Journals / The European Research Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The quality of life of the elderly is negatively affected by pertrochanteric femoral fractures: a comparative study

Pages
24–30
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the importance of hip fracture prevention was demonstrated by this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Limited data is available regarding the quality of life of hip fracture patients following surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examined the mid-term quality of life of hip fracture patients and compared these patients with healthy elderly patients devoid of hip fractures.Methods: A total of 103 patients (aged > 65 years) with pertrochanteric femoral fractures were treated with proximal femoral nail surgery in our clinic between January 2012 and December 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the importance of hip fracture prevention was demonstrated by this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Limited data is available regarding the quality of life of hip fracture patients following surgery. This study examined the mid-term quality of life of hip fracture patients and compared these patients with healthy elderly patients devoid of hip fractures.Methods: A total of 103 patients (aged > 65 years) with pertrochanteric femoral fractures were treated with proximal femoral nail surgery in our clinic between January 2012 and December 2016. A healthy control group (n = 100) was demographically matched to the patients. The final follow-up visit included their Harris Hip Score and completion of a Short Form-36. The eight sub-parameters from the Short Form-36 form were also assessed.Results: The mean follow-up time for the patients was 36.4 ± 12.3 (range, 24-72) months. The mean Charlson comorbidity score for the patient group was 4.4 ± 2.1 and the mean Harris Hip Score was 77.24 ± 10.2. The comparison of the Short Form-36 sub-parameters revealed that the quality of life of the patient group was found to be lower than that of the control group for the following parameters physical function, physical roles, vitality, and social function (p < 0.05).Conclusions: Even if the fracture had healed of patients with hip fractures, QoL related to physical and social functions was not improved accordingly, new healthcare policies should be developed for these patients based on the premise that their physical capacity may not be fully regained. Moreover, the importance of hip fracture prevention was demonstrated by this study.

🔖

Cite This Article

YARADILMIŞ, Y. U., OKKAOĞLU, M. C., DEMİRKALE, İ., ATEŞ, A., ÖZDEMİR, E., ALTAY, M. (2022). The quality of life of the elderly is negatively affected by pertrochanteric femoral fractures: a comparative study. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 24–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/597358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, et al. Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb Measuring Recovery After a Hip Fracture 301 among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 1996;7:612-8
  2. Gullberg B, O Johnell, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int 1997;7:407-13
  3. Johns WL, Strong B, Kates S, Patel NK. POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring in hip fracture mortalities. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2020;11:2151459320931674
  4. Kuru T, Olçar HA. Effects of early mobilization and weight bearing on postoperative walking ability and pain in geriatric patients operated due to hip fracture: a retrospective analysis. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50:117-25
  5. Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, Ricci C, Virgili G, Salanti G, et al. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. Ameta-analysis and metaregression of over 190,000 patients. PloS One 2012;7:e46175
  6. Karakoyun Ö, Erol M, Küçükkaya M, Demirok M. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures treatment with proximal femoral nail. Int J Basic Clin Med 2014;1;165-70
  7. Albayrak A, Bayrak SK, Duramaz A, Kızılkaya C, Seller A, Aslantaş FÇ. [Demographic and clinical results of proximal femoral fractures]. Acta Medica Alanya 2017;1:145-8. [Article in Turkish] 8. Müller M, Seitz A, Besch L, Hilgert RE, Seekamp A. [Proximal femur fractures: results and complications after osteosynthesis with PFN and TGN]. Unfallchirurg 2008;111:71-7. [Article in German] 9. Kalem M, Kocaoğlu H, Şahin E, Kocaoğlu MH, Başarır K, Kınık H. Impact of echocardiography on one-month and one-year mortality of intertrochanteric fracture patients. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2018;52:97-100
  8. Peterson MGE, Allegrante JP, Cornell CN, MacKenzie CR, Robbins L, Horton R, et al. Measuring recovery after a hip fracture using the SF-36 and Cummings scales. Osteoporosis Int 2002;13;296-302
  9. Giessauf C, Glehr M, Bernhardt GA, Seibert FJ, Gruber K, Sadoghi P, et. al. Quality of life after pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a gamma nail: a single center study of 62 pa tients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:214
  10. Yaozeng X, Dechun G, Huilin Y, Guangming Z, Xianbin W. Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail. Injury 2010:41;1234-8 13. Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the sho