Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Exploring distinct binding site regions of $beta_2$-adrenergic receptor via coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations

Pages
449–463
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall 3-dimensional structure was well preserved throughout the simulation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:$beta_2$ -Adrenergic receptor ($beta_2$ AR) is a G protein-coupled receptor that is highlyexible and able to recognize a wide range of ligands through its conformational variations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The system was composed of $beta_2$AR embedded into a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylcholine membrane bilayer with surrounding water.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall 3-dimensional structure was well preserved throughout the simulation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

$beta_2$ -Adrenergic receptor ($beta_2$ AR) is a G protein-coupled receptor that is highlyexible and able to recognize a wide range of ligands through its conformational variations. Active and inactive conformations revealed by recent crystallographic experiments do not provide a complete dynamic picture of the receptor, especially in the binding site. In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation through a residue-based coarse-grained model is used as an alternative and e cient method to explore a wider conformational search space. The system was composed of $beta_2$AR embedded into a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylcholine membrane bilayer with surrounding water. A total of 6 s of simulation at constant NPT was performed for a system of 6868 coarse-grained beads. The system reached equilibrium at around 0.1s. The overall 3-dimensional structure was well preserved throughout the simulation. Local residue-baseductuations were in good agreement with fully atomistic MD simulations. Four distinct snapshots were selected and reverse-mapped to all-atom representations with around 65,000 atoms. Each reverse-mapped system was later subjected to 100 ns of MD simulation for equilibration. Root mean square deviation clustering analysis yielded distinct receptor conformers for the binding site regions, which were suggested to be alternative representations of the binding pocket and thus were proposed as plausible targets in docking-based virtual screening experiments for the discovery of novel antagonists.

🔖

Cite This Article

GAN, E. D. A., ÇAKAN, S. (2022). Exploring distinct binding site regions of $beta_2$-adrenergic receptor via coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 449–463. https://ajindex.com/articles/595487

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Wallin, E.; von Heijne, G. Protein Sci. 1998, 7, 1029-1038
  2. Nilsson, J.; Persson, B.; von Heijne, G. Proteins 2005, 60, 606-616
  3. Cherezov, V.; Rosenbaum, D. M.; Hanson, M. A.; Rasmussen, S. G. F.; Thian, F. S.; Kobilka, T. S.; Choi, H. J.; Kuhn, P.; Weis, W. I.; Kobilka, B. K.; Stevens, R. C. Science 2007, 318, 1258-1265
  4. White, S. H. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1948-1949
  5. Lindahl, E.; Sansom, M. S. P. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2008, 18, 425-431
  6. Spijker, P.; van Hoof, B.; Debertrand, M.; Markvoort, A. J.; Vaidehi, N.; Hilbers, P. A. J. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2393-2420
  7. Vaidehi, N.; Floriano, W. B.; Trabanino, R.; Hall, S. E.; Freddolino, P.; Choi, E. J.; Zamanakos, G.; Goddard, W.A. 3rd. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 12622-12627
  8. Freddolino, P. L.; Kalani, M. Y. S.; Vaidehi, N.; Floriano, W. B.; Hall, S. E.; Trabanino, R. J.; Kam, V. W. T.; Goddard, W. A. 3rd. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004, 101, 2736-2741
  9. Kalani, M. Y. S.; Vaidehi, N.; Freddolino, P. L.; Hall, S. E.; Trabanino, R. J.; Floriano, W. B.; Kam, V. W. T.; Kalani, M. A.; Goddard, W. A. 3rd. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004, 101, 3815-3820
  10. Nielsen, S. O.; Lopez, C. F.; Srinivas, G.; Klein, M. L. Biophys. J. 2004, 87, 2107-2115
  11. Bond, P. J.; Holyoake, J.; Ivetac, A.; Khalid, S.; Sansom, M. S. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 157, 593-605
  12. Treptow, W.; Marrink, S. J.; Tarek, M. J. Phys. Chem. B Letters 2008, 112, 3277-3282
  13. Jogini, V.; Roux, B. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 3070-3082
  14. Freites, J. A.; Tobias, D. J; White, S. H. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, L90-L92
  15. DeMille, R. C; Cheatham, T. E.; Molinero, V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 132-142.