Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6

Characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) hybrids and their potential use in further breeding

Pages
813–824
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Factorial and PC analyses revealed that large variation exists regarding the evaluated tree and fruit characteristics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pomegranate is an important fruit species, with increasing consumption and production in recent years throughout the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Arising from the crosses, 3118 lines were developed, and 67 were considered for important traits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Factorial and PC analyses revealed that large variation exists regarding the evaluated tree and fruit characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Pomegranate is an important fruit species, with increasing consumption and production in recent years throughout the world. In Turkey, Hicaznar, which was originally developed through selective breeding, is the most highly produced and exported cultivar. To isolate lines with improved productivity and quality, Hicaznar was selfed, open-pollinated, or crossed with the sweet pomegranate cultivars Ernar and Fellahyemez. Arising from the crosses, 3118 lines were developed, and 67 were considered for important traits. These 67 pomegranate genotypes, from different crosses, were compared with their parents, which are commercially important pomegranate genotypes regarding tree and fruit traits. Twenty-one morphological characteristics were evaluated to cover the present genetic variations within the investigated materials using principal component analysis (PCA). Simple correlation analyses showed significant positive and negative correlations for certain important characteristics. Factorial and PC analyses revealed that large variation exists regarding the evaluated tree and fruit characteristics.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, K., ŞAHİN, A. (2022). Characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) hybrids and their potential use in further breeding. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 6, 813–824. https://ajindex.com/articles/599385

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ataseven E, Çelik M (2006). Similarities between pomegranate parents and crosses regarding some fruit characteristic. 1st International Symposium on Pomegranate and Minor Mediterranean Fruits, 16–19 October 2006;
  2. Adana, Turkey, pp. 229-232.
  3. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (1989). Multivariate Analysis Methods. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag. Barone E, Caruso T, Marra FP, Sottile F (2001). Preliminary observations on some Sicilian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties. J Amer Pomolog Soc 55: 4-7.
  4. Bartual J, Valders G, Andreu J, Lozoya A, Garcia J, Badenes ML (2012). Pomegranate improvement through clonal selection and hybridization in Elche. II. International Symposium on the Pomegranate, Options Mediterraneans: Serie A. Seminaires Mediterraneens 103: 71-74.
  5. Bist HS, Srivastava R, Sharma G (1994). Variation in some promising selections of wild pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Hort J 7: 67-70.
  6. Boz Y (1988). Research on the morphological and pomological characteristics of some important pomegranate varieties grown in Şanlıurfa. Master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Science and Technology, Samsun, Turkey. Brooks RM, Olmo HP (1978) Register of new fruit and nut varieties. HortScience 13: 522-532.
  7. Dokuzoğuz M, Mendilcioğlu K (1978). Pomological studies on pomegranate varieties in Aegean Sea Region. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ege University 15: 133-159.
  8. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th ed. London, UK: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd. Gündoğdu M, Yılmaz H, Şensoy RIG, Gündoğdu Ö (2010). Pomological traits of pomegranate grown in Sirvan (Siirt) Region. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 20: 138-143 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English). Gündoğdu M, Yılmaz H (2012) Organic acid, phenolic profile and antioxidant capacities of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars and selected genotypes. Sci Hortic 143: 38-42.
  9. Hussein MAH, Hussein MAS (1972). Suitability of pomegranate varieties for processing. Assuit J Ag Sci 3: 303-307.
  10. Jalikop SH (2009). Breeding of pomegranate and annonaceous fruits. II. International Symposium on Pomegranate and Minor Mediterranean Fruits, 23–27 June 2009;
  11. University of Agricultural Science, Daharwad, India. Kafyrova NM (2003). Introduced pomegranate varieties in southern Dagestan. Sadovodstvoi Vinogradarstvo 2: 23-28.
  12. Karale AR, Desai UT (2000). Study of heterosis for fruit characters in inter cultivar crosses of pomegranate