Journals / The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A Service Oriented Architecture to Integrate Mobile Assessment In Learning Management Systems

Pages
202–221
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Agents’ layer presents the suggested required software agents to serve the overall system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mobile Learning (M-Learning) is an approach to E-Learning that utilizes mobile devices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper presents a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) to integrate mobile assessment in LMS.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Agents’ layer presents the suggested required software agents to serve the overall system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mobile Learning (M-Learning) is an approach to E-Learning that utilizes mobile devices. Learning Management System (LMS) should enable M-Learning. Unfortunately, MLearning is not the same at each educational institution. Assessment is one of the learning activities that can be achieved electronically and via mobile device. Mobile assessment relies on services that are not part of the LMS. Integrating different external systems and services to be virtually part of LMS is one of integration challenges. This paper presents a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) to integrate mobile assessment in LMS. Proposed Architecture consists of two layers: Interface layer, and Service layer. Interface layer interacts with instructors and learners via portals, and with external organization services via Web services. Service layer contains core system services and has three sub layers: - Orchestration, - Application Services, and - Agents layer. Orchestration layer is the layer that holds business logic required by system processes. Application Services layer contains set of stateless services that are capable of performing certain tasks. Agents’ layer presents the suggested required software agents to serve the overall system. Suggested agents are Analyzer and Tracker. Analyzer is required to analyze students assessments to detect learning deficiencies. Tracker agent tracks students to remind with missing assessments. SOA facilitated integration of software agents within LMS, and implementation of new processes to support learning.

🔖

Cite This Article

RIAD, A. M., El-GHAREEB, H. A. (2022). A Service Oriented Architecture to Integrate Mobile Assessment In Learning Management Systems. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 202–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/598077

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bai, X., Dai, G., Xu, D. & Tsai, W., “A Multi-Agent Based Framework for Collaborative Testing on Web Services”, Fourth IEEE Workshop on Software Technologies for Future Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems and Second International Workshop on Collaborative Computing, Integration, and Assurance (SEUS-WCCIA’06), IEEE - 0- 7695-2560-1/06. Barry, D., “Web Services and Service-Oriented Architecture: The Savvy Manager's Guide”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003, ISBN:1558609067. Billings, D., “Conversations in E-Learning”, Pohl Publishing, 2003, ISBN-13: 978-0971749917.
  2. Black, P. & Wiliam, D., “Inside the Black Box”, London: King's College, 1998.
  3. Booth, D., Haas, H., McCabe, F., Newcomer, E., Champion, M., Ferris, C., Orchard, D., “Web Services Architecture” [Online], W3C, February 11, 2004. - April 18, 2007, http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch
  4. Chairman, V., “A Glossary of e-Learning terms and acronyms” [Online], eLearning Network, March 3, 2007, http://www.elearningnetwork.org/articles/article9.doc.
  5. Chappuis, S., “Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders”, Assessment Training Institute, 2004, ISBN-13: 978-0965510141.
  6. Chinnici, R., Moreau, J., Ryman, A. & Weerawarana, S., “Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language” [Online], W3C, March 26, 2007, April 18, 2007, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20
  7. Connolly, T. and Begg, C., “Database Systems: A Practical Approach to Design, Implementation and Management”, Addison-Wesley, 2004.
  8. Cowan, J. & Tobin, R. “XML Information Set (Second Edition)” [Online], W3C, February 4, 2004, April 18, 2007, http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset
  9. Duffy, T., and Kirkley R., “LEARNER-CENTERED THEORY AND PRACTICE IN DISTANCE EDUCATION”, LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, 2004, ISBN: 0-8058-4577-1.
  10. Earl, L., “Assessment As Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning”, Corwin Press, 2003, ISBN-13: 978-0761946267.
  11. Ellis, A., “Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Together: The Reflective Classroom”, Eye on Education, 2001, ISBN-13: 978-1930556034.
  12. Erl, T., “Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design”, Prentice Hall PTR, 2005, ISBN: 0-13-185858-0.
  13. Fischer, G. & Konomi, S., “Innovative Media in Support of Distributed Intelligence and Lifelong Learning”, 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE’05), IEEE- 0-7695-2385-4/05. Gardner, J., ”Assessment and Learning”, London: Sage, 2006,
  14. Assessment Reform Group Publications, ISBN 1-4129-1051-X.