Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6

Evaluation of disease intensity and molecular identification of Zymoseptoria tritici causing Septoria leaf blotch on wheat in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey

Pages
405–413
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest disease prevalence (87.99%) was recorded at Adana and followedby Osmaniye with 87.44%, Kahramanmaraş (43.59%), Mersin (42.68%), and Hatay (26.03%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Wheat is one of the most important crops in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study,260 different wheat fields were surveyed for the estimation of prevalence and severity of Septoria leaf blotch.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest disease prevalence (87.99%) was recorded at Adana and followedby Osmaniye with 87.44%, Kahramanmaraş (43.59%), Mersin (42.68%), and Hatay (26.03%).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Wheat is one of the most important crops in Turkey. Production of this crop is constrained by the disease Septorialeaf blotch, which is a major bottleneck in wheat production in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. In this study,260 different wheat fields were surveyed for the estimation of prevalence and severity of Septoria leaf blotch. Out of 100%of the total wheat crop fields, 58.91% were infected with this disease. The mean value of Septoria leaf blotch virulence was11.62%. Out of 142 diseased wheat crop samples, 74 isolates were used for the pathogenicity test. Forty-seven isolates fromAdana, 3 isolates from Mersin, 3 isolates from Osmaniye, 14 isolates from Hatay, and 7 isolates from Kahramanmaraşprovinces were cultured on PDA plates. The cause of disease agent was identified based on microscopic observation ofmorphological structure and molecular analysis methods. Consequently, total 15 virulent isolates, 3 isolates from eachprovince were sequenced for 5′ and 3′ ends of ITS of rDNA and nBLAST of the ITS sequences revealed that Zymoseptoriatritici was the agent of Septoria leaf blotch. The highest disease prevalence (87.99%) was recorded at Adana and followedby Osmaniye with 87.44%, Kahramanmaraş (43.59%), Mersin (42.68%), and Hatay (26.03%).

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYIM, M., AY, T., ÜNAL, G., YONES, A. M. (2022). Evaluation of disease intensity and molecular identification of Zymoseptoria tritici causing Septoria leaf blotch on wheat in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6, 405–413. https://ajindex.com/articles/599332

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abebe T, Mehari M, Legesse M (2015). Field response of wheat genotypes to Septoria tritici blotch in Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 5: 1-8.
  2. Agrios GN (1997). Plant Pathology, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 244-256.
  3. Allioui N, Siah A, Brinis L, Reignault P, Halama P (2016). Identification of QoI fungicide-resistant genotypes of the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici in Algeria. Phytopathol Mediterr 55: 89-97.
  4. Beck JJ, Ligon JM (1994). Polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of Stagonospora nodorum and Septoria tritici in wheat. Phytopathology 85: 319-324.
  5. Bockus WW, Bowden RL, Hunger RM, Morrill WL, Murray TD, Smiley RW (2010). Compendium of Wheat Diseases and Pests, 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society, pp. 43-44.
  6. Boukef S, McDonald BA, Yahyaoui A, Rezgui S, Brunner PC (2012). The frequency of mutations associated with fungicide resistance and population structure of Mycosphaerella graminicola in Tunisia. Eur J Plant Pathol 132: 111-122.
  7. Castro AC, Simon MR (2016). Effect of tolerance to Septoria tritici blotch on grain yield, yield components and grain quality in Argentinean wheat cultivars. Crop Protection 90: 66-76.
  8. Cenis JL (1992). Rapid extraction of fungal DNA for PCR amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 2380. Eyal Z (1999). The Septoria/Stagonospora blotch disease of wheat: past, present, and future. In: Van Ginkel M, McNab A, Krupinsky J, editors. Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals: A Compilation Research. Mexico: CIMMYT, pp. 171- 181. Eyal Z, Brown MB (1976). A quantitative method for estimating the density of Septoria tritici pycnidia on wheat leaves. Phytopathology 66: 11-14.
  9. Eyal Z, Scharen AL, Huffman MD, Prescott JM (1985). Global insights into virulence frequencies of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology 75: 1456-1462.
  10. Finci S (1982). Marmara Bölgesinde buğday ekim alanlarında görülen Septoria fungusunun türleri, yayılışları ve çeşit reaksiyonları üzerinde çalışmalar. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 22: 72-88 (in Turkish). Fraaije BA, Lovell DJ, Coelho JM, Baldwin, Hollomon DW (2001). PCR-based assays to assess wheat varietal resistance to blotch (Septoria tritici and Stagonospora nodorum) and rust (Puccinia striiformis and Puccinia recondita) diseases. Eur J Plant Pathol 107: 905-917.
  11. Gilchrist L, Dubin HJ (2002). Septoria diseases of wheat. In: Curtis BC, Rajaram S, Gómez MH, editors. Bread Wheat Improvement, and Production. FAO Plant Production and Protecti