Journals / Teknik Dergi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

A Method for Determination of Accident Probability in the Construction Industry

Pages
8537–8561
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In an industry where accidents are recorded according to non-specific standards,it is very difficult to represent the probability of accidents within a known distribution model.The proposed approach in this paper provides an objective method to obtain probabilities byusing the Poisson distribution for construction accidents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Safety issues within the construction industry have been an area of concern in almost everycountry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, an objective and quantitative accident probability calculation approachis proposed using 623 actual construction accidents that resulted in 681 casualties betweenthe years 2000 and 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In an industry where accidents are recorded according to non-specific standards,it is very difficult to represent the probability of accidents within a known distribution model.The proposed approach in this paper provides an objective method to obtain probabilities byusing the Poisson distribution for construction accidents.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Safety issues within the construction industry have been an area of concern in almost everycountry. In this paper, an objective and quantitative accident probability calculation approachis proposed using 623 actual construction accidents that resulted in 681 casualties betweenthe years 2000 and 2013. Of these accidents, the first five account for 84.1% of all fatalitiesand 85.4% of all injuries. In total, five construction jobs (excavation, reinforced concretework, masonry, plastering and painting, and roof work) were the focus of the study, as theyaccount for 70.8% of all occurrences. Probability values were calculated by using the Poissondistribution, in which accident rates and exposure values were used as distributionparameters. In an industry where accidents are recorded according to non-specific standards,it is very difficult to represent the probability of accidents within a known distribution model.The proposed approach in this paper provides an objective method to obtain probabilities byusing the Poisson distribution for construction accidents.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLİR, S., GÜRCANLI, G. E. (2022). A Method for Determination of Accident Probability in the Construction Industry. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 8537–8561. https://ajindex.com/articles/596577

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Statistics – The Poisson Distribution. 02.07.2015.
  2. Retrieved from Kjellen, U., Preventation of accidents through experience feedback. London.GBR: CRC Press, 2000. MS Project, 2013. (retrieved 07.01.13). Primavera P6 Software, 2013. (retrieved 04.02.13). Fine, W. T., & Kinney, W. D. 1971. Mathematical evaluation for controlling hazards. Journal of Safety Research, 3(4), 157−166. Van Geelen, H., Volckaert, A., Sarrazin, R., Janssens, I., 2016. Evolutionary approach of accident concentration zones. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3332 – 3341. Cafisoa, S.,Di Silvestroa, G., Di Guardoa, G., 2012. Application of Highway Safety Manual to Italian divided multilane highways. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 53, 911 – 920. Borsos, A, Cafiso, S., D’Agostino, C., Miletics, D., 2016. Comparison of Italian and Hungarian black spot ranking. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2148 – 2157. Zhang, S., Teizer, J., Lee, J. K., Eastman, C. M., Venugopal, M., 2013. Building information modelling (BIM) and safety: automatic safety checking of construction models and schedules. Automation in Construction, 29,183-195. ILO. 1998. Meeting of Experts on Labour Statistics. Report MELSOI/1998/1, Geneva. Ingstad, O. and Bodsberg, L., 1989. CRIOP: A Scenario - Method for Evaluation of the Offshore Control Centre. SINTEF, Report No. STF75 A89028, Trondheim. OSHA. 1971/97. Recording and reporting occupational injuries and illness. Regulations, Part 1904, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Departmant of Labor, Washington, D.C. Bilir, S., & Gurcanli, G. E. (2016). A Method to Calculate the Accident Probabilities in Construction Industry Using a Poisson Distribution Model. In Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors (pp. 513-523).
  3. Springer, Cham. Bilir, S. (2015). An Activity Based Occupational Safety Risk Assessment Method Integated to The Project Schedule In Construction Projects. (Doctoral dissertation, Institude of Science and Technology). Erginel, N., & TOPTANCI, Ş. (2017). Is Kazası Verilerinin Olasılık Dağılımları İle Modellenmesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5(SI), 201-212.
  4. Birgönül, M. T., & Dikmen, İ. (1996). İnşaat projelerinin risk yönetimi. İMO teknik Dergi, 7(4), 1305-1326.
  5. Woodruff, J. M. 2005. Consequence and likelihood in risk estimation: A matter of balance in UK health and safety risk assessment practice. Safety Science, 43(5), 345- 353. Casanovas, M. M., Armengou,J., Ramos, G. 2014. Occupational risk ındex for assessm