SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat / 2022 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

A Novel Method of Hybrid Ossiculoplasty: Ionomer Bone Cement Coated Mastoid Cortical Bone

Dastan Temirbekov
Cengiz Celikyurt
Pages
25–30
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be easily eliminated one of the major disadvantages of mastoid cortical bone by coating it with ionomer bone cement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The development of otologic surgical techniques has significantly improved the functional results of surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The study presented a retrospective, consecutive case series of twelve patients who underwent revision surgery as type IV tympanoplasty using Mastoid cortical bone coated with ionomer bone cement in our institution between January 2013 and December 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be easily eliminated one of the major disadvantages of mastoid cortical bone by coating it with ionomer bone cement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ossiculoplasty · graft material · mastoid cortical bone graft

Abstract

Objective: The development of otologic surgical techniques has significantly improved the functional results of surgery. However, the issue of the most effective ossiculoplasty material is still controversial. The study aimed to introduce a novel method of autologous ossiculoplasty, using “ionomer bone cement coated mastoid cortical bone” and to assess short-term and long-term results of this method. Material and Methods: The study presented a retrospective, consecutive case series of twelve patients who underwent revision surgery as type IV tympanoplasty using Mastoid cortical bone coated with ionomer bone cement in our institution between January 2013 and December 2019. Coating with ionomer bone cement was performed to prevent the autograft from sticking to the surrounding bone tissue. The short- and long-term auditory functions and otologic examination findings of the patients were analyzed. Results: Physical examination findings were satisfactory. Except one, all patients had a significant improvement in hearing outcomes, and the late-term results were also satisfactory. An average long term audiological gain of 19.9 dB (± 8.7 SD) was found. Conclusion: A novel method of Hybrid Ossiculoplasty: Ionomer Bone Cement Coated Mastoid Cortical Bone is an effective and safe method of ossiculoplasty. It can be easily eliminated one of the major disadvantages of mastoid cortical bone by coating it with ionomer bone cement.

🔖

Cite This Article

Temirbekov, D., Celikyurt, C. (2022). A Novel Method of Hybrid Ossiculoplasty: Ionomer Bone Cement Coated Mastoid Cortical Bone. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 25–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/597873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Yu Z, Zhang L, Han D. Long-term outcome of ossiculoplasty using autogenous mastoid cortical bone. J Laryngol Otol 2014;128(10):866-70. google scholar 2. Ulku CH, Avunduk MC, Uyar Y, Arbag H. Biocompatibility of vitallium as ossicular reconstruction material in the middle ear: experimental animal study. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125(1):38-42. google scholar 3. Kim HH, Wiet RJ. Preferred technique in ossiculoplasty. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;14:243-6. google scholar 4. Morris DP, Wong L, van Wijhe RG, Bance ML. Effect of adhesion on the acoustic functioning of partial ossicular replacement prostheses in the cadaveric human ear. J Otolaryngol 2006;35(1):22-5. google scholar 5. Faramarzi M, Jahangiri R, Roosta S. Comparison of Titanium vs. Polycel total ossicular replacement prosthesis. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;28(85):89-97. google scholar 6. Kong JS, Jeong CY, Shim MJ, Kim WJ, Yeo SW, Park SN. Comparative study of new autologous material, bone-cartilage composite graft, for ossiculoplasty with Polycel® and Titanium. Clin Otolaryngol 2018;43(2):434-9. google scholar 7. Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E. Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: A statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 2001;22(3):299-304. google scholar 8. Goyal R, Mourya A, Qureshi S, Sharma S. Modified Radical Mastoidectomy with Type III Tympanoplasty: Revisited. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;68(1):52-5. google scholar 9. Lucidi D, De Corso E, Paludetti G, Sergi B. Quality of life and functional results in canal Wall down vs canal Wall up mastoidectomy. ActaOtorhinolaryngol Ital 2019;39(1):53-60. google scholar 10. Alaani A, Raut VV. Kurz titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty--follow-up statistical analysis of factors affecting one year hearing results. Auris Nasus Larynx 2010;37(2):150-4. google scholar 11. Truy E, Naiman AN, Pavillon C, Abedipour D, Lina-Granade G, Rabilloud M. Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2007;28(4):492-8. google scholar 12. Choi YS, Shin SO. Results of hearing outcome according to the alloplastic ossicular prosthesis materials. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;70(2):184-7. google scholar 13. Lahlou G, Sonji G, De Seta D, et al. Anatomical and functional results of ossiculoplasty using titanium prosthesis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2018;38(4):377-83. google scholar 14. Moon IS, Song MH, Kim HN, Chung MH, Lee WS, Lee HK. Hearing results after ossiculoplasty using Polycel prosthesis. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127(1):20-4.