Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

Labor requirements and work efficiencies of hazelnut harvesting using traditional and mechanical pick-up methods

Pages
301–310
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, the hazelnut harvesting machine can collect the amount that 6.74 people can collect traditionally

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was completed with the aim of determining labor requirements, work efficiencies, and total costs of 6 different traditional hazelnut pick-up methods, along with 3 different mechanical harvest methods using a portable-type pneumatic hazelnut harvesting machine, on flat ground in two hazelnut orchards with linear and brush planting systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Trials were conducted in the two different orchards in the August 2013 harvesting season.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, the hazelnut harvesting machine can collect the amount that 6.74 people can collect traditionally
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was completed with the aim of determining labor requirements, work efficiencies, and total costs of 6 different traditional hazelnut pick-up methods, along with 3 different mechanical harvest methods using a portable-type pneumatic hazelnut harvesting machine, on flat ground in two hazelnut orchards with linear and brush planting systems. Trials were conducted in the two different orchards in the August 2013 harvesting season. Among traditional pick-up methods, the lowest unit of human labor requirements (units of human labor power, h ha 1) in an orchard with a linear planting system was obtained (180.17 h ha 1) for the method involving Ethrel administration, hand-shaking, and rows gathered by garden rake (first method). For the brush-planting system orchard, the lowest value (157.39 h ha 1) was obtained with the method with no Ethrel administration, hand-shaking, and rows gathered by scrub rake (fourth method). In terms of work efficiencies, the best values were obtained (0.0056 ha h 1) for the first method for the linear system and for the third method for the brush system (0.0058 ha h 1). In terms of time utilization coefficient, the different pick-up methods with the hazelnut harvesting machine obtained lower levels compared to the different traditional hazelnut pick-up methods. In trials of different methods of traditional pick-up, the lowest value for total harvest costs was obtained for the method with Ethrel administered and rows gathered by garden rake in the linear system (first method) (6666.29 Turkish lira (TL) ha 1). For the brushplanting system the lowest value was for the fourth method with 5283.43 TL ha 1. In the brush-planting system with the mechanical pick-up method, the lowest value was 1637.42 TL ha 1 for the pick-up method with rows gathered by garden rake (third method). Amounts of hazelnuts obtained per unit of time for traditional methods were 5.25 kg h 1 for the first method in linear planting and 4.49 kg h 1 for the third method in the brush-planting system. For hazelnut harvesting machine pick-up, the amount was 35.40 kg h 1 for pick-up with rows gathered by garden rake (third method). Accordingly, the hazelnut harvesting machine can collect the amount that 6.74 people can collect traditionally

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, T. (2022). Labor requirements and work efficiencies of hazelnut harvesting using traditional and mechanical pick-up methods. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 301–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/599417

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Aktaş AR, Öztürk E, Hatırlı SA (2011). Analysis of profit inefficiencies in Turkish hazelnut agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17: 230–240 (in Turkish with abstract in English). Beyhan MA (1992). Ülkemiz koşullarına uygun aspiratörlü bir fındık hasat makinasının tasarım ve imalatı. PhD, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish). Beyhan MA (1996). The determination of the possibility of using an eccentric type limb shaker in the mechanical harvesting of the hazelnut. In: Proceedings of the Agricultural Education 150th Anniversary, Hazelnut and Other Nuts Symposium, 10–11 January 1996, Ondokuz Mayıs University Agriculture Faculty, Samsun, Turkey, pp. 212–225. Beyhan MA, Pınar Y (1996). An investigation of using a mechanical scrub-clearing tool at desuckering of hazelnut. In: Proceedings of the Agricultural Education 150th Anniversary, Hazelnut and Other Nuts Symposium, 10–11 January 1996, Ondokuz Mayıs University Agriculture Faculty, Samsun, Turkey, pp. 119–133. Beyhan MA, Yıldız T (1996). Methods in applied mechanical harvesting of hazelnut and other nuts. In: Proceedings of the Agricultural Education 150th Anniversary, Hazelnut and Other Nuts Symposium, 10–11 January 1996, Ondokuz Mayıs University Agriculture Faculty, Samsun, Turkey, pp. 183–194. Bolli P, Scotton M (1987). Lineamenti di tecnica della meccanizzazione agricola. 1st ed. Bologna, Italy: Edagricole (in Italian). Caran D (1994). Zeytinde mekanik hasat olanaklarının araştırılması. PhD, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey (in Turkish). Dinçer H (1976). Tarım İşletmelerinde Makina Kullanma Masrafları. Ankara, Turkey: Türkiye Zirai Donatım Kurumu Mesleki Yayınları (in Turkish). Güner M, Dursun E, Dursun IG (2003). Mechanical behaviour of hazelnut under compression loading. Biosyst Eng 85: 485–491. İlkyaz H (1986). Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde Çay ve Fındığın Üretim Girdi ve Maliyetleri. Samsun, Turkey: Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları (in Turkish). Kadayıfçılar S, Dinçer H (1972). Ziraat Makinaları İşletmeciliği II. Cilt. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish). Kadayıfçılar S, Erdoğan D (1988).
  2. Meliorasyon Makinaları. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish). Keskin R, Erdoğan D (1992). Tarımsal Mekanizasyon. 2nd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish). KİBGS (2008). Karadeniz İhracatçı Birlikleri Genel Sekreterliği Kayıtla