Journals / The European Research Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

The factors affecting surgical success rate for the patients with congenital esotropia

Pages
33–38
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, fixation preference and mean preoperative deviation found to be related with surgical failure (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To evaluate the factors and preoperative clinical features affecting surgical success rate in patients with congenital esotropia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The medical files of patients who underwent surgery for congenital esotropia between June 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, fixation preference and mean preoperative deviation found to be related with surgical failure (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the factors and preoperative clinical features affecting surgical success rate in patients with congenital esotropia. Method. The medical files of patients who underwent surgery for congenital esotropia between June 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Data from the patients' full ophthalmological examination included visual acuity, ocular alignment, duction, versions and sensory tests for binocularity, cycloplegic retinoscopy and fundus evaluation. Presence of previous ambliyopia treatment, fixation preference, cross-fixation, anisometropia >1.5D, ocular motility abnormalities were noted. The relationship of these variables with the surgical success rate was evaluated. Result. A total of 48 patients (25 female,52.1%) were included. The mean age of the patients was 4.4±5.2 years. Successful surgical outcome was achieved in 39 (81.3%). All the patients were followed for 14.1±4.4 months. There was no relation between surgical success and patients' gender, positive family history, consanguinity, previous ambliyopia treatment, anisometropia, abnormal ocular motility and cross-fixation and mean cycloplegic refraction (p>0,05). However, fixation preference and mean preoperative deviation found to be related with surgical failure (p

🔖

Cite This Article

CAKMAK, S., AKAL, A., GONCU, T., ADİBELLİ, F. M., DİLMEN, F. (2022). The factors affecting surgical success rate for the patients with congenital esotropia. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 33–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/597835

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Mohney BG, Greenberg AE, Diehl NN. Age at strabismus diagnosis in an incidence cohort of children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:467-9
  2. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology;2006
  3. Chew E, Remaley NA, Tamboli A, Zhao J, Podgor MJ, Klebanoff M. Risk factors for esotropia and exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1349-5
  4. Rutstein R, Daum K. Anomalies of binocular vision: diagnosis and management. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Inc; 1998:205-17
  5. Scheiman MM, Wick B. Optometric management of infantile esotropia: Problems in optometry. Ped Optom. 1990;2:459-79
  6. Trigler L, Siatkowski RM. Factors associated with horizontal reoperation in infantile esotropia. J AAPOS. 2002;6:15-20
  7. Vroman DT, Hutchinson AK, Saunders RA, Wilson ME. Two muscle surgery for congenital esotropia: rate of reoperation in patients with small versus large angles of deviation. J AAPOS. 2000;4:267-270
  8. Keenan JM, Willshaw HE. Outcome of strabismus surgery in congenital esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:342-345
  9. Simonsz HJ, Kolling GH. Best age for surgery for infantile esotropia. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2011;15:205-208
  10. Rajavi Z, Ferdosi AA, Eslamdoust M, Yaseri M, Haftabadi N, Kroji S, Sheibani K. The prevalence of reoperation and related risk factors among patients with congenital esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2013;50:53-9
  11. Wright KW, Edelman PM, McVey JH, Terry AP, Lin M. Highgrade stereoacuity after early surgery for congenital esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:913-919
  12. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Spontaneous resolution of earlyonset esotropia: experience of the congenital esotropia observational Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:109-18
  13. Yusufoglu EE, Cinar FGY, Somer D, Burcu A, Akkaya ZY, Örnek F. Infantil Ezotropyada Cerrahi Basariyi Etkileyen Faktörler. Turk J Ophthalmol 2013;43:413-8
  14. Louwagie CR, Diehl NN, Greenberg AE, Mohney BG. Longterm follow-up of congenital esotropia in a population-based cohort. J AAPOS. 2009;13:8-12
  15. Knapp P, Moore S. Diagnostic procedures in an orthoptic evaluation. Am Orthopt J. 1962;12:63-9
  16. Zipf RF. Binocular fixation pattern. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976;94:401-5
  17. Hakim OM. Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2007;44:174-7
  18. Friedman DS, Katz J, Repka MX, et al. Lack of concordance between fixation prefere