Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

An updated analysis of variations in SARS-CoV-2 genome

Pages
157–167
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that, frequency rates of these 11 variations change between 3.56%–88.44 % and these rates differ greatly depending on the continents they have been reported.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A novel pathogen, named SARS-CoV-2, has caused an unprecedented worldwide pandemic in the first half of 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences have become available, one of the important focus of scientists has become tracking variations in the viral genome.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that, frequency rates of these 11 variations change between 3.56%–88.44 % and these rates differ greatly depending on the continents they have been reported.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A novel pathogen, named SARS-CoV-2, has caused an unprecedented worldwide pandemic in the first half of 2020. As the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences have become available, one of the important focus of scientists has become tracking variations in the viral genome. In this study, 30366 SARS-CoV-2 isolate genomes were aligned using the software developed by our group (ODOTool) and 11 variations in SARS-CoV-2 genome over 10% of whole isolates were discussed. Results indicated that, frequency rates of these 11 variations change between 3.56%–88.44 % and these rates differ greatly depending on the continents they have been reported. Despite some variations being in low frequency rate in some continents, C14408T and A23403G variations on Nsp12 and S protein, respectively, observed to be the most prominent variations all over the world, in general, and both cause missense mutations. It is also notable that most of isolates carry C14408T and A23403 variations simultaneously and also nearly all isolates carrying the G25563T variation on ORF3a, also carry C14408T and A23403 variations, although their location distributions are not similar. All these data should be considered towards development of vaccine and antiviral treatment strategies as well as tracing diversity of virus in all over the world.

🔖

Cite This Article

UĞUREL, O. M., BALIK, D. T., ATA, O. (2022). An updated analysis of variations in SARS-CoV-2 genome. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 157–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/600175

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Angelini MM, Akhlaghpour M, Neuman BW, Buchmeier MJ (2013). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural proteins 3, 4, and 6 induce double-membrane vesicles. mBio 4 (4): e00524-13. doi:10.1128/mBio.00524-13
  2. Azhar EI, El-Kafrawy SA, Farraj SA, Hassan AM, Al-Saeed MS et al. (2014). Evidence for camel-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. New England Journal of Medicine 370 (26): 2499- 2505. Bardou P, Mariette J, Escudié F, Djemiel C, Klopp C (2014). jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics 15 (1): 293. Belalov IS, Lukashev AN (2013). Causes and implications of codon usage bias in RNA viruses. PLoS One 8 (2): e56642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056642 Brian DA, Baric RS (2005). Coronavirus Genome Structure and Replication. In: Enjuanes L. (editor) Coronavirus Replication and Reverse Genetics. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol 287. Berlin, Heidelberg; Springer. Briguglio I, Piras S, Corona P, Carta A (2011). Inhibition of RNA Helicases of SsRNA + Virus Belonging to Flaviviridae, Coronaviridae and Picornaviridae Families. International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2011: 1–22. doi: 10.1155/2011/213135 Bulmer M (1987). Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance. Nature 325 (6106): 728-730.
  3. Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D (2020). Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. Journal of Medical Virology 92 (4): 418-423. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25681 Cheng VC, Lau SK, Woo PC, Yuen KY (2007). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 20 (4): 660-694.
  4. Chew SK (2007). SARS: how a global epidemic was stopped. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85 (4): 324. doi: 10.2471/ BLT.07.032763 Cock PJ, Antao T, Chang JT, Chapman BA, Cox CJ et al. (2009). Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25 (11): 1422-1423.
  5. Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL (2019). Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nature reviews Microbiology 17 (3): 181-192. de Groot RJ, Baker SC, Baric RS, Brown CS, Drosten C et al. (2013). Commentary: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the Coronavirus Study Group. Journal of Virology 87 (14): 7790-7792.
  6. De Lorenzo G, Drikic M, Papa G, Eichwald C, Burrone OR et al. (2016). An inhibitory motif on the 5’UTR of several rotavirus genome segments affects protein expression and reverse genetics strat