Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

A modeling study with an artificial neural network: developing estimation models for the tomato plant leaf area

Pages
203–212
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the comparison made according to these criteria, it was concluded that the error values of the ANN model [R2= 0.96, RMSE = 3.30, MAE = 1.94, and MAPE = 0.05] were lower than those of the regression model [R2= 0.92, RMSE = 4.71, MAE = 3.31, and MAPE = 0.08], and that the ANN method provided a better fit to the actual values; therefore, the ANN model can be used as an alternative method in estimating the leaf area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The leaf area measurement is an important parameter in understanding the growth and physiology of a plant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The plant material for the study consisted of 420 leaf samples of the Typhoon F1 tomato type grown in plastic greenhouse conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the comparison made according to these criteria, it was concluded that the error values of the ANN model [R2= 0.96, RMSE = 3.30, MAE = 1.94, and MAPE = 0.05] were lower than those of the regression model [R2= 0.92, RMSE = 4.71, MAE = 3.31, and MAPE = 0.08], and that the ANN method provided a better fit to the actual values; therefore, the ANN model can be used as an alternative method in estimating the leaf area.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The leaf area measurement is an important parameter in understanding the growth and physiology of a plant. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the best leaf area estimation model for tomato plants grown in plastic greenhouse conditions. The artificial neural network (ANN) and regression analysis techniques were used in the formation of a leaf area estimation model by using the leaf width and leaf length measurements determined by the linear measurement method. The plant material for the study consisted of 420 leaf samples of the Typhoon F1 tomato type grown in plastic greenhouse conditions. In the comparison of the created models according to both methods, the criteria of selecting low values for the root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and high value for the determination coefficient (R2 ) were taken into account, and the best estimation models were determined. In the comparison made according to these criteria, it was concluded that the error values of the ANN model [R2= 0.96, RMSE = 3.30, MAE = 1.94, and MAPE = 0.05] were lower than those of the regression model [R2= 0.92, RMSE = 4.71, MAE = 3.31, and MAPE = 0.08], and that the ANN method provided a better fit to the actual values; therefore, the ANN model can be used as an alternative method in estimating the leaf area.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKÖNDER, H., AKYÜZ, A., BOYACI, S. (2022). A modeling study with an artificial neural network: developing estimation models for the tomato plant leaf area. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 203–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/599424

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aase JK (1978). Relationship between leaf area and dry matter in winter wheat. Agron J 70: 563–565. Akkaya G (2007). Artificial neural networks and their applications in agriculture. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 38: 195–202 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English). Astegiano ED, Favaro JC, Bouzo CA (2001). Estimation of leaf area in different cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Invest Agr: Prod Prot Veg 16: 249–256. Beyhan MA, Uzun S, Kandemir D, Ozer H, Demirsoy M (2008). A model for predicting leaf area in young and old leaves of greenhouse type tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) by linear measurements. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture OMU 23: 154–157. Blanco FF, Folegatti MV (2003). A new method for estimating the leaf area index of cucumber and tomato plants. Hortic Bras 21: 666–669. Blanco FF, Folegatti MV (2005). Estimation of leaf area for greenhouse cucumber by linear measurements under salinity and grafting. Sci Agric 62: 305–309. Caglar N (2009). Neural network based approach for determining the shear strength of circular reinforced concrete columns. Const Buil Mater 23: 3225–3232. Campostrini E, Yamanishi OK (2001). Estimation of papaya leaf area using the central vein length. Sci Agric 58: 39–42. Canakci M, Hosoz M (2006). Energy and exergy analyses of a diesel engine fuelled with various biodiesels. Energ Source Part B 1: 379–394. Celik H, Odabas MS, Odabas F (2011). Leaf area prediction models for highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) from linear measurements. Adv Food Sci 33: 16–21. Celik H, Uzun S (2002). Validation of leaf area estimation models (UZCELIK-I) evaluated for some horticultural plants. Pak J Bot 34: 41–46. Centritto ML, Massacci F, Pietrini A, Villani FMC, Zacchine M (2000). Improved growth and water use efficiency of cherry saplings under reduced light intensity. Ecol Res 15: 385–392. Cho YY, Oh S, Oh MM, Son JE (2007). Estimation of individual leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight of hydroponically grown cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) using leaf length, width, and SPAD value. Sci Hortic 111: 330–334. Cristofori VR, Gyves YEM, Bignami C (2007). A simple model for estimating leaf area of hazelnut from linear measurements. Sci Hortic 113: 221–225. Demirsoy H (2009). Leaf area estimation in some species of fruit tree by using models as a non-destructive method. Fruits 64: 45–51. Demirsoy H, Demirsoy L (2003). A validated leaf area prediction model for some cherry cult