Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of morphoagronomic performance and selection indices in the international safflower panel for breeding perspectives

Pages
103–120
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During this study, a few promising safflower accessions were selected for future breedingprograms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Developing high yielding safflower cultivars with good adaptation to diverse environmental conditions can improve productionin terms of seed yield and reduce the deficiency in edible oil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 94 safflower accessions from 26 different countries were usedin this study to evaluate morphoagronomic performance, determine the pattern of similarity centers, and identify the best performingaccessions by conducting 2 field experiments in Pakistan and Turkey using augmented design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During this study, a few promising safflower accessions were selected for future breedingprograms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Developing high yielding safflower cultivars with good adaptation to diverse environmental conditions can improve productionin terms of seed yield and reduce the deficiency in edible oil. The genetic variability that exists among and within populations fordesirable agronomic traits can be used to develop elite cultivars. A total of 94 safflower accessions from 26 different countries were usedin this study to evaluate morphoagronomic performance, determine the pattern of similarity centers, and identify the best performingaccessions by conducting 2 field experiments in Pakistan and Turkey using augmented design. Genetic diversity for important yield andyield traits was described including capitulum diameter (17.30 to 28.30 mm), branches per plant (5.10 to 17.30), capitula per plant (8.70to 80.40), and seed yield per plant (4.86 to 51.02 g). These analyses showed a good level of variation in the current study. Using principalcomponent analysis, it was observed that days to flower initiation, days to 50% flowering, days to flower completion, seed yield per plant,capitula per plant, branches per plant, seeds per capitulum, and capitulum diameter were the major contributors to the observed geneticvariability in the evaluated safflower panel. Seed yield per plant reflected a significant and positive correlation with capitula per plant,branches per plant, and capitulum diameter, and these traits can be suggested as a selection criterion in safflower breeding programs.The hierarchical clustering was in agreement with the patterns of 7 similarity centers based on seed yield per plant, capitula per plant,capitulum diameter, and branches per plant. During this study, a few promising safflower accessions were selected for future breedingprograms.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, Y., ALI, F., NADEEM, M. A., RABBANI, M. A., NAWAZ, M. A., YILMAZ, A., HABYARIMANA, E., CHAUDHARY, H. J., BALOCH, F. S. (2022). Investigation of morphoagronomic performance and selection indices in the international safflower panel for breeding perspectives. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 103–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/599177

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abebe D, Bjornstad A (1996). Genetic diversity of Ethiopian barley in relation to geographical regions, altitude range and agro-ecological zones as an aid to germplasm collection and conservation strategy. Hereditas 124: 17-29.
  2. Ali F, Yılmaz A, Nadeem MA, Habyarimana E, Subaşı I et al. (2019). Mobile genomic element diversity in world collection of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) panel using iPBSretrotransposon markers. PLoS One 14 (2). doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0211985
  3. Arslan B (2007). The path analysis of yield and its components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Biological Sciences 7 (4): 668-672.
  4. Asare PA, Galyuon IKA, Sarfo JK, Tetteh JP (2011). Morphological and molecular based diversity studies of some cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) germplasm in Ghana. African Journal of Biotechnology 10 (63): 13900-13908.
  5. Ashri A (1975). Evaluation of the germplasm collection of safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L. V. Distribution and regional divergence for morphological characters. Euphytica 24 (3): 651-659.
  6. Ashri A, Zimmer DE, Urie AL, Knowles PF (1975). Evaluation of the germplasm collection of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.): VI. Length of planting to flowering period and plant height in Israel, Utah and Washington. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 46 (7): 359-364.
  7. Bagawan I, Ravikumar RL (2001). Strong undesirable linkages between seed yield and oil components-a problem in safflower improvement. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Safflower Conference; Sidney, MT, USA. pp. 103-107.
  8. Bagheri A, Yazdani-Samadi B, Taeb M, Ahmadi MR (2001). Study of correlations and relation between plant yield and quantitative other trait in safflower. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 32: 295-307.
  9. Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, Shahid MQ, Çiftçi V, de Miera LE et al. (2017). A whole genome DArTseq and SNP analysis for genetic diversity assessment in durum wheat from central Fertile Crescent. PLoS One 12: e0167821. Baloch FS, Karaköy T, Demirbaş A, Toklu F, Özkan H et al. (2014). Variation of some seed mineral contents in open pollinated faba bean (Vicia faba L.) landraces from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38 (5): 591-602.
  10. Bidgoli AM, Akbari GA, Mirhadi MJ, Zand ED, Soufizadeh S (2006). Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phenological traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Euphytica 148 (3): 261-268.
  11. Bradley VL, Guenthner RL, Johnson RC, Hannan RM (1999). Evaluation of saffl