Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5

8x8 diallel ekmeklik buğday (T. aestivum L.) melez populasyonlarında bitki başına dane verimi, bayrak yaprak uzunluğu ve genişliğinin kalıtımı

Inheritance of grain yield per plant, flag leaf width, and legth in an 8x8 diallel cross population of bread wheat (T. aestivum L.)

Pages
339–345
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Yüreğir x Malabadi crosses should be considered for maximizing photosynthetic area of the leaf.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The inheritance of grain yield per plant, flag leaf width, and flag leaf length was studied applying Jinks-Hayman diallel analysis in an 8 x 8 wheat cross population involving the bread wheat (T. aestivum L.) genotypes Cumhuriyet, Kaşifbey, Ziyabey, Marmara, Basribey, Malabadi, Yüreğir, and Seri-82.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The crosses were made by hand, without reciprocals, in field conditions from March to May 2001, and the field experiment was conducted during the October 2002 to June 2003 growing season.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Yüreğir x Malabadi crosses should be considered for maximizing photosynthetic area of the leaf.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The inheritance of grain yield per plant, flag leaf width, and flag leaf length was studied applying Jinks-Hayman diallel analysis in an 8 x 8 wheat cross population involving the bread wheat (T. aestivum L.) genotypes Cumhuriyet, Kaşifbey, Ziyabey, Marmara, Basribey, Malabadi, Yüreğir, and Seri-82. The crosses were made by hand, without reciprocals, in field conditions from March to May 2001, and the field experiment was conducted during the October 2002 to June 2003 growing season. The analysis of data showed that the additive variance component (D) was significant for flag leaf width (P < 0.01). The dominance variance component (H,) was significant for flag leaf width and grain yield per plant. The dominance level variance component (hz) and corrected dominance variance component (H2) were significant for all 3 traits studied (P < 0.01). The Wr/Vr graphs indicated overdominance for grain yield per plant and flag leaf width, while partial dominance was inferred for flag leaf length. Flag leaf length was significantly and positively correlated with flag leaf width (r = 0.803). Yüreğir x Malabadi crosses should be considered for maximizing photosynthetic area of the leaf.

Özet

Jinks-Hayman tipi analiz metodu uygulanmasıyla 8x8 diallel ekmeklik buğday melez populasyonunda bitki başına dane verimi, bayrak yaprak uzunluğu ve genişliğinin kalıtımı araştırılmıştır. Araştırmada Ege Bölgesinde yaygın olarak yetiştirilen sekiz ekmeklik buğday çeşidi olarak Cumhuriyet, Kaşifbey, Ziyabey, Marmara, Basribey, Malabadi, Yüreğir ve Seri-82 kullanılmıştır. Denemedeki melezleme işlemleri 2001 Mart-Mayıs aylarında; tarla denemeleri ise Ekim 2002 - Temmuz 2003 tarihleri arasında yapılmıştır. Verilerin analiz edilmesi neticesinde bayrak yaprak genişliği için eklemeli varyans komponenti (D), bayrak yaprak genişliği ve bitki başına tane verimi bakımından dominantlık varyans komponentinin (H,) önemli olduğu tespit edildi. Dominantlık düzeyi (h2) ve düzeltilmiş dominantlık değerleri (H2) üzerinde çalışılan üç özellik içinde önemli bulunmuştur. (P < 0.01). Wr/Vr grafiği bakımından incelendiğinde bitki başına dane verimi ve bayrak yaprak genişliği karakterleri aşırı dominantlık değerleri gösterirken bayrak yaprak boyu karakteri kısmi dominantlık özelliği göstermişlerdir.Bayrak yaprak uzunluğu bayrak yaprak genişliği ile pozitif ve önemli korelatif ilişkiye sahip sahip olduğu bulunmuştur (r = 0.803). Yüreğir ve Malabadi genotiplerinin melez kombinasyonunun maksimum bayrak yaprak alanı için en uygun kombinasyon olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, M. B., DERE, Ş. (2022). 8x8 diallel ekmeklik buğday (T. aestivum L.) melez populasyonlarında bitki başına dane verimi, bayrak yaprak uzunluğu ve genişliğinin kalıtımı. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5, 339–345. https://ajindex.com/articles/599564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Athwal, D.S. 1968. Concept of plant type and disease resistance in rice breeding. Presidential address delivered at manual general meeting of Ind. Soc. Genet. Plant Breed. Jan 3, 1968.
  2. Bariga, P. 1980. Inheritance of photosynthetic areas above the flag node in spring wheat. Plant Breed. Absc. 50: 2712. Berdhal, J.D., D.C. Rasmusson and D.N. Moss. 1972. Effect of leaf area on photosynthetic rates, light penetration and grain yield in barley. Crop Sci. 20: 117-180.
  3. Busen, R.H., J.C. Janke and R.C. Fronberg. 1974. Evaluation of crosses among high and low yielding parents of spring wheat (T. aestivum L.) and bulk predictions of line performance. Crop Sci. 14: 47-50.
  4. Chowhry, M.A., I. Rasol, I. Khaliq, T. Mahmood and M.M. Gilani. 1999. Genetics of some metric traits in spring wheat under normal and drought environments. RACHIS., 8: 34-39.
  5. Chowhry, M.A., A. Ambreen and I. Khaliq. 2002. Genetic control of some polygenic traits in aestivum species. A. J. Plant Sci 3: 235-237.
  6. Crumpacker, D.W. and R.W. Allard. 1962. A diallel cross analysis of "heading date in wheat. Hilgardia 32: 275-318.
  7. Hayman, B.I. 1954. The theory and analysis of diallel analysis. Genetics 39:251-271. Hsu+.P and P.I. Walton. 1970. The inheritance of morph-physiological characters in spring wheat. Euphytica 19: 54-60.
  8. Ibrahim, H.A. and R.A. Elenein. 1977. The relative contribution of different wheat leaves and awns to the grain yield and its protein content. Z. Ack. Pflanz 144: 1-7.
  9. Iqbal, M., K. Alam and M.A. Chowdhry. 1991.Genetic analysis of plant height and the traits above flag leaf node in bread wheat. Sarhad " J. Agric.,7: 131-134. llyhchenko, V.G. 1977. Diallel analysis of leaf surface area in spring bread wheat. Plant Breed. Absc. 49: 8865. Jain, J.P. and R.B. Singh. 1976. Study of combining ability and genetic parameters for physico-morphological characters in bread wheat (iTriticum aestivum L). Egypt J. Genet. Cytol. 5: 109-118.
  10. Jinks, J.L. 1954. The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of nicotiona rustica varieties. Genetics 39: 767-788.
  11. Jinks, J.L. 1956. The F2 and backcross generations from a set of diallel crosses. Heredity 10: 1-30.
  12. Lupton, F.G.H. 1961. Studies in the breeding of self pollinating cereals. III. Further studies in cross prediction. Euphytica 10: 209-224.
  13. Lupton, F.G.H. 1973. Selection criteria determining yield in semi dwarf wheat varieties. Ann. Appl. Biol. 72: 47-50.
  14. Mahmood, N. and M.A. Chowdhry. 1999. Inheritance of some growth parameters in b