Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

The effect of canola meal on growth, somatic indices and body composition of angel fish (Pterophyllum scalare lichtenstein 1823)

Kanola küspesinin melek balığının (Pterophyllum scalare lichtenstein 1823) büyüme, somatik indeksler ve vücut kompozisyonuna etkileri

Pages
181–187
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The experimental results showed that the best weight gain and specific grow rate were found for control and 8% canola meal diets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, effects of substituting different levels of canola meal for fish meal on growth, feed conversion ratio (FCR), somatic indices and body compositions of the angel fish fries were determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Isocaloric (3500 kcal/kg digestible energy) and isonitrogenic (44% crude protein) six experimental diets were formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of angel fish.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The experimental results showed that the best weight gain and specific grow rate were found for control and 8% canola meal diets.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, effects of substituting different levels of canola meal for fish meal on growth, feed conversion ratio (FCR), somatic indices and body compositions of the angel fish fries were determined. Isocaloric (3500 kcal/kg digestible energy) and isonitrogenic (44% crude protein) six experimental diets were formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of angel fish. Canola meal was substituted as rates of 0%, 8%, 16%, 24%, 32% and 40% dietary crude proteins of fish meal (45.52%) in control diet. Four hundred fifty angel fish were distributed to six experimental groups with three replicates. The experimental results showed that the best weight gain and specific grow rate were found for control and 8% canola meal diets. These criterions were reduced (P0.05). As a conclusion, it was suggested that the canola meal can replace up to 16% of dietary fish meal protein without adverse effects in angel fish fry diets.

Özet

Çalışmada balık unu yerine farklı oranlarda kanola küspesi ilavesinin melek balığı yavrularının (P. scalare) büyüme, yem değerlendirme, somatik indeksler ve vücut kompozisyonu üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Melek balığının besin ihtiyaçlarına göre izonitrojenik (%44 protein) ve izokalorik (3500 kcal/kg) 6 deneme yemi formüle edilmiştir. Kontrol yemindeki balık unu proteini yerine (%45,52) yemlere %0, %8, %16, %24, %32, %40 kanola küspesi ilave edilmiĢtir. 450 adet melek balığı 6 deneysel gruba 3 tekerrürlü olarak dağıtılmıştır. Denemenin sonunda en iyi ağırlık artışı ve spesifik büyümenin kontrol grubu ve %8 kanola küspesi yemlerinde bulunduğu görülmüştür. %8’ den daha fazla kanola küspesi ilave edildiğinde bu değerler önemli düzeyde düşmüştür (P0,05). Kanola küspesinin ilavesi arttıkça, balık eti ham protein ve ham yağ içeriğinde azalma eğilimi meydana gelmiştir (P>0,05) . Sonuç olarak melek balığı yavru yemlerinde herhangi bir olumsuz etkisi olmaksızın balık unu proteininin %16’sı yerine kanola küspesinin ilavesi önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, F., ÖLMEZ, M. (2022). The effect of canola meal on growth, somatic indices and body composition of angel fish (Pterophyllum scalare lichtenstein 1823). Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 181–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/595160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abdulaziz, G.M., M.A. El-Nady, A.S. Shalaby and S.H. Mahmoud. 1999. Partial substitution of soybean meal protein by different plant protein sources in diets for Nile tilapia fingerlings. Bull. of Faculty Agriculture University of Cario 50: 189-202.
  2. Adelizi, P.D., R.R. Rosati, K. Warner, Y.V. Wu, T.R. Muench, M.R. White and P.B. Brown. 1998. Evaluation of fish-meal free diets for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture Nutrition 4: 255-262.
  3. Albrektsen, S., H. Mundheim and A. Aksnes. 2006. Growth, feed efficiency, digestibility and nutrient distiribition in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fed two diffrent fish meal qualities at three dieatary levels of vegatable protein sources. Aquaculture 261: 626-640.
  4. Bobadilla, A.S., S.P. Llopis, P.G. Requeni, F. Medale, S. Kaushik and J.P. Sanchez. 2005. Effect of fish meal replacement by plant protein sources on non-specific defence mechanisms and oxidative stres in gilthead Sea bream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture 249: 387–400.
  5. Chong, A. 2003. Assesment of soybean meal in diets for Discus (Symphysodon aequifasciata HECKEL) farming through a fish meal replacement study. Aquaculture Research 34: 913-922.
  6. Çetinkaya, O. 1995.
  7. Balık Besleme, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fak. Yayınları 137, Van Davies S.J., S. Mc Connell and R.I. Bateson. 1990. Potential of rapeseed meal as alternative protein source in complete diets for tilapia (Oreocromis mossambicus Peters) Aquaculture 87: 145-154.
  8. Degani, G. 1993. Growth and body composition of juveniles of Pterophyllum scalare (Lichtenstein) (Pisces; Cichlidae) at different densities and diets. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 24: 725-730.
  9. El Sayed, A.M. 1990. Long-term evaluation cottonseed meal as a protein source for Nile Tilapia, (O. niloticus ). Aquaculture 84: 315-320. FAOSTAT 1999. Agricultural data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://apps.fao.org/default.htm. Accessed September 29, 1999.
  10. Francis G., H.P.S. Makkar and K. Becker. 2001. Antinutritional factors present in plant-derived alternate fish feed ingredients and their effects in fish. Aquaculture 199: 197-227.
  11. Gaber, M.M. 2006. Partial and complete replacement of fish meal by broad bean meal in feeds for Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, L., fry. Aquaculture Research 37: 986-993.
  12. Gakkaishi, N.S. 1993. Alternative protein source for fish meal in diets of young yellowtail. Bull. Japan Science Fisheries 59 (1): 37-143.
  13. Hernandez, M.D., F.J. Martinez, M. Jover and B.G. Garcia. 2007. Ef