Journals / The European Research Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5

Frequency of physical therapy in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

Pages
781–786
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Alternatively twice a day or alternate day therapies can be applicable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study is conducted to compare the three different frequency of the physical therapy applicationfor knee osteoarthritis in female patients.Methods: Consecutive 89 female patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized into three groups ofphysical therapy as twice-daily, once-a-day and alternate day, by computerized random number generator.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Weused Visual Analog Scale (VAS); to determine pain level, Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC); to determine osteoarthritis (OA) severity, 10-meter walking test (WD); to determine walking speedand Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire; to determine the quality of life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Alternatively twice a day or alternate day therapies can be applicable.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study is conducted to compare the three different frequency of the physical therapy applicationfor knee osteoarthritis in female patients.Methods: Consecutive 89 female patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized into three groups ofphysical therapy as twice-daily, once-a-day and alternate day, by computerized random number generator. Weused Visual Analog Scale (VAS); to determine pain level, Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC); to determine osteoarthritis (OA) severity, 10-meter walking test (WD); to determine walking speedand Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire; to determine the quality of life. All groups received a total of 10 physicaltherapy sessions including hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound (US) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS). We evaluated subjects at the beginning, at the end of treatment and at the third month control at posttreatment period.Results: Improvement was observed in all groups after treatment (p 0.05), alternate day group showed asignificant improvement (p < 0.05).Conclusions: In the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, usually once-a-day physical therapy approach is preferredin daily practice. Alternatively twice a day or alternate day therapies can be applicable.

🔖

Cite This Article

Murat, S., İçağasıoğlu, A., Yumuşakhuylu, Y., Gençoğlu, Z., Kesiktaş, N., Altınbilek, T. (2022). Frequency of physical therapy in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 5, 781–786. https://ajindex.com/articles/597580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bennell KL, Hunter DJ, Hinman RS. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ 2012;345:e4934
  2. Cimmino MA, Sarzi-Puttini P, Scarpa R, Caporali R, Parazzini F, Zaninelli A, et al. Clinical presentation of osteoarthritis in general practice: determinants of pain in Italian patients in the AMICA study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2005;35:17- 23
  3. Elders MJ. The increasing impact of arthritis on public health. J Rheumatic 2000;60:6-8
  4. Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JW, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG, et al; European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). EULAR recommendations for the nonpharmocolagical core management of hip and knee osteoarthristis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1125-35
  5. Yildiz SK, Özkan FÜ, Aktaş I, Silte AD, Kaysin MY, Badur NB. The effectiveness of ultrasound treatment for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebocontrolled, double-blind study. Turk J Med Sci 2015;45:1187-91
  6. McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:363-88
  7. Jevsevar DS, Brown GA, Jones DL, Matzkin EG, Manner PA, Mooar P, et al; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based guideline on: treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, 2nd edition. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1885-6. [8] 9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Osteoarthritis. GC177. NICE, 2014
  8. Buttgereit F, Burmester GR, Bijlsma JW.Non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis: where are we now and where do we need to go? RMD Open 2015;1:e000027
  9. Cetin N, Aytar A, Atalay A, Akman MN. Comparing hot pack, short-wave diathermy, ultrasound, and TENS on isokinetic strength, pain, and functional status of women with osteoarthritic knees: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:443-51
  10. Sarıfakıoğlu B, Güzelant AY, Özduran E. [The comparision of the effectiveness of short wave diathermy and ultrasound in the treatment of gonarthrosis]. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 2014;20:16-20. [Article in Turkish] [12] Tüzün EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Dağkapan A, Bayramoğlu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13:28-33
  11. Shubert TE, Schrodt LA, Mercer VS, Busby-Whitehead J, Giuliani CA. Are scores on balance screening tests assoc