Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Phenolic compounds, essential oil composition, and antioxidant activity of Angelica purpurascens (Avé-Lall.) Gill

Pages
956–966
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, the MEs and EO of A. purpurascens can be used as a natural antioxidant source.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, methanol extracts (MEs) and essential oil (EO) of Angelica purpurascens (Avé-Lall.) Gill obtained from different parts (root, stem, leaf, and seed) were evaluated in terms of antioxidant activity, total phenolics, compositions of phenolic compound, and essential oil with the methods of 2,2-azino-bis(3ethylbenzo-thiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS•+), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazil (DPPH•) radical scavenging activities, and ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP), the Folin–Ciocalteu, liquid chromatography− tandem mass spectrometry (LC−MS/MS), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC−MS), respectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The root extract of A. purpurascens exhibited the highest ABTS•+, DPPH•, and FRAP activities $(IC_{50}$: 0.05 ± 0.0001 mg/mL, $IC_{50}$: 0.06 ± 0.002 mg/mL, 821.04 ± 15.96 µM TEAC (Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity), respectively).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, the MEs and EO of A. purpurascens can be used as a natural antioxidant source.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, methanol extracts (MEs) and essential oil (EO) of Angelica purpurascens (Avé-Lall.) Gill obtained from different parts (root, stem, leaf, and seed) were evaluated in terms of antioxidant activity, total phenolics, compositions of phenolic compound, and essential oil with the methods of 2,2-azino-bis(3ethylbenzo-thiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS•+), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazil (DPPH•) radical scavenging activities, and ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP), the Folin–Ciocalteu, liquid chromatography− tandem mass spectrometry (LC−MS/MS), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC−MS), respectively. The root extract of A. purpurascens exhibited the highest ABTS•+, DPPH•, and FRAP activities $(IC_{50}$: 0.05 ± 0.0001 mg/mL, $IC_{50}$: 0.06 ± 0.002 mg/mL, 821.04 ± 15.96 µM TEAC (Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity), respectively). Moreover, EO of A. purpurascens root displayed DPPH• scavenging activity $(IC_{50}$: 2.95 ± 0.084 mg/mL). The root extract had the highest total phenolic content (438.75 ± 16.39 GAE (gallic acid equivalent), µg/mL)). Twenty compounds were identified by LC−MS/MS. The most abundant phenolics were ferulic acid (244.39 ± 15.64 μg/g extract), benzoic acid (138.18 ± 8.84 μg/g extract), oleuropein (78.04 ± 4.99 μg/g extract), and rutin (31.21 ± 2.00 μg/g extract) in seed, stem, root, and leaf extracts, respectively. According to the GC−MS analysis, the major components were determined as α-bisabolol (22.93%), cubebol (14.39%), α-pinene (11.63%), and α-limonene (9.41%) among 29 compounds. Consequently, the MEs and EO of A. purpurascens can be used as a natural antioxidant source.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKÖSE, M., TÜRKUÇAR, S. A., KARAÇELİK, A. A. (2022). Phenolic compounds, essential oil composition, and antioxidant activity of Angelica purpurascens (Avé-Lall.) Gill. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 956–966. https://ajindex.com/articles/601438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Yang CS, Ho CT, Zhang J, Wan X, Zhang K et al. Antioxidants: differing meanings in food science and health science. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2018; 66 (12): 3063-3068. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05830 2. Wu D, Cederbaum AI. Alcohol, oxidative stress, and free radical damage. Alcohol Research and Health 2003; 27 (4): 277-284. doi: 10.1079/ pns2006496 3. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MTD, Mazur M et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 2007; 39 (1): 44-84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001 4. Pham-Huy LA, He H, Pham-Huy C. Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. International Journal of Biomedical Science 2008; 4 (2): 89-96. 5. Badarinath AV, Mallikarjuna Rao K, Madhu Sudhana Chetty C, Ramkanth S, Rajan TVS et al. A review on in-vitro antioxidant methods: comparisons, correlations and considerations. International Journal of PharmTech Research 2010; 2 (2): 1276-1285. 6. Rahman T, Hosen I, Islam MMT, Shekhar HU. Oxidative stress and human health. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology 2012; 3 (7): 997-1019. doi: 10.4236/abb.2012.327123 7. Oliveira BF, Nogueira-Machado JA, Chaves MM. The role of oxidative stress in the aging process. The Scientific World Journal 2010; 10: 1121-1128. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.94 8. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacognosy Reviews 2010; 4 (8): 118-126. doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.70902 9. Shahidi F, Ho CT. Antioxidant measurement and applications: an overview. In: Shahidi F, Ho CT (editors). Antioxidant Measurement and Applications. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2007, pp. 2-7. 10. Lourenço SC, Moldão-Martins M, Alves VD. Antioxidants of natural plant origins: From sources to food industry applications. Molecules 2019; 24 (22): 4132. doi: 10.3390/molecules24224132 11. Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). İstanbul, Türkiye: Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi, 2012 (in Turkish). 12. Hamzaoğlu E, Koç M. A new gigantic species from Turkey, Angelica turcica (Umbelliferae). Phytotaxa 2016; 245 (1): 66-70. doi: 10.11646/ phytotaxa.245.1.7 13. Shawky E, Abou El Kheir RM. Rapid discrimination of different Apiaceae species based on HPTLC fingerprints and targeted flavonoids determination using multivariate image analysis. Phytochemical Analysis 2018; 29 (5):