Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Banded herbicide application in a conventional sunflower production system

Pages
354–363
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that banded application ofglyphosate is safe and effective in sunflowers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Banded herbicide applications with hooded field sprayers (HFS) provide safer applications in many crops.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Glyphosate interrow and aclonifen or quizalofop-P-ethyl intrarow wereapplied in fields cropped with nonglyphosate-resistant sunflower varieties in Ankara, Tekirdağ, and Tokat Provinces of Turkey in 2015and 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that banded application ofglyphosate is safe and effective in sunflowers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Banded herbicide applications with hooded field sprayers (HFS) provide safer applications in many crops. The aim of this paperis to show the effectiveness and safeness of selective and nonselective herbicide applications in a conventional sunflower productionsystem (CSPS) using a combined hooded field sprayer (CHFS). Glyphosate interrow and aclonifen or quizalofop-P-ethyl intrarow wereapplied in fields cropped with nonglyphosate-resistant sunflower varieties in Ankara, Tekirdağ, and Tokat Provinces of Turkey in 2015and 2016. In Ankara and Tekirdağ, glyphosate caused limited injury to sunflower at 28 days after treatment (DAT), and aclonifen createdtransient phytotoxicity in 2015. Glyphosate was applied with aclonifen at 1.44 + 0.75 and 2.88 + 0.75 kg ai $ha^{–1}$ or quizalofop-P-ethyl1.44 + 0.05 and 2.88 + 0.05 kg ai $ha^{–1}$ using band application units of CHFS together. Aclonifen and quizalofop-P-ethyl were also usedat 0.75 and 0.05 kg ai $ha^{–1}$, respectively, using the conventional application unit of CHFS. Glyphosate + aclonifen (1.44 + 0.75 and 2.88 +0.75 kg ai $ha^{–1}$) provided higher weed control and sunflower seed yield compared with the other treatments. Aclonifen (0.75 kg ai $ha^{–1}$)controlled many competitive arable weeds and increased sunflower seed yield, except in Tokat in 2016, where common cocklebur waspresent in the field, which is not in the range of aclonifen. Weed control by glyphosate + quizalofop-P-ethyl (1.44 + 0.05 and 2.88 + 0.05kg ai $ha^{–1}$) was limited because broadleaf weeds covered the sunflower fields where the trials were conducted. Quizalofop-P-ethyl (0.05kg ai $ha^{–1}$) alone and untreated control were associated with the lowest sunflower seed yield. It is concluded that banded application ofglyphosate is safe and effective in sunflowers. Applying glyphosate with aclonifen and quizalofop-P-ethyl with CHFS helps to save timeand money, and mitigate $CO_2$ emission.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, E., ASAV, Ü., SERİM, A. T., TÜRKSEVEN, S. G. (2022). Banded herbicide application in a conventional sunflower production system. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 354–363. https://ajindex.com/articles/599268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Alonso-Prados JL, Hernandez-Sevillano E, Lianos S, Villarroya M, Gardia-Baudin JM (2002). Effects of sulfosulfuron soil residues on barley (Hordeum vulgare), sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and common wetch (Vicia sativa). Crop Prot 21: 1061-1066.
  2. Arshad M, Amjad M (2012). Medicinal use of sunflower oil and present status of sunflower in Pakistan: A review study. Science, Technology and Development 31: 99-106.
  3. Başaran S, Serim AT, Asav Ü (2017). Determination of the yield reductions and economic threshold caused by common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) in sunflower production fields in Ankara. Plant Prot Bull 57: 251-262 (article in Turkish with an English abstract). Burnett RB (2017). Pinching and spacing effects on cut sunflower (Helianthus annuus) production in East Texas. MSc, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX, USA. Carballido J, Rodríguez-Lizana A, Agüera J, Pérez-Ruiz M (2013). Field sprayer for inter- and intra-row weed control: Performance and labor savings. Span J Agric Res 11: 642-651.
  4. Çoruh İ, Zengin H (2009). Determination of the critical period of weed control in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Proceedings of the III Weed Science Congress in Van, Turkey, p. 282. DeFelice MS, Oliver LR (1980). Redvine and trumpetcreeper control in soybeans and grain sorghum. Arkansas Farm Res 29: 5. Đurišić-Mladenović N, Kiss F, Škrbića B, Tomićb M, Mićićc R, Predojevića Z (2018). Current state of the biodiesel production and the indigenous feedstock potential in Serbia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81: 280-291.
  5. Eadie AG, Swanton CJ, Shaw JE, Anderson GW (1992). Banded herbicide applications and cultivation in a modified no-till corn (Zea mays) system. Weed Technol 6: 535-542.
  6. Griffin JL, Clay PA, Miller DK, Grymes DF, Hanks JE (2012). Bermudagrass control in sugarcane with glyphosate and a hooded sprayer. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 32: 38-50.
  7. Henry WB, Shaner DL, West MS (2007). Shikimate accumulation in sunflower, wheat, and proso millet after glyphosate application. Weed Sci 55: 1-5.
  8. Kaya Y, Jocic S, Miladinovic D (2012). Sunflower. In: Gupta SK, editor. Sunflower in Technological Innovations in Major World Oil Crops, Vol. 1. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, pp. 85- 129. Kaya Y, Kaya V, Şahin İ, Üstün Kaya M, Evci G, Çıtak N (2008). The future potential of oleic type sunflower in Turkey. Proceedings of the 17th International Sunflower Conference, June 8-12;
  9. Cordoba, Spain. International Sunflower Association