SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders

Ercan KULAK
Muhammet Enis EKİNCİOĞLU
Yavuz UYAR
Belgin TUTAR
Güler BERKİTEN
Semih KARAKETİR
Ziya SALTÜRK
Ayşe Enise GÖKER
Melis Ece ARKAN
Pages
26–32
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theresults of the two tests were then compared.Results: The QOD-parosmia (QOD-P), QOD-statements of QoL (QOD-LQ), and QOD-visual analog scale (QOD-VAS) values weresignificantly higher in the study group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD).Patients and Methods: This prospective study was conducted between June 2018 and January 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty patients (24 males, 16 females;mean age 42.3±13.7 years; range, 18 to 71 years) with olfactory disorders (anosmia, hyposmia) completed the QOD at the timeof diagnosis and one day prior to surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theresults of the two tests were then compared.Results: The QOD-parosmia (QOD-P), QOD-statements of QoL (QOD-LQ), and QOD-visual analog scale (QOD-VAS) values weresignificantly higher in the study group (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD).Patients and Methods: This prospective study was conducted between June 2018 and January 2019. Patients who presentedto Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital outpatient clinic with a diagnosis of chronic sinusitis and/or septum deviationcompleted the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center smell test. Forty patients (24 males, 16 females;mean age 42.3±13.7 years; range, 18 to 71 years) with olfactory disorders (anosmia, hyposmia) completed the QOD at the timeof diagnosis and one day prior to surgery. Forty volunteers (control group) (22 males, 18 females; mean age 38.3±13.4 years;range, 18 to 65 years) without nasal pathology, olfactory dysfunction or a history of head trauma also completed the QOD. Theresults of the two tests were then compared.Results: The QOD-parosmia (QOD-P), QOD-statements of QoL (QOD-LQ), and QOD-visual analog scale (QOD-VAS) values weresignificantly higher in the study group (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KULAK, E., EKİNCİOĞLU, M. E., UYAR, Y., TUTAR, B., BERKİTEN, G., KARAKETİR, S., SALTÜRK, Z., GÖKER, A. E., ARKAN, M. E. (2022). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 26–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/597907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Wysocki CJ, Gilbert AN. National Geographic Smell Survey. Effects of age are heterogenous. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1989;561:12-28
  2. Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, Reiter ER. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:497-503
  3. Yilmaz Y, Karakas Z, Uzun B, Sen C, Comoglu S, Orhan KS, et al. Olfactory dysfunction and quality of life in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:3417-21
  4. Oladokun D, Baumgart A, Baumann I, Bulut OC. Quality of life gain after septorhinoplasty: an analysis of health utility and cost utility values associated with septorhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018;42:1618-24
  5. Yang Z, Li W, Tu X, Tang W, Messing S, Duan L, et al. Validation and psychometric properties of Chinese version of SF-36 in patients with hypertension, coronary heart diseases, chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer. Int J Clin Pract 2012;66:991-8
  6. Frasnelli J, Hummel T. Olfactory dysfunction and daily life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:231-5
  7. Yang D, Wang J, Ni D, Liu J, Wang X. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders (QOD) when used with patients having olfactory dysfunction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:3255-61
  8. Choi WR, Jeong HY, Kim JH. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018;8:1481-5
  9. Hoover KC. Smell with inspiration: the evolutionary significance of olfaction. Am J Phys Anthropol 2010;143:63-74
  10. Temmel AF, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B, Klimek L, Stoller E, Hummel T. Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:635-41
  11. Brämerson A, Nordin S, Bende M. Clinical experience with patients with olfactory complaints, and their quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:167-74
  12. Kłosiński M, Tomaszewski KA, Tomaszewska IM, Kłosiński P, Skrzat J, Walocha JA. Validation of the Polish language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Agric Environ Med 2014;21:866-70
  13. Nordin S, Murphy C, Davidson TM, Quiñonez C, Jalowayski AA, Ellison DW. Prevalence and assessment of qualitative olfactory dysfunction in different age groups. Laryngoscope 1996;106:739-44
  14. Smeets MAM, Veldhuizen MG, Galle S, Gouweloos J, de Haan AJA, Vernooij J, et al.