Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Myelin disorders and stem cells: as therapies and models

Pages
1068–1080
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further basic science studies along with clinical interventions should close the knowledge gap and should help spread the positive results to a larger population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Myelin disorders burden millions of people around the world, yet existing therapies are inadequate to cure them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The combined outcome of the discussed studies offers a promising future as stem cell transplantation generally results in decreased symptoms and improved quality of life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further basic science studies along with clinical interventions should close the knowledge gap and should help spread the positive results to a larger population.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Myelin disorders burden millions of people around the world, yet existing therapies are inadequate to cure them. Current remedies commonly treat the symptoms with minimal to no effect on the actual cause of the disorder. The basis and/or the mechanism of demyelination is not known for many of the disorders either. In recent years, stem cells of variable origin have been used in clinical trials as transplant agents to restore the defective biochemical process or the damaged tissue. We summarize the outcomes of these trials for demyelination disorders. The capability of reprograming mature cells into stem cells equips researchers with a new tool to replicate disease phenotypes in cell culture dishes for basic research and therapeutic screens. The applications of in vitro myelination disorder models are also discussed. The combined outcome of the discussed studies offers a promising future as stem cell transplantation generally results in decreased symptoms and improved quality of life. However, the mechanism of action of the interventions is not known and in cases of negative outcomes the reasons are usually obscure. Further basic science studies along with clinical interventions should close the knowledge gap and should help spread the positive results to a larger population.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDINLI, F. İ., ÇELİK, E., VATANDAŞLAR, B. K., KERMAN, B. E. (2022). Myelin disorders and stem cells: as therapies and models. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 1068–1080. https://ajindex.com/articles/600437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Allison DJ, Ditor DS (2015). Immune dysfunction and chronic inflammation following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 53: 14- 18. Almad A, Sahinkaya FR, McTigue DM (2011). Oligodendrocyte fate after spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics 8: 262-273.
  2. Anlar B, Yalaz K (2011). Prognosis in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Dev Med Child Neurol 53: 965. Baarine M, Khan M, Singh A, Singh I (2015). Functional characterization of IPSC-derived brain cells as a model for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. PLoS One 10: e0143238. Bai L, Hecker J, Kerstetter A, Miller RH (2013). Myelin repair and functional recovery mediated by neural cell transplantation in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Bull 29: 239-250.
  3. Bai L, Lennon DP, Eaton V, Maier K, Caplan AI, Miller SD, Miller RH (2009). Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells induce Th2-polarized immune response and promote endogenous repair in animal models of multiple sclerosis. Glia 57: 1192-1203.
  4. Barnabe-Heider F, Frisen J (2008). Stem cells for spinal cord repair. Cell Stem Cell 3: 16-24.
  5. Bellini WJ, Rota JS, Lowe LE, Katz RS, Dyken PR, Zaki SR, Shieh WJ, Rota PA (2005). Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis: more cases of this fatal disease are prevented by measles immunization than was previously recognized. J Infect Dis 192: 1686-1693.
  6. Ben-Hur T (2008). Immunomodulation by neural stem cells. J Neurol Sci 265: 102-104.
  7. Bowen JD, Kraft GH, Wundes A, Guan Q, Maravilla KR, Gooley TA, McSweeney PA, Pavletic SZ, Openshaw H, Storb R et al. (2012). Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation following high-dose immunosuppressive therapy for advanced multiple sclerosis: long-term results. Bone Marrow Transplant 47: 946- 951. Campbell H, Andrews N, Brown KE, Miller E (2007). Review of the effect of measles vaccination on the epidemiology of SSPE. Int J Epidemiol 36: 1334-1348.
  8. Cao W, Yang Y, Wang Z, Liu A, Fang L, Wu F, Hong J, Shi Y, Leung S, Dong C et al. (2011). Leukemia inhibitory factor inhibits T helper 17 cell differentiation and confers treatment effects of neural progenitor cell therapy in autoimmune disease. Immunity 35: 273-284.
  9. Carbajal KS, Mironova Y, Ulrich-Lewis JT, Kulkarni D, Grifka-Walk HM, Huber AK, Shrager P, Giger RJ, Segal BM (2015). Th cell diversity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J Immunol 195: 2552-2559.
  10. Cartier N, Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Bartholomae CC, Veres G, Schmidt M, Kutschera I, Vidaud M, Abel U, Dal-Cortivo L, Caccavelli L et al. (2009). He