Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Design and development of a front mounted on-the-go soil strength profile sensor

Pages
151–163
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Dynamic tests revealed thatthe sensor was capable of monitoring the soil strength through the profile in order to determine the compaction level and hardpan depth.Moreover, the sensor was capable of adopting itself to crop varieties that have different critical compaction levels for root penetration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Soil compaction is a great problem since it affects crop growth and yield.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mechanical frame of the sensor (body) was designed using Solidworks 3D CAD Design Software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Dynamic tests revealed thatthe sensor was capable of monitoring the soil strength through the profile in order to determine the compaction level and hardpan depth.Moreover, the sensor was capable of adopting itself to crop varieties that have different critical compaction levels for root penetration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Soil compaction is a great problem since it affects crop growth and yield. The causes of soil compaction are the managementpractices in agricultural production. A common practice is to implement subsoiling at a few centimeters below the hardpan.Management practices, field traffic, and variations of the soil’s physical and chemical properties throughout the field cause variations inthe soil compaction degree and depth. Subsoiling at certain depths can cause excessive energy consumption at a high cost. Therefore,agricultural tillage equipment could be improved by varying the tillage depth. Soil strength is the main indicator that depends on severalsoil properties such as bulk density, moisture, and organic soil texture content for determining the compaction level. The goal of thisstudy was to develop an on-the-go sensor. It measured soil strength at multiple depths in order to determine the depth of the compactedsoil layers. The mechanical frame of the sensor (body) was designed using Solidworks 3D CAD Design Software. Depth measurementswere based on the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) system. The data-gathering algorithm was developed with Phoenix ContactPC WORX software. It recorded the data flowing from the load cells, calculated the depth of the hardpan, and altered the depth of thechisel. In order to calibrate the load cell and compensate for differences among the load cells, static tests were conducted in a laboratory.The consistency of the sensing tips in terms of the input load – output load harmony was in linear format with higher R2 values rangingbetween 0.98 and 0.99. Consequently, the on-the-go soil sensor was developed for variable depth subsoiling. Dynamic tests revealed thatthe sensor was capable of monitoring the soil strength through the profile in order to determine the compaction level and hardpan depth.Moreover, the sensor was capable of adopting itself to crop varieties that have different critical compaction levels for root penetration.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, H., TEKİN, A. B. (2022). Design and development of a front mounted on-the-go soil strength profile sensor. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 151–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/599258

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Alimardani R (2005). Design and construction of a tractor mounted penetrometer. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences 1: 297- 300. ASABE (2010). ASABE Standards: Standards Engineering Practices Data. St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. ASAE (2002). ASABE Standards: Procedures for Using and Reporting Data Obtained with the Soil Cone Penetrometer (EP542). St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. ASAE (2004). ASABE Standards: Standards Engineering Practices Data. St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. Bengough AG, Mullins CE (1990). Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J Soil Sci 41: 341-358.
  2. Çakır E, Gülsoylu E, Yalçın H, Aykas E (2007). Soil compaction: causes, consequences, solutions and effects on Turkish farming system. In: Proceedings of Soil Dynamics Workshop, 14–15 June 2007,
  3. İzmir,
  4. Turkey. İzmir, Turkey: Agricultural Machinery Department of Ege University, pp. 47-58.
  5. Chukwu E, Bowers CG (2005). Instantaneous multiple-depth soil mechanical impedance sensing from a moving vehicle. T ASAE 48: 885-894.
  6. Chung SO, Sudduth KA (2003a). Modeling Soil Failure Caused by Prismatic and Conical Tools. ASAE Paper No. 031028. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. Chung SO, Sudduth KA (2003b). Characterization of Soil Strength Data for an On-the-Go Sensor. ASAE Paper No. MC03203. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. Chung SO, Sudduth KA (2006). Soil failure models for vertically operating and horizontally operating strength sensors. T ASABE 49: 851-863.
  7. Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Hummel JW (2003). On-the-Go Soil Strength Profile Sensor Using a Load Cell Array. ASAE Paper No. 031071. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE.Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Hummel JW (2006). Design and validation of an on-the-go soil strength profile sensor. T ASABE 49: 5-14.
  8. Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Motavalli PP, Kitchen NR (2004a). Relating On-the-Go-Soil Strength Data to Cone Index. ASAE Paper No. MC04205. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE. Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Plouffe C, Kitchen NR (2004b). Evaluation of an On-the-Go Soil Strength Profile Sensor Using Soil Bin and Field Data. ASAE Paper No. 041039. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE. Chung SO, Sudduth KA, Tan J (2005). Variability Structure of Onthe-Go Soil Strength Sensor Data. ASAE Paper No. 051039. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE. Cockroft B, Barley KP, Greacen EL (1969). The penetration of clays by fine probes and