Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Employing an analytic hierarchy process to prioritize factors influencing surface roughness of wood and wood-based materials in the sawing process

Pages
364–371
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that feed speed, tooth shape andgeometry, and cutting speed are the most important factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper focuses on the prioritization of factors having substantial effects on the surface roughness of wood and wood-basedmaterials in the sawing process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the model, four main factors were defined: cutting tool properties, machining parameters, woodstructure and properties, and cutting phenomena.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that feed speed, tooth shape andgeometry, and cutting speed are the most important factors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper focuses on the prioritization of factors having substantial effects on the surface roughness of wood and wood-basedmaterials in the sawing process. Within the model, four main factors were defined: cutting tool properties, machining parameters, woodstructure and properties, and cutting phenomena. Furthermore, each main factor was subdivided into various subfactors. The analytichierarchy process method was proposed to obtain the priorities of the factors. The results showed that feed speed, tooth shape andgeometry, and cutting speed are the most important factors. Based on the obtained results, it can be said that the most important factorscan be easily determined by the proposed method. Consequently, this study presents a road map for the wood industry to achieve a highquality surface.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZŞAHİN, Ş., SİNGER, H. (2022). Employing an analytic hierarchy process to prioritize factors influencing surface roughness of wood and wood-based materials in the sawing process. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 364–371. https://ajindex.com/articles/599300

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abdollahzadeh G, Damalas CA, Sharifzadeh MS, Ahmadi-Gorgi H (2016). Selecting strategies for rice stem borer management using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Crop Prot 84: 27- 36. Aguilera A (2011). Cutting energy and surface roughness in medium density fiberboard rip sawing. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 69: 11- 18. Ahammed F, Azeem A (2013). Selection of the most appropriate package of solar home system using analytic hierarchy process model in rural areas of Bangladesh. Renew Energ 55: 6-11.
  2. Albayrak E, Erensal YC (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: an application of multiple criteria decision making problem. J Intell Manuf 15: 491-503.
  3. Aminbakhsh S, Gunduz M, Sonmez R (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. J Safety Res 46: 99-105. Aragonés-Beltrán P, Chaparro-González F, Pastor-Ferrando JP, Pla-Rubio A (2014). An AHP (analytic hierarchy process)/ ANP (analytic network process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy 66: 222-238.
  4. Aydin I, Colakoglu G (2005). Effects of surface inactivation, high temperature drying and preservative treatment on surface roughness and colour of alder and beech wood. Appl Surf Sci 252: 430-440.
  5. Azizi M (2008). A model of supplying poplar wood for Iranian paper & wood factories. J Forestry Res 19: 323-328.
  6. Azizi M, Modarres M (2011). A decision making model for investment and development of construction panels. J Forestry Res 22: 301-310.
  7. Azizi M, Momeni E, Mohebbi N (2012). Providing a decision-making model for importing medium-density fiberboard product. J Indian Acad Wood Sci 9: 115-129.
  8. Budakçı M, İlçe AC, Korkut DS, Gürleyen T (2011). Evaluating the surface roughness of heat-treated wood cut with different circular saws. BioResources 6: 4247-4258.
  9. Burdurlu E, Usta İ, Ulupınar M, Aksu B, Erarslan TÇ (2005). The effect of the number of blades and the grain size of abrasives in planing and sanding on the surface roughness of European black pine and Lombardy poplar. Turk J Agric For 29: 315-321. Csanády E, Magoss E, Tolvaj L (2015). Quality of Machined Wood Surfaces. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Fuentes-Bargues JL, Ferrer-Gisbert PS (2015). Selecting a small runof-river hydropower plant by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study of Miño-Sil river basin, Spain. Ecol Eng 85: 307-316. Hadidi LA,