SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Trakya bölgesindeki tüketicilerin gıda güvenliği konusunda bilgi, uygulama ve davranışlarındaki farklılıklar

Consumer food safety knowledge, practices and differences in behaviors in thrace region of Turkey

Emine YILMAZ
Gökhan UNAKITAN
Yasemin ORAMAN
İsmail Hakkı İNAN
Pages
279–287
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

F 1 group (consciousness of food content, appropriate preparationand buying consciously) and F 3 group (quality and cost) have been determined as statistically signifcant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the expectations of individuals living in urban and rural regions of Thrace Region of Turkey wereinvestigated by considering the level of knowledge and behaviour of those individuals about parameters, consumptivehabits and food safety while they are buying food products.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study has been conducted in Thrace Region by faceto face survey with 770 individuals who have an effective say in the decision of food consumption within the familyThe factors affecting the consumers in being knowledgeable about food safety were analyzed with Logit model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:F 1 group (consciousness of food content, appropriate preparationand buying consciously) and F 3 group (quality and cost) have been determined as statistically signifcant.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the expectations of individuals living in urban and rural regions of Thrace Region of Turkey wereinvestigated by considering the level of knowledge and behaviour of those individuals about parameters, consumptivehabits and food safety while they are buying food products. This study has been conducted in Thrace Region by faceto face survey with 770 individuals who have an effective say in the decision of food consumption within the familyThe factors affecting the consumers in being knowledgeable about food safety were analyzed with Logit model. Basedon analyses results, the variables of gender, town-city and education were determined as statistically signifcant andcoherent with the expectations of coeffcients of slope. F 1 group (consciousness of food content, appropriate preparationand buying consciously) and F 3 group (quality and cost) have been determined as statistically signifcant.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Trakya Bölgesinde kentsel ve kırsal kesimde yaşayan bireylerin gıda ürünleri satın alırken dikkat ettikleriparametreler, tüketim alışkanlıkları ve gıda güvenliği ile ilgili sağlık riskleri karşısında bilgi düzeyleri ve tutumlarıincelenerek beklentilerinin neler olduğu ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışma, Trakya Bölgesinde, ailede gıda tüketimkararında etkili olan 770 birey ile yüz yüze görüşülerek yapılmıştır. Tüketicilerin gıda güvenliği hakkında bilgi sahibiolmalarında etkili olan faktörler Logit model ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucuna göre cinsiyet, köy-şehir ve eğitimdeğişkenleri istatistikî olarak anlamlı ve eğim katsayılarının beklentilere uyumlu oldukları tespit edilmiştir. F 1 grubu (gıdaiçeriği bilinci, uygun hazırlama ve bilinçli satın alma) ve F (kalite ve fyat) grubu istatistikî olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, E., UNAKITAN, G., ORAMAN, Y., İNAN, İ. H. (2022). Trakya bölgesindeki tüketicilerin gıda güvenliği konusunda bilgi, uygulama ve davranışlarındaki farklılıklar. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 279–287. https://ajindex.com/articles/595054

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Albert J A (1995). Food safety knowledge and practices of consumers in the USA. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics 19: 119–134 Bruhn C M & Schutz H G (1999). Consumer food safety knowledge and practices, Journal of Food Safety 19: 73–87 Dölekoğlu C Ö (2002). Tüketicilerin İşlenmiş Gıda Ürünlerinde Kalite Tercihleri, Sağlık Riskine Karşı Tutumları ve Besin Bileşimi Konusunda Bilgi Düzeyleri (Adana Örneği). Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarım Ekonomisi ABD (Basılmamış), Adana Etiler N (2001). Gıda Hijyeni. Sağlık ve Toplum Dergisi 3: 6-12 FAO/WHO (2009). Assuring food safety and quality: guidelines for strengthening national food control systems http://www. who. int/foodsafety/publications/ capacity/en/Englsih_Guidelines_Food_control. pdf>. (Retrieved 05.11.09) Garayoa R, Cordoba M, Garcia-Jalon I, Sanchez- Villegas A, & Vitas A I (2005). Relationship between consumer food safety knowledge and reported behavior among students from health sciences in one region of Spain. Journal of Food Protection 68 (12): 2631-2636
  2. Gilbert L C (2000). The functional food trend: what’s next and what American think about eggs. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 19 (5): 507-512
  3. Greene W (1997). Econometric Analysis, 3 rd ed., New Jersey, Prentice-Hall: pp.886-887
  4. Gujarati N D (1999). Temel Ekonometri. Çeviren: Şenesen Ü, Şenesen G G, Literatür yayıncılık, İstanbul Henson S & Traill B (1993). The demand for food safety: market imperfections and the role of government. Food Policy 18 (2): 152–162 IFIC (2000). International food information council functional foods attitudinal research. http://www.ifc. org (Retrieved: 10.01.2012)
  5. İşyar Y (1994). Ekonometrik Modeller. Uludağ Üniversitesi Basımevi, Bursa Morrone M & Rathburn A (2003). Health education and food safety behavior in the university setting. Journal of Environmental Health 65: 9–15 Newbold P (2007). İşletme ve İktisat için İstatistik. Literatür Yayınları,
  6. İstanbul Oraman Y, Yılmaz E, & İnan İ H (2009). Consumers’ Food Scares and Trust: A Thrace Regıon Study, International Conference on Sustaınable Development In Southeast Europe (BENA). 16-18
  7. June, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey Özdamar K (2004). Paket Programlar İle İstatiksel Veri Analizi. Kaan Kitapevi, Genişletilmiş 5. Baskı,
  8. Ankara Özer H (2004). Nitel Değişkenli Ekonometrik Modeller: Teori ve Bir Uygulama. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara Pett M A, Lackey N R & Sullivan J J (2003). Making Sense of Factor A