Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Determination of formaldehyde in textile dye and auxiliary chemicals with headspace gas chromatography-flame ionization detector

Pages
575–581
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This allows all quality control processes to be handled using only one method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Formaldehyde is a chemical used in many different industrial sectors and is classified as a carcinogen as well as causing allergic reactions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, in order to meet these requirements, formaldehyde was converted to oxime derivative by derivatization with o-(2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine hydrochloride.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This allows all quality control processes to be handled using only one method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Formaldehyde is a chemical used in many different industrial sectors and is classified as a carcinogen as well as causing allergic reactions. Due to the health effects of formaldehyde, which is widely used in textile dyes and auxiliary chemicals, its analysis in this type of matrices becomes important. In this study, in order to meet these requirements, formaldehyde was converted to oxime derivative by derivatization with o-(2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine hydrochloride. This derivative was successfully sampled with the headspace technique and analyzed with a gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). For the developed method, derivatization and salt effect parameters were investigated. For the method, the limit of detection (LOD) was found as 0.05 $mg L^{-1}$ and real sample analyzes were made for different types of dyes used in the textile industry, and sodium naphthalene sulfoxylate formaldehyde. In addition, the developed method was validated with sodium naphthalene sulfoxylate formaldehyde against ISO 14184-1 method by applying student t-, F- tests and no difference was found in terms of accuracy and precision. Thus, the applicability of the developed method to dyes and auxiliary chemicals used in the textile industry was successfully demonstrated. This allows all quality control processes to be handled using only one method.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, Z., ARDA, A., GÜNEŞ, K. (2022). Determination of formaldehyde in textile dye and auxiliary chemicals with headspace gas chromatography-flame ionization detector. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 575–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/601364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Tang X, Bai Y, Duong A, Smith MT, Li L et al. Formaldehyde in China: Production, consumption, exposure levels, and health effects. Environment International 2009
  2. 35 (8): 1210 1224. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.06.002 2. Rivero RT, Topiwala V. Quantitative determination of formaldehyde in cosmetics using a combined solid-phase microextraction-isotope dilution mass spectrometry method. Journal of Chromatography A 2004
  3. 1029 (1 2): 217 222. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.12.054 3. Kanwal S, Ma Q, Fu X, Yuan P, Su X. A flow-injection chemiluminescence determination of formaldehyde in textiles. Spectroscopy Letters 2010
  4. 43 (2): 84 90. doi: 10.1080/00387010903278275 4. Dehabadi VA, Rgen Buschmann HJ, Gutmann JS. Durable press finishing of cotton fabrics: An overview. Textile Research Journal 2013
  5. 83 (18): 1974 1995. doi: 10.1177/0040517513483857 5. Iqbal M, Mughal J, Sohail M, Moiz A, Ahmed K et al. Comparison between pigment printing systems with acrylate and butadiene based binders. Journal of Analytical Sciences 2012
  6. 87 91. doi: 10.4236/jasmi.2012.22016 6. Sáenz M, Alvarado J, Pena-Pereira F, Senra-Ferreiro S, Lavilla I et al. Liquid-phase microextraction with in-drop derivatization combined with microvolume fluorospectrometry for free and hydrolyzed formaldehyde determination in textile samples. Analytica Chimica Acta 2011
  7. 687 (1): 50 55. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.12.006 7. De Groot AC, Flyvholm MA, Lensen G, Menné T, Coenraads PJ. Formaldehyde-releasers: Relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Contact allergy to formaldehyde and inventory of formaldehyde-releasers. Contact Dermatitis 2009
  8. 61 (2): 63 85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0536.2009.01582.x 8. Birkeland MJ, Lorenz L, Wescott JM, Frihart CR. Determination of native (wood derived) formaldehyde by the desiccator method in particleboards generated during panel production. Holzforschung 2010
  9. 64 (4): 429 433. doi: 10.1515/hf.2010.070 9. Chrastil J, Reinhardt M. Direct colorimetric determination of formaldehyde in textile fabrics and other materials. Analytical Chemistry 1986
  10. 58 (13): 2848 2850. doi: 10.1021/ac00126a057 10. Gani AA, Yuwono M, Kuswandi B. Development of optical chemical sensor based on pararosaniline in sol-gel Matrix for detection of formaldehyde in food samples. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2013
  11. 4 (11): 661 667. doi: 10.4236/ajac.2013.411079 11. Lavilla I, Cabaleiro N, Pena F, de la Calle I, Bendicho C. Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction with simultaneous