Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

Band-application of phosphorus with farm manure improves phosphorus use efficiency, productivity, and net returns of wheat on sandy clay loam soil

Pages
319–326
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, band-placement of P at 104 kg P2 O5 ha 1 with FM improved yield, PUE, and net returns of wheat sown on sandy clay loam calcareous soils.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) is very low in alkaline calcareous soils; however, it can be improved by using suitable application methods along with farm manure (FM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present field study was conducted to optimize phosphorus (P) levels and application methods in order to maximize wheat yield, PUE, and net returns on calcareous soils with and without FM application.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, band-placement of P at 104 kg P2 O5 ha 1 with FM improved yield, PUE, and net returns of wheat sown on sandy clay loam calcareous soils.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) is very low in alkaline calcareous soils; however, it can be improved by using suitable application methods along with farm manure (FM). The present field study was conducted to optimize phosphorus (P) levels and application methods in order to maximize wheat yield, PUE, and net returns on calcareous soils with and without FM application. Five P soil solution levels, i.e. 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.30 mg P L 1, were maintained according to the Freundlich model through the application of 0, 36, 61, 104, and 142 kg P2 O5 ha 1, respectively. The calculated P (0, 36, 61, 104, and 142 kg P2 O5 ha 1) was applied by broadcasting, band-placement, and top-dressing, with or without 300 kg ha 1 well-rotted FM. The results revealed that the bandplacement technique at 104 kg P2 O5 ha 1 improved PUE and wheat output with and without FM application. Furthermore, wheat grain and straw P uptake was high at 142 kg P2 O5 ha 1. In addition, protein content and Olsen P were high at 142 kg P2 O5 ha 1. The band-placement technique at 104 kg P2 O5 ha 1 increased net returns and the cost/benefit ratio. FM application further augmented the productivity, PUE, and net returns under various P levels and application techniques. In conclusion, band-placement of P at 104 kg P2 O5 ha 1 with FM improved yield, PUE, and net returns of wheat sown on sandy clay loam calcareous soils.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, H., ZIA-UL-HAQ, M., HUSSAIN, M., HUSSAIN, S., REHIM, A., NOREEN, S., AHMAD, S. (2022). Band-application of phosphorus with farm manure improves phosphorus use efficiency, productivity, and net returns of wheat on sandy clay loam soil. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 319–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/599393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmad N, Rashid M (2003). Fertilizers and their use in Pakistan. Extension Bulletin. Islamabad, Pakistan: NFDC. Ahmad N, Saleem MT, Twyford IT (1992). Phosphorus research in Pakistan—a review. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Role of Phosphorus in Crop Production. Islamabad, Pakistan: NFDC, pp. 59-92.
  2. Alam SM, Latif A, Ibal Z (1994). Phosphorus-zinc interaction in wheat and maize crops. In: Proceedings of the 4th National Congress of Soil Science, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 239-243.
  3. Alam SM, Shah SA, Akhter M (2003). Varietal differences in wheat yield and phosphorus use efficiency as influenced by method of phosphorus application. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 25: 175-181.
  4. Belay A, Claassens AS, Wehner FC, De Beer JM (2001). Influence of residual manure on selected nutrient elements and microbial composition of soil under long-term crop rotation. South Afr J Plant Soil 18: 1-6.
  5. Byerlee D (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer’s Recommendations: An Economic Training Manual. El Batan, Mexico: CIMMYT. pp. 23-33.
  6. Channabasanagowda N, Patil KB, Patil BN, Awaknavar JS, Ninnganur BT, Hunje R (2008). Effect of organic manures on growth, seed yield and quality of wheat. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 21: 366-368.
  7. Chapman DH, Pratt PF (1961).
  8. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California. Cisse L, Amar B (2000). The importance of phosphate fertilizer for increased crop production in developing countries. In: AFA 6th International Annual Conference, 31 January–2 February 2000,
  9. Cairo, Egypt. Cook RJ, Veseth RJ (1991).
  10. Wheat Health Management. St. Paul, MN, USA: The American Phytopathological Society. Daniel TC, Sharpley AN, Lemunyon JL (1998). Agricultural phosphorus and eutrophication: a symposium overview. J Environ Qual 27: 251-257.
  11. Delgado A, Uceda I, Andreu L, Kassem S (2002). Fertilizer phosphorus recovery from gypsum-amended reclaimed calcareous marsh soils. Arid Land Res Manage 16: 319-334.
  12. Fageria NK, Baliger VC, Jones CA (1997). Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker. Fox RL (1981). External phosphorus requirement of crops. In: Shelly M, editor. Chemistry in the Soil Environment. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 223-239.
  13. Government of Pakistan (2003). Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Economic Wing. Grant C, Bittman S, Montreal M, Plenchette C