Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2009 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Maya ekstraktı üretiminde ekmek mayasının otolizi üzerine farklı sıcaklıkların etkisi

The effect of different temperatures on autolysis of baker's yeast for the production of yeast extract

Pages
149–154
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to sensory analysis, the sample with 0.5% yeast extract powder and the control had the highest overall acceptance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine the optimum autolysis conditions for the production of yeast extract, which is used to give a meaty flavor to food products and to increase their nutritional value.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Autolysis was induced by incubating baker’s yeast cell suspensions at different temperatures (45, 50, 55, and 60 °C) with a reaction time ranging from 8 to 72 h.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to sensory analysis, the sample with 0.5% yeast extract powder and the control had the highest overall acceptance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimum autolysis conditions for the production of yeast extract, which is used to give a meaty flavor to food products and to increase their nutritional value. Autolysis was induced by incubating baker’s yeast cell suspensions at different temperatures (45, 50, 55, and 60 °C) with a reaction time ranging from 8 to 72 h. Content and yield of total solids, α-amino nitrogen (α-AN), and protein were determined. Yeast extract powder was obtained by drying liquid yeast extract in a pilot scale spray drier. Sensory analysis was performed by adding the yeast extract powder at different concentrations (0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0%) to vegetable soup. Optimum temperature and time for the production of yeast extract was 50 °C for 24 h, based on α-AN content, which was 3.7%. Furthermore, under the same conditions, protein content was 52.5% and total solids content was 1.98%. According to sensory analysis, the sample with 0.5% yeast extract powder and the control had the highest overall acceptance. According to variance analysis, differences between total solids, α-AN, and protein content determined at 4 different temperatures, and interactions between duration and temperature were statistically significant (P < 0.01).

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, çeşitli gıdalara et aroması vermek ve besin içeriğini arttırmak amacıyla ilave edilen maya ekstraktı üretimi için en uygun otoliz koşullarını belirlemektir. Çalışmada, 8 saatten 72 saate değişen reaksiyon aralıklarında 45, 50, 55 ve 60 °C sıcaklıklarda ekmek mayası hücre süspansiyonlarına otoliz işlemi uygulanmıştır. Maya ekstraktlarında kuru madde, α-amino azot ve protein içeriği ve verimi belirlenmiştir. Toz maya ektraktı püskürtmeli kurutucuda sıvı maya ekstraktını kurutarak elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca, sebze çorbasına farklı oranlarda (% 0,5, % 1,0, % 1,5 ve % 2,0) toz maya esktraktı ilave edilerek duyusal analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Maya esktraktı üretimi için optimum sıcaklık ve süre, α - amino azot içeriği dikkate alınarak 50 °C’de 24 saat olarak saptanmıştır. Bu sıcaklık ve sürede α - amino azot içeriği % 3,7 olarak bulunmuştur. Aynı koşullarda protein içeriği % 52,5 ve kuru madde içeriği % 1,98 olarak belirlenmiştir. Duyusal analizde, % 0,5 toz maya ekstraktı ilavesi ve kontrol örneği daha yüksek oranda tercih edilmiştir. Varyans analizine göre, değerlendirilen dört sıcaklık arasında α - amino azot, protein ve kuru madde yanında sıcaklık ve süre arasındaki interaksiyon da istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuştur (P < 0,01).

🔖

Cite This Article

TANGÜLER, H., ERTEN, H. (2022). Maya ekstraktı üretiminde ekmek mayasının otolizi üzerine farklı sıcaklıkların etkisi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 149–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/599520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AOAC, 1990.
  2. Official methods of analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. K. Hekrich, 15th ed., Arlington, Virginia. Baker, C.D. 1991. Recommended methods of analysis. The Institute of Brewing. London. Barillere, J.M. and P. Benard. 1986. Examples d’interpretation de resultats de degustation. Conn. Vigne Vin. 20: 137-154.
  3. Behalova, B. and K. Beran. 1986. Autolysis of disintegrated cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Biotechnol. 6: 147-152.
  4. Bridson, E.Y. and A. Brecker. 1970. Yeast extract. In: Methods in Microbiology Vol.: 3A, (Eds.: J.R. Norris and D.W. Ribbons). Academic Press, London, pp. 229-295.
  5. Chae, H.J., Joo, H. and In, M.J., 2001. Utilization of brewer’s yeast cells for the production of food-grade yeast extract. Part I: Effects of different enzymatic treatments on solid and protein recovery and flavor characteristics. Biores Technol. 76: 253-258.
  6. Champagne, C.P., E.J. Barrett and J. Goulet. 1999. Interaction between pH, autolysis promoters and bacterial contamination on the production of yeast extracts. Food Res. Int. 32: 575-583.
  7. Conway, J., H. Gaudreau, and C.P. Champagne,, 2001. The effect of the addition of proteases and glucanases during yeast autolysis on the production and properties of yeast extracts. Can. J. Microbiol. 47: 18-24.
  8. Erten, H. and H. Tanguler. 2006. The production methods of yeast extract. Feedinfo News Service, Web page: http://www.feedinfo. com (16/01/2006).
  9. Göksungur, Y. 1993. Maya Ekstraktı Üretimi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Gıda Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Bornova, İzmir, p. 71. Gaudreau, H., C.P. Champagne, J. Conway and R. Degre, 1999. Effect of ultrafiltration of yeast extract on their ability to promote lactic acid bacteria growth. Can. J. Microbiol. 45: 891-897.
  10. Holder, M.G., 1977.
  11. Why yeast extracts are important, Food Processing Industry, 38. Nagodawithana, T. 1992. Yeast-derived flavours and flavour enhancers and their probable mode of action. Food Technol. 138-144.
  12. Nagodawithana, T. 1994. Savory flavours. In: Bioprocess Production of Flavour Fragrance and Color Ingredients (Ed. A. Gabelman), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 135-168.
  13. Özdamar, K. 1999. Paket Programlar İle İstatistiksel Veri Analizi, Kaan Kitabevi,
  14. Eskişehir. Peppler, H.J. 1982. Yeast extracts. In: Economic Microbiology, Vol.: 7, Academic Press, London, pp. 293-312.
  15. Roessler, E.B., R.M. Pangborn, J.L. Sidel and H. Stone, 1978. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance