Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

Determination of the interaction between the receptor binding domain of 2019-nCoV spike protein, TMPRSS2, cathepsin B and cathepsin L, and glycosidic and aglycon forms of some flavonols

Pages
484–502
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the possible inhibitory effects of these compounds on cytochromes (CYPs) should be verified by in vitro or in vivo tests and their adverse effects on cellular energy metabolism should be minimized by performing molecular modifications if necessary.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The novel coronavirus (COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2) is a rapidly spreading disease with a high mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, the interactions between specific flavonols and the 2019-nCoV receptor binding domain (RBD), transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2), and cathepsins (CatB and CatL) were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the possible inhibitory effects of these compounds on cytochromes (CYPs) should be verified by in vitro or in vivo tests and their adverse effects on cellular energy metabolism should be minimized by performing molecular modifications if necessary.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2) is a rapidly spreading disease with a high mortality. In this research, the interactions between specific flavonols and the 2019-nCoV receptor binding domain (RBD), transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2), and cathepsins (CatB and CatL) were analyzed. According to the relative binding capacity index (RBCI) calculated based on the free energy of binding and calculated inhibition constants, it was determined that robinin (ROB) and gossypetin (GOS) were the most effective flavonols on all targets. While the binding free energy of ROB with the spike glycoprotein RBD, TMPRSS2, CatB, and CatL were –5.02, –7.57, –10.10, and –6.11 kcal/mol, the values for GOS were –4.67, –5.24, –8.31, and –6.76, respectively. Furthermore, both compounds maintained their stability for at least 170 ns on respective targets in molecular dynamics simulations. The molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) calculations also corroborated these data. Considering Lipinski’s rule of five, ROB and GOS exhibited 3 (MW>500, N or O>10, NH or OH>5), and 1 (NH or OH>5) violations, respectively. Neither ROB nor GOS showed AMES toxicity or hepatotoxicity. The LD50 of these compounds in rats were 2.482 and 2.527 mol/kg, respectively. Therefore, we conclude that these compounds could be considered as alternative therapeutic agents in the treatment of COVID-19. However, the possible inhibitory effects of these compounds on cytochromes (CYPs) should be verified by in vitro or in vivo tests and their adverse effects on cellular energy metabolism should be minimized by performing molecular modifications if necessary.

🔖

Cite This Article

İSTİFLİ, E. S., TEPE, B., SARIKÜRKCÜ, C., TEPE, A. Ş., NETZ, P. A., KILIÇ, İ. H. (2022). Determination of the interaction between the receptor binding domain of 2019-nCoV spike protein, TMPRSS2, cathepsin B and cathepsin L, and glycosidic and aglycon forms of some flavonols. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 484–502. https://ajindex.com/articles/600119

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Abd El-Mordy FM, El-Hamouly MM, Ibrahim MT, Abd El-Rheem G, Aly OM et al. (2020). Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 main protease by phenolic compounds from Manilkara hexandra (Roxb.) Dubard assisted by metabolite profiling and in silico virtual screening. RSC Advances 10: 32148-32155.
  2. Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC et al. (2015). GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1-2: 19-25.
  3. Adejoro IA, Babatunde DD, Tolufashe GF (2020). Molecular docking and dynamic simulations of some medicinal plants compounds against SARS-CoV-2: an in silico study. Journal of Taibah University for Science 14: 1563-1570.
  4. Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF (2020). The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine 26: 450- 452. Arokiyaraj S, Stalin A, Kannan BS, Shin H (2020). Geranii Herba as a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main 3CLpro, spike RBD, and regulation of unfolded protein response: an in silico approach. Antibiotics 9: 863. Arora S, Lohiya G, Moharir K, Shah S, Yende S (2020). Identification of potential flavonoid inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease 6YNQ: a molecular docking study. Digital Chinese Medicine 3: 239-248.
  5. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA (2001). Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 10037-10041.
  6. Batool F, Mughal EU, Zia K, Sadiq A, Naeem N et al. (2020). Synthetic flavonoids as potential antiviral agents against SARSCoV-2 main protease. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics (In press). doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1850359 Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J et al. (2009). BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421. Cannalire R, Stefanelli I, Cerchia C, Beccari AR, Pelliccia S et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 entry inhibitors: small molecules and peptides targeting virus or host cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21: 5707. Cataneo AHD, Kuczera D, Koishi AC, Zanluca C, Silveira GF et al. (2019). The citrus flavonoid naringenin impairs the in vitro infection of human cells by Zika virus. Scientific Reports 9: 16348. Chan-Yeung M, Xu RH (2003). SARS: epidemiology. Respirology 8: S9-S14. Chan JF-W, Kok K-H, Zhu Z, Chu H, To KK-Wet al. (2020). Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wu