SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

The comparison of botanical composition and the condition and health class of different rangeland sites in forest ecosystem

Emre ÇOMAKLI
M. Kerim GÜLLAP
Adnan BİLGİLİ
Tuğba ÇOMAKLI
Pages
349–355
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, although the grass and legume rations in the forest edge rangeland was lower, the others families’ ratio was higher than that of the other sites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study conducted in Erzurum province’s Oltu district Kırdağı location during 2015, 2016 and 2017 concerning the above forest, forest interior and forest edge rangeland sites, the botanical composition of rangeland sites, canopy coverage rate, rangeland condition scores, and comparison of the condition of rangeland and the health class were emphasized.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence, it was determined that the ratio of canopy coverage rate was higher in the forest top rangelandsite compared to other sites.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, although the grass and legume rations in the forest edge rangeland was lower, the others families’ ratio was higher than that of the other sites.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study conducted in Erzurum province’s Oltu district Kırdağı location during 2015, 2016 and 2017 concerning the above forest, forest interior and forest edge rangeland sites, the botanical composition of rangeland sites, canopy coverage rate, rangeland condition scores, and comparison of the condition of rangeland and the health class were emphasized. According to the results, although the grass and legume rations in the forest edge rangeland was lower, the others families’ ratio was higher than that of the other sites. Hence, it was determined that the ratio of canopy coverage rate was higher in the forest top rangelandsite compared to other sites. Consequently, the health class of the rangeland is in the risky class in the forest edge site. Rangeland status class, which is a comparison of vegetation for climax, was found to be weak in this site. As a result, these values clearly indicate that the forest edge rangeland was seriously damaged compared to the other sites.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOMAKLI, E., GÜLLAP, M. K., BİLGİLİ, A., ÇOMAKLI, T. (2022). The comparison of botanical composition and the condition and health class of different rangeland sites in forest ecosystem. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 349–355. https://ajindex.com/articles/599137

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Açıkgöz E (2001).
  2. Yem Bitkileri. Bursa, Turkey: Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayınları (in Turkish). Allred BW, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE, Taylor CA (2012). Herbivore species and grazing intensity regulate community composition and an encroaching woody plant in semi-arid rangeland. Basic and Applied Ecology 13 (2): 149-158.
  3. Alp S, Ercisli S, Dogan H, Temim E, Leto A et al. (2016). Chemical composition and antioxidant activity Ziziphora clinopodioides ecotypes from Turkey. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 21: 11298-11303.
  4. Altın M, Gökkuş A, Koç A (2011).
  5. Çayır ve Mera Yönetimi. Ankara, Turkey: Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları (in Turkish). Avcıoğlu R, Tung T, Akbari N, Özel N(1996). Seferihisar Yöresi Orman içi ve Orman Kenarı Doğal Meralarının Islahı Olanakları Üzerinde Ön Araştırmalar. Ankara, Turkey: Orman Bakanlığı, Ege Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü (in Turkish). Bakır Ö (1987).
  6. Çayır-Mera Amenajmanı. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish). Bakoğlu A (1999). Otlatılan ve Korunan İki Farklı Mera Kesiminin Bazı Toprakve A Comparison for some vejetations and soil properties in crazed and closed range areas. MSc, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH (1998). Forest Ecology. 4th ed. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons. Belsky AJ, Blumenthal DM (1997). Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the interior West. Conservation Biology 11 (2): 315-327.
  7. Bremm C, Carvalho PC, Fonseca L, Amaral GA, Mezzalira JC et al. (2016). Diet switching by mammalian herbivores in response to exotic grass invasion. PLoS ONE 11 (2): 1-16.
  8. Bilgili A (2016). Effects of cattle grazing on the scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantations in Northeastern Anatolia Region (Oltu, Erzurum). PhD, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Bilgili A, Koç A. (2020). Determination of some vegetation characteristics in forest gap rangelands of Sarıkamış. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 51(1): 88-96 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Can M, Ayan İ (2017). Some feature and yield changes depending on growth periods on cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) populations. Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 20 (2): 160-166 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Chartier MP, Rostogno CM, Roig FA (2009). Soil erosion rates in rangelands of n