Journals / The European Research Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The prognostic role of Charlson comorbidity index for critically ill elderly patients

Pages
67–72
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be used as a prognostic markerfor elderly patients in critical care.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Comorbidities represent a risk factor for adverse events in several critical illnesses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim ofthis study was to identify the relationship between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with mortality andlength of stay (LOS) in critically ill elderly patients.Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of patients admitted to our tertiary adult intensive care unit (ICU)between January 2015 and January 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be used as a prognostic markerfor elderly patients in critical care.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Comorbidities represent a risk factor for adverse events in several critical illnesses. The aim ofthis study was to identify the relationship between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with mortality andlength of stay (LOS) in critically ill elderly patients.Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of patients admitted to our tertiary adult intensive care unit (ICU)between January 2015 and January 2016. The impact of comorbidity was evaluated with the CCI. Otherrequired data were retrieved from the patients' follow-up records.Results: The study included a total of 251 patients. The mean age was 78.79 ± 6.70 years. The total mortalityrate was 41.0%. The most common cause for admission was sepsis and acute respiratory failure (18.3% vs18.3%). The median APACHE II score was significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors (31.0 [13.0-47.0] vs 21.0 [9.0-40.0]; p 3 had higher mortality than those with CCI ≤ 3 (p < 0.05). The odds ratio of the APACHE II scorefor mortality was 1.214 (95% CI: 1.154-1.276), and for CCI it was 1.320 (95% CI: 1.088-1.602). There was asignificant positive correlation between CCI and LOS (r = 0.147; p = 0.020).Conclusions: CCI is strongly associated with both mortality and LOS. It can be used as a prognostic markerfor elderly patients in critical care.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldız, A., Benli, A. R., Yiğit, A. (2022). The prognostic role of Charlson comorbidity index for critically ill elderly patients. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 67–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/597517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Zimmerman JE, Alzola C, Von Rueden KT. The use of benchmarking to identify top performing critical care units: a preliminary assessment of their policies and practices. J Crit Care 2003;18:76-86
  2. Orsini J, Butala A, Salomon S, Studer S, Gadhia S, Shamian B, et al. Prognostic factors associated with adverse outcome among critically ill elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15:889-94
  3. Talib S, Sharif F, Manzoor S, Yaqub S, Kashif W. Charlson comorbidity index for prediction of outcome of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Iran J Kidney Dis 2017;11:115-23
  4. Burch JB, Augustine AD, Frieden LA, Hadley E, Howcroft TK, Johnson R, et al. Advances in geroscience: impact on healthspan and chronic disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69 Suppl 1:S1-3
  5. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373- 83
  6. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-82
  7. Núñez JE, Núñez E, Fácila L, Bertomeu V, Llàcer A, Bodí V, et al. [Prognostic value of Charlson comorbidity index at 30 days and 1 year after acu]te myocardial infarction]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2004;57:842-9. [Article in Spanish] 8. Tripathy S, Mishra JC, Dash SC. Critically ill elderly patients in a developing world--mortality and functional outcome at 1 year: a prospective single-center study. J Crit Care 2014;29:474.e7-13
  8. Pisani MA. Considerations in caring for the critically ill older patient. J Intens Care Med 2009;24:83-95
  9. Falsetti L, Viticchi G, Tarquinio N, Silvestrini M, Capeci W, Catozzo V, et al. Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of inhospital death in acute ischemic stroke among very old patients: a single-cohort perspective study. Neurol Sci 2016;37:1443-8
  10. Chelluri L, Pinsky MR, Donahoe MP, Grenvik A. Long-term outcome of critically ill elderly patients requiring intensive care. JAMA 1993;269:3119-23
  11. Zekry D, Loures Valle BH, Lardi C, Graf C, Michel JP, Gold G, et al. Geriatrics index of comorbidity was the most accurate predictor of death in geriatric hospital among six comorbidity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1036-44
  12. Buntinx F, Niclaes L, Suetens C, Jans B, Mertens R, Van den Akker