SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Investigations on resistance and resistance mechanisms of different populations of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) against two selective acaricide

Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)' nin değişik populasyonlarının iki selektif akarisite karşı duyarlılıkları ve duyarlılık mekanizmaları üzerinde araştırmalar

Recep AY
M. Oktay GÜRKAN
Pages
217–223
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Resistance ratios were determined by comparing the samples with standard susceptible strain, GSS, and for dicofol and bromopropylate were found to be 1.112-2.497 and

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nine different populations of Tetranychus urticae Koch were collected on cotton from Adana, Antalya, Izmir and Urfa.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their response against two selective acaricide (dicofol ve bromopropylate) was investigated using both conventional bioassay and biochemical assays. $LC_{50}$ and $LC_{90}$ values of dicofol and bromopropylate were determined for all populations using residual bioassay (petri dish-spray tower).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Resistance ratios were determined by comparing the samples with standard susceptible strain, GSS, and for dicofol and bromopropylate were found to be 1.112-2.497 and
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nine different populations of Tetranychus urticae Koch were collected on cotton from Adana, Antalya, Izmir and Urfa. Their response against two selective acaricide (dicofol ve bromopropylate) was investigated using both conventional bioassay and biochemical assays. $LC_{50}$ and $LC_{90}$ values of dicofol and bromopropylate were determined for all populations using residual bioassay (petri dish-spray tower). Resistance ratios were determined by comparing the samples with standard susceptible strain, GSS, and for dicofol and bromopropylate were found to be 1.112-2.497 and

Özet

Adana, Antalya, İzmir ve Urfa'dan pamuk üzerinden toplanan 9 farklı Tetranychus urticae Koch populasyonunun iki selektif akarisite (dicofol ve bromopropylate) karşı duyarlılığı biyoassay ve biyokimyasal yöntemlerle incelenmiştir. Rezidü biyoassay (petri kabı-ilaçlama kulesi) ile dicofol ve bromopropylate uygulanarak tüm populasyonlarda $LC_{50}$ ve $LC_{90}$ değerleri belirlenmiştir. Standart hassas (GSS) populasyon ile karşılaştırılarak bulunan direnç oranlarının dağılımı dicofol ve bromopropylate için sırasıyla 1.112-2.497 ve

🔖

Cite This Article

AY, R., GÜRKAN, M. O. (2022). Investigations on resistance and resistance mechanisms of different populations of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) against two selective acaricide. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 217–223. https://ajindex.com/articles/595275

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Brown, A. W. A. 1958. Insecticide Resistance in Artropods. W.H.O., 240p. Genewe. Bennett, A. L, A. Claassen and C. L. N. Du Toit. 1997. Esterase activity as an indicator of relative insecticide resistance in Aphis gossypii (Glover) (Homoptera: Aphididae). African Plant Protection 3 (1): 11-16.
  2. Campos, F., D. A. Krupa and R. Jansson. 1997. Evaluation of petri plate assay for assessment of abamectin susceptibility in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 90 (3): 742-746.
  3. Dennehy, T. J., J. Granett and T. Leigh. 1983. Relevance of slide-dip and residual biyoassay comparisons to detection of resistance in spider mites. J. Econ. Entomol., 76: 1225-J230. Dennehy, T. J., E. E. Grafton-Cardwell, J. Granett and K. Barbour. 1987. Practitioner-assesable biyoassay for detection of dicofol resistance in spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 80 (5): 998-1003.
  4. Dennehy, T. J., J. P. Nyrop, W. P. Reissig and R. W. Weires. 1988. Characterization of to dicofol in spider mites (Acari:, Tetranychidae) from New York apple orchards. J. Econ. Entomol., 81 (6): 1551-1561.
  5. Dennehy, T. J., A. W. Farnham and I. Denholm. 1993. The microimmersion bioassay: a novel method for the topical application of pesticides tq spider mites. Pestic. Sci. 39: 47-54.
  6. Fergusonrkolmes, L A., J. G. Scot and T. J. Dennehy. 1991. Dicofol resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): Cross-resistance and Pharmacokinetics. J. Econ. Entomol., 84(1): 41-48.
  7. Ffrench-Constarit, R. H. and R. T, Roush. 1990. Ressistance detection and documentation: the relative roles of pesticidal and biochemical assays. Pesticide Resistance in Arthropads (eds. By Roush and Tabashnik). Chapman and Hall, 303p;New York, Guerrero, F. D., J.H Pruett, S. E. Kunz and D. M. Kammlah. 1999. Esterase Profiles of diazinon-susceptible and -resistant Horn flies (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 92 (2): 286-292.
  8. Hoskins, W. M. 1959. Factors involved in the development of resistance to insecticide and some measures to reduce its effect. Reprinted from Mosquito News, Vol.19, no.2. Hoskins, W. M. 1960. Use of the dosage-mortality curve in quantitative estimination of insecticide resistance. Miscellaneous Publication of the Entomological Society of America, 2(1): 85-91.
  9. Herron, G. A., V. E. Edge, L J. Wilson and J. Rophail.1998. Organophosphate resistance in spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) from cotton in Australia. Experimental & Applied Acarology, 22:17-30.
  10. Kabir, K. H. and R. B. C