Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4

Rejuvenation of mature lentisk by micrografting and evaluation of genetic stability

Pages
781–796
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of successfully inducing plantlets from mature lentisk genotypes and the first analysis of clonal fidelity of regenerated mature female and male P.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An in vitro propagation method was established for both male and female genotypes of lentisk using actively growing shoot tips derived from forcefully lignified shoots.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since rooting of the regenerated shoots for both genotypes was not achieved, an in vitro micrografting method was developed for the production of plantlets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of successfully inducing plantlets from mature lentisk genotypes and the first analysis of clonal fidelity of regenerated mature female and male P.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An in vitro propagation method was established for both male and female genotypes of lentisk using actively growing shoot tips derived from forcefully lignified shoots. The effects of growth regulators on in vitro morphogenesis were investigated. Since rooting of the regenerated shoots for both genotypes was not achieved, an in vitro micrografting method was developed for the production of plantlets. Moreover, genetic stability of 3-, 6-, and 24-times subcultured clones of both genotypes was assessed and compared with the mother plants using fluorescent-based amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis. The set of main plants and the different subcultured clones were divided into two clusters. In the first cluster, the original male and female plants were grouped together with the 3-times subcultured female and the 6-times subcultured male and female groups, whereas the second cluster contained the 24-times subcultured clones and the 3-times subcultured male group. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of successfully inducing plantlets from mature lentisk genotypes and the first analysis of clonal fidelity of regenerated mature female and male P. Lentiscus L. Plants by AFLP.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINKUT, A. U., ŞAKİROĞLU, M., TİLKAT, E., YILDIRIM, H., ÖZDEN, Y. Ç., KOÇ, İ., KILINÇ, F. M., KAAKAŞ, Ö. M., ÇALAR, N., AKDEMİR, Ö. F., ONAY, A. (2022). Rejuvenation of mature lentisk by micrografting and evaluation of genetic stability. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4, 781–796. https://ajindex.com/articles/600365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ai PF, Lu LP, Song JJ (2011). Cryopreservation of in vitro-grown shoot-tips of Rabdosia rubescens by encapsulation-dehydration and evaluation of their genetic stability. Plant Cell Tiss Org 108: 381-387.
  2. Ak BE, Parlakcı H (2009). Pistacia lentiscus in the Mediterranean region in Turkey. Acta Hortic 818: 77-82.
  3. Arencibia A, Carmona ER, Cornide MT, Castiglione S, Orelly J, Chinea A, Oramai P, Sala F (1999). Somaclonal variation in insect resistance transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid) plants produced by cell electroporation. Transgenic Res 8: 349-360.
  4. Bairu MW, Aremu AO, Van Staden J (2011). Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul 63: 147-173.
  5. Barghchi M (1986). In vitro culture of mature commercial varieties of Pistacia vera L. In: Proceedings of the International Plant Propagation Society, Vol. 35, pp. 331-333.
  6. Barghchi M, Martinelli A (1984). In vitro propagation of mature Pistacia vera varieties of Kerman (female) and Peter's (male) Pistachio. In: Proceedings of the 41st Easter School Symposium on Plant Tissue Culture and its Agricultural Applications, University of Nottingham, Abstract 75. Çalar N (2013). Sakız ağacı (Pistacia lentiscus L.)'nın Pistacia anaçları (Pistacia vera L., Pistaciakhinjuk Stocks, Pistacia atlantica Desf., Pistacia terebinthus L.) üzerine in vitro mikroaşılanması. MSc, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey (in Turkish). Çalar N, Yıldırım H, Binici M, Kılınç FM, Akdemir ÖF, Onay A (2012). Erkek ve dişi sakız ağaçlarının (Pistacia lentiscus) çeliklerinden zorlama teknikleri yoluyla in vitro kültürlerin başlatılması. In: 21. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, 3-7 September 2012,
  7. Ege University, İzmir, Turkey (in Turkish). Correia OA, Catarino FM (1994). Seasonal changes in soil-to-leaf resistance in Cistus sp. and Pistacia lentiscus. Acta Oecol 15: 289-300.
  8. Cote F, Teisson CP (2001). Somaclonal variation rate evolution in plant tissue culture: contribution to understanding through a statistical approach. In Vitro Cell Dev-Pl 37: 539-542.
  9. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620.
  10. Fascella G, Airo M, Zizzo GV, Ruffoni B (2004). Prime osservazioni sulla coltivazione in vitro di Lentisco (Pistacia lentiscus L.). Italus Hortus 11: 141-143 (in Italian). Fisichella M, Silvi E, Morini S (2000). Regeneration of somatic embryos and roots from quince leaves cultured on media with different micr