Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Quality traits of green plums (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) at different maturity stages

Pages
655–663
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show the importance of green plums in the daily diet as a good source of total phenols and antioxidants, providing health-promoting effects in humans, with good edible properties at the pre-early development stage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fruits of 2 different plum cultivars (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) were collected in 2015 from 15-year-old trees in Hatay Province, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 2 plum cultivars (Can and Gül) were on their own roots.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show the importance of green plums in the daily diet as a good source of total phenols and antioxidants, providing health-promoting effects in humans, with good edible properties at the pre-early development stage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fruits of 2 different plum cultivars (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) were collected in 2015 from 15-year-old trees in Hatay Province, Turkey. The 2 plum cultivars (Can and Gül) were on their own roots. Fruits were picked 5 times (both Can and Gül) at 12-day intervals (12 April [t1], 24 April [t2], 6 May [t3], 18 May [t4], and 30 May [t5]) during maturation in 2015. Higher levels of health-promoting components with the capacity to prevent several diseases, such as phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity, were found in the Can fruits, whereas the Gül fruits were characterized by lower values. The amounts of individual sugars providing taste and the soluble sugar content of the fruits differed between the 2 cultivars, with glucose and fructose being higher in the Can variety. The results show the importance of green plums in the daily diet as a good source of total phenols and antioxidants, providing health-promoting effects in humans, with good edible properties at the pre-early development stage.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAYDAŞ, S. K., ZARIFIKHOSROSHAHI, M., BOZHAYDAR, O., SARIDAŞ, M. A., KAFKAS, E. (2022). Quality traits of green plums (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) at different maturity stages. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 655–663. https://ajindex.com/articles/599441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abbott JA (1999). Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol Tec 15: 207-225.
  2. Ayanoğlu H (1995). Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesinde Sofralık Erik Seleksiyonu. Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi,
  3. Adana, Turkey. Ayanoğlu H, Bayazit S, İnan G, Bakır M, Akpınar AE, Kazan K, Ergül A (2007). AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in Turkish green plum accessions (Prunus cerasifera L.) adapted to the Mediterranean region. Sci Hortic 114: 263-267.
  4. Bayır A (2007). Bazı Şaraplık Üzüm Çeşitlerine Ait Çekirdeklerin Toplam Fenolik Madde İçerikleri ve Antiradikal Aktivitelerinin Belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi,
  5. Antalya, Turkey. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239:70-76.
  6. Bozan B, Tunalıer Z, Koşar M, Altıntaş A, Başer KHC (1997). Comparison of ascorbic and citric acid contents in ‘Emphasis Type.’ Proc. 11. Symp Plant Origin Crude Drugs, Ankara.
  7. Campbell OE, Merwin IA, Padilla-Zakour OI (2013). Characterization and the effect of maturity at harvest on the phenolic and carotenoid content of northeast USA apricot (Prunus armeniaca) varieties. J Agr Food Chem 61: 12700-12710.
  8. Davarynejad GH, Zarei M, Nasrabadi ME, Ardakani E (2015). Effects of salicylic acid and putrescine on storability, quality attributes and antioxidant activity of plum cv. ‘Santa Rosa.’ J Food Sci Technol 52: 2053-2062.
  9. Davis PH (1972). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. IV. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. Díaz-Mula HM, Zapata PJ, Guillén F, Martínez-Romero D, Castillo S, Serrano M, Valero D (2009). Changes in hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant activity and related bioactive compounds during postharvest storage of yellow and purple plum cultivars. Postharvest Biol Tec 51: 354-363.
  10. Erkan M, Eski H (2012). Combined treatment of modified atmosphere packaging and 1- methylcyclopropene improves postharvest quality of Japanese plums. Turk J Agric For 36: 563-575.
  11. Guerra M, Casquero PA (2008). Effect of harvest date on cold storage and postharvest quality of plum cv. Green Gage. Postharvest Biol Tec 47: 325-332.
  12. Gündüz K, Saraçoğlu O (2012). Variation in total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. selections from Mediterranean region of Turkey. Sci Hortic 134: 88-92.
  13. Gould WA (1977).
  14. Food Quality Assurance. Westport, CT, USA: the AVI Publishing Company, Inc. Ishaq S, Rathore HA, Majeed S, Awan S, Zulfiqar-Ali-Shah S