatechingallate, epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate, and catechin in eleven herbal slimming products in Turkey containingCamellia sinensis, Ilex paraguariensis, and Calluna vulgaris.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The methods developed can be used for routine quality control analysis of these effectivecompounds in different herbal slimming products.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Obesity is a serious disease that can be due to genetic and environmental reasons and is defined by the WorldHealth Organization as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health. There is an increasing trendtowards herbal slimming products in obesity treatment. The quality control analysis of these products is important forpublic health. In this study, new, simple, and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography methods were developedfor qualitative and quantitative determination of arbutin, hydroquinone, ursolic acid, chlorogenic acid, epigallocatechingallate, epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate, and catechin in eleven herbal slimming products in Turkey containingCamellia sinensis, Ilex paraguariensis, and Calluna vulgaris. The intra- and interday precisions, stated as the relativestandard deviation, were less than 2% and accuracy, based on relative error, was less than 10%. The limits of detectionand quantification for arbutin and hydroquinone were 0.80 and 2.40 µg/mL and for the other compounds were 0.30and 0.90 µg/mL, respectively. The methods developed can be used for routine quality control analysis of these effectivecompounds in different herbal slimming products.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, B., GÜVENALP, Z., GÖZCÜ, S., DURSUNOĞLU, B., YUCA, H. (2022). Qualitative and quantitative determination of the effective components of the plants in different herbal slimming products in Turkey by HPLC. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 825–833. https://ajindex.com/articles/601670

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Çayır, A.; Atak, N.; Köse, S. K. Ank. Üni. Tıp Fak. Mecm. 2011, 64, 13-19
  2. Kalan, I.; Yeşil, Y. Meslek İçi Sürekli Eğitim Dergisi 2010, 23-24, 78-81
  3. Barja-Fernandez, S.; Leis, R.; Casanueva, F. F.; Seoane, L. M. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2014, 8, 2391-2400
  4. Manning, S.; Pucci, A.; Finer, N. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2014, 5, 135-148
  5. Dabhade, S.; Dabhade, S. S.; Tiwari, S. A.; Rane, B. T.; Meenakshi, S. Int. J. Cur. Res. Rev. 2013, 5, 71-82
  6. Altunkaynak, B. Z.; Özbek, E. Van Tıp Dergisi 2006, 13, 138-142
  7. Mohamed, G. A.; Ibrahim, S. R. M.; Elkhayat, E. S.; Dine, R. S. E. Bull. Fac. Pharm. Cairo Univ. 2014, 52, 269-284
  8. Gruenwald, J.; Brendler, T.; Jaenicke, C. PDR for Herbal Medicines; Medical Economics Company, Inc.: Montvale, NJ, USA, 2000
  9. Aslan, M.; Orhan, N. Meslek İçi Sürekli Eğitim Dergisi 2010, 23-24, 96-97
  10. Basu, A.; Sanchez, K.; Leyva, M. J.; Wu, M.; Betts, N. M.; Aston, C. E.; Lyons, T. J. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2010, 29, 31-40
  11. Taheri, M.; Sariri, R. Pharmacologyonline 2011, 1, 487-505
  12. Gambero, A.; Ribeiro, M. L. Nutrients 2015, 7, 730-750
  13. Jayaprakasam, B.; Olson, L. K.; Schutzki, R. E.; Tai, M. H.; Nair, M. G. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 243-248
  14. Kim, J.; Jang, D. S.; Kim, H.; Kim, J. S. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2009, 32, 983-987
  15. Hsu, C. L.; Huang, S. L.; Yen, G. C. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4191-4197
  16. Baytop, T. Türkiye’de Bitkilerle Tedavi (Geçmişte ve Bugün); Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri: İstanbul, Turkey, 1999
  17. Lukas, B.; Schmiderer, C.; Mitteregger, U.; Novak, J. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 185-190
  18. Jurica, K.; Karaconji, I. B.; Segan, S.; Opsenica, D. M.; Kremer, D. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol. 2015, 66, 197-202
  19. Xu, X. H.; Su, Q.; Zang, Z. H. J. Pharm. Anal. 2012, 2, 238-240
  20. Grujic, N.; Lepojevic, Z,; Srdjenovic, B.; Vladic, J.; Sudji, J. Molecules 2012, 17, 2518-2528
  21. Wang, H.; Helliwell, K.; You, X. Food Chem. 2000, 68, 115-121
  22. Rychlinska, I.; Nowak, S. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 2012, 40, 109-113
  23. Zhang, X.; Wu, Z.; Weng, P.; Yang, Y. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2015, 50, 885-891
  24. Fernandez, P. L.; Martín, M. J.; Gonzalez, A. G.; Pablos, F. Analyst 2000, 125, 421-425
  25. Roman, M. C.; Hildreth, J.; Bannister, S. J. AOAC Int. 2013, 96, 933-941
  26. Hongbing, G.; Huan, W.; Fengguo, D. Funct. Mater. 2016, 23, 437-442
  27. Li, D.; Martini, N.; Wu, Z.; Wen, J. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 1267-1274
  28. Zou, S.; Chen, W. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2008, 19, 1429-1432
  29. Tang, H. B.; Cai,