SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Subjective and Objective Success of Septoplasty in Patients with Nasal Septum Deviation: A Before and After Study

Erhan DEMİRHAN
Aytekin UZER
Pages
25–33
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant difference between pre and postoperative NOSE scores, with a mean difference of 53.17 points (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Aim of the study is to evaluate the subjective outcomes and objective outcomes postoperatively and investigate correlations between these measurements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The study population consisted of 30 patients, including 19 males and 11 females, with a median age of 27.5 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant difference between pre and postoperative NOSE scores, with a mean difference of 53.17 points (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Aim of the study is to evaluate the subjective outcomes and objective outcomes postoperatively and investigate correlations between these measurements. Material and Methods: This prospective before and after surgical study was conducted with patients admitted with symptomatic nasal septum deviation (NSD) and who underwent Cottle’s septoplasty. Morphometric diameters of the nasal cavity were measured using a multi-detector computed tomography. Preoperative and postoperative one-month Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale (NOSE) score, acoustic rhinometry (AR), and anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) measurements were used to evaluate the success of surgery. The correlations between these measurements were also evaluated. Results: The study population consisted of 30 patients, including 19 males and 11 females, with a median age of 27.5 years. There was a statistically significant difference between pre and postoperative NOSE scores, with a mean difference of 53.17 points (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRHAN, E., UZER, A. (2022). Comparison of Subjective and Objective Success of Septoplasty in Patients with Nasal Septum Deviation: A Before and After Study. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 25–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/597886

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Konstantinidis I, Triaridis S, Triaridis A, Karagiannidis K, Kontzoglou G. Long term results following nasal septal surgery. Focus on patients’ satisfaction. Auris, Nasus, Larynx 2005;32(4):369-74.
  2. Tsang CLN, Nguyen T, Sivesind T, Cervin A. Long-term patientrelated outcome measures of septoplasty: a systematic review. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino- Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2018;275(5):1039-48.
  3. Sedaghat AR, Busaba NY, Cunningham MJ, Kieff DA. Clinical assessment is an accurate predictor of which patients will need septoplasty. Laryngoscope 2013;123(1):48-52.
  4. Shah J, Roxbury CR, Sindwani R. Techniques in Septoplasty: Traditional Versus Endoscopic Approaches.Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018;51(5):909-17.
  5. Hsu HC, Tan CD, Chang CW, Chu CW, Chiu YC, Pan CJ, et al. Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective oneyear follow-up cohort study.Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42(1):53-9.
  6. Moore M, Eccles R. Objective evidence for the efficacy of surgical management of the deviated septum as a treatment for chronic nasal obstruction: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2011;36(2):106-13.
  7. Fettman N, Sanford T, Sindwani R. Surgical management of the deviated septum: techniques in septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42(2):241-52.
  8. Kim JS, Heo SJ. Questionable Effect of Crosshatching Incision in Septoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2020;13(1):47-51.
  9. Most SP, Rudy SF. Septoplasty: Basic and Advanced Techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2017;25(2):161-9.
  10. Mondina M, Marro M, Maurice S, Stoll D, de Gabory L. Assessment of nasal septoplasty using NOSE and RhinoQoL questionnaires. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269(10):2189-95. Sahin C. Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Nasal Septoplasty Operation Using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Score Questionnaire. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27(5):1289- 91. Floyd EM, Ho S, Patel P, Rosenfeld RM, Gordin E. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Evaluating Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes with the NOSE Score. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;156(5):809-15. Mladina R. The role of maxillary morphology in the development of pathological septal deformities. Rhinology. 1987;25(3):199-205.
  11. Aksu F GMN, Kahveci O, Cırpan