Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

Selective CO methanation over CeO 2 ZrO 2 -composed NiO and Co 3 O 4 catalysts

Pages
568–580
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, 22.3% CH 4 was formed and the CO level decreased below 100 ppm at 200C during the selective CO methanation activity test over this catalyst.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:CeO 2 ZrO 2 -composed NiO and Co 3 O 4 catalysts were prepared by 3 different methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All catalysts were prepared by (1) co-precipitation, (2) surfactant- assisted co-precipitation, and (3) surfactant-assisted co-precipitation with ultrasound mixing methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, 22.3% CH 4 was formed and the CO level decreased below 100 ppm at 200C during the selective CO methanation activity test over this catalyst.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

CeO 2 ZrO 2 -composed NiO and Co 3 O 4 catalysts were prepared by 3 different methods. Both CO methana- tion and selective CO methanation were carried out. All catalysts were prepared by (1) co-precipitation, (2) surfactant- assisted co-precipitation, and (3) surfactant-assisted co-precipitation with ultrasound mixing methods. Catalysts were characterized by using N 2 physisorption, XRD, SEM, TEM, and TPR-H 2 techniques. The highest surface area value, uniform pore size distribution, and pores having small diameters were observed for the catalysts prepared by using the surfactant and ultrasound. The NiO/CeO 2 /ZrO 2 prepared by the surfactant-assisted co-precipitation was the most ◦ active catalyst for CO methanation. It gave 50% CO conversion to CH 4 at 150C and all CO was converted to CH 4 ◦◦ after T > 225C. Moreover, 22.3% CH 4 was formed and the CO level decreased below 100 ppm at 200C during the selective CO methanation activity test over this catalyst.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALIKÇI, F. D., MERCAN, D. E. (2022). Selective CO methanation over CeO 2 ZrO 2 -composed NiO and Co 3 O 4 catalysts. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 568–580. https://ajindex.com/articles/595048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Habazaki, H.; Yamasaki, M.; Zhang, B. P.; Kawashima, A.; Konho, S.; Takai, T.; Hashimoto, K. Appl. Catal. A- Gen. 1998, 172, 131–140. Fujita, S. I.; Takezawa, N. Chem. Eng. J. 1977, 68, 63–68. Xavier, K. O.; Sreekala, R.; Rashid, K. K. A.; Yusuf, K. K. M.; Sen, B. Catal. Today 1999, 49, 17–21. Xu, G.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z. G. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 121, 97–107. Galletti, C.; Specchia, S.; Sorocco, G.; Specchia, V. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2007, 5, Article A110. Moretti, E.; Storaro, L.; Talon, A.; Lenarda, M.; Riello, P.; Frattini, R.; Yuso, M. V. M.; Jimenez-Lopez, A.; Rodr ́ıguez-Castellon, E.; Ternero, F.; et al. Appl. Catal. B- Environ. 2011, 102, 627–637. Xu, R.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Zhou, K.; Li, Y. J. Catal. 2006, 237, 426–430. Gomez, L. E.; Tiscornia, I. S.; Boix, A. V.; Miro, E. E. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2012, 37, 14812–14819. Takenaka, S.; Shimizu, T.; Otsuka, K. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2004, 29, 1065–1073. Choudhury, M. B. I.; Ahmed, S.; Shalabi, M. A.; Inui, T. Appl. Catal. A- Gen. 2006, 314, 47–53. Panagiotopoulou, P.; Kondarides, D. I.; Verykios, X. E. Appl. Catal. A- Gen. 2008, 344, 45–54. Zhou, G.; Lu, M.; Gu, F.; Wang, S.; Xiu, Z. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 2706–2709. Streethawong, T.; Yamada, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshikawa, S. J. Mol. Catal. A- Chem. 2005, 241, 23–52. Liu, H.; Ma, Z.; Chu, Y.; Sun, W. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects 2006, 287, 10–15. Laosiripojana, N.; Assabumrungrat, S.; Charojrochkul, S. Appl. Catal. A- Gen. 2007, 327, 180–188. Laosiripojana, N.; Sutthisripok, W.; Assabumrungrat, S. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 127, 31–38. Ganesan, R.; Ham, D. J.; Lee, J. S. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 2576–2579. Yang, H. M.; Chen, Y. C. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. E. 2012, 43, 897–903. Chung, H. T.; Hsiao, H. C.; Weng, H. S. J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2008, 39, 449–455. Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, H. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 2212–2216. Lin, S. S. Y.; Daimon, H.; Ha, S. Y. Appl. Catal. A- Gen. 2009, 366, 252–261. Khaodee, W.; Jongsomjit, B.; Assabumrungrat, S.; Praserthdam, P.; Goto, S. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 548–556. Fischer, N.; Van Steen, E.; Claeys, M. Catal. Today 2011, 171, 174–179. Takeguchi, T.; Furukawa, S.; Inoue, M. J. Catal. 2011, 202, 14–24. Asencios, Y. J. O.; Assaf, E. M. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 106, 247–252. Sing, K. S. W.; Everett, D. H.; Haul, R. A. W.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, R. A.; Rouquerol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry 1985, 57, 603–619. Pavasupree, S.; Ngamsinlapasathi