Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Türkiye’de Seyfe Gölü yüzey su kalitesinin değerlendirilmesinde çok değişkenli istatistiksel analizlerin uygulanması

Application of multivariate statistical analysis in the assessment of surface water quality in Seyfe Lake, Turkey

Pages
152–163
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of Principal Component Analysis, the six factors explained 92.72% of the total variance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Multivariate statistical methods are successfully used in many areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 26 selected parameters were gathered at 11 of the points and evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of Principal Component Analysis, the six factors explained 92.72% of the total variance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Multivariate statistical methods are successfully used in many areas. Cluster Analysis and Principal Component Analysis methods are the most used of these methods. In this study, water quality data prepared for Seyfe Lake were evaluated. For this purpose, principal components and cluster analysis techniques were used. The 26 selected parameters were gathered at 11 of the points and evaluated. The cluster analysis was obtained from three different groups. These sampling points have different physicochemical characteristics and the pollution levels. According to the results of Principal Component Analysis, the six factors explained 92.72% of the total variance. The first factor 29.52%, the second factor 17.89%, the third factor 16.75%, the fourth 13.65%, the fifth 9.73%, and the sixth 5.17% of the cumulative variances explained respectively. Results reveal that sulfate, nitrate, total phosphorus, hardness, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solid, magnesium, potassium, sodium, calcium, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, aluminum, iron, chromium, and lead were the most important parameters used to evaluate changes in water quality of the lake.

Özet

Çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler birçok alanda başarıyla kullanılmaktadır. Kümeleme ve temel bileşenler analiz yöntemleri en çok kullanılan yöntemlerdendir. Bu çalışmada, Seyfe Gölü’nden elde edilen su kalitesi verileri değerlendirildi. Bu amaç için temel bileşenler ve kümeleme analizi kullanıldı. On bir farklı noktadan alınan seçilmiş 26 parametre değerlendirilmiştir. Kümeleme analizi üç farklı gruptan elde edilmiştir. Bu örnekleme noktaları farklı fiziko-kimyasal özelliklere ve kirlilik seviyelere sahiptir. Temel bileşenler analizi sonuçlarına göre, toplam varyansın % 92.72’sini altı faktör açıklamıştır. Kümülatif varyansın % 29.52’sini birinci faktör, % 17.89’unu ikinci faktör, % 16.75’ini üçüncü faktör, % 13.65’ini dördüncü faktör, % 9.73’ünü beşinci faktör ve % 5.17’sini altıncı faktör sırasıyla açıklamıştır. Sonuçlar sülfat, nitrat, toplam fosfor, sertlik, elektriksel iletkenlik, toplam çözünmüş madde, magnezyum, potasyum, sodyum, kalsiyum, biyokimyasal oksijen, kimyasal oksijen, alüminyum, demir, krom ve kurşunun gölün su kalitesindeki değişimlerini değerlendirmek için kullanılan en önemli parametreler olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADAVUT, U., KIYMAZ, S. (2022). Türkiye’de Seyfe Gölü yüzey su kalitesinin değerlendirilmesinde çok değişkenli istatistiksel analizlerin uygulanması. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 152–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/595046

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Atlı H (1996). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Analiz. Akademi matbaası. Ankara AWWA-WPCF (1992). Standart methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18 th Ed. Washington DC. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, 137 pp. Boyacioglu H (2006). Surface water quality assessment using factor analysis. Water SA 32(3): 389–393
  2. DSİ (2004). Kırşehir Seyfe Plain Hydrogeology Report. Kayseri, Turkey Giardino C, Brando V E, Dekker A G, Strombeck N & Candiani G (2007). Assessment of water quality in lake Gorda (Italy) using hyperion. Remote Sensing of Environment 109: 183–195
  3. Kıymaz S (2010).Water resources management of Seyfe Lake wetlands and recommendation for resolve. Journal of New World Sciences Academy 5(2): 174-186. Kuppusamy M R & Giridhar VV(2006). Factor analysis of water quality characteristics including trace metal speciation in the coastal environmental system of Chennai Ennore. Environmental International 32: 174–179
  4. Lee J Y, Cheon J Y, Lee K K, Lee S Y & Lee M H (2001). Statistical evaluation of geochemical parameter distribution in a ground water system contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 1548–1563
  5. Liu CW, Lin K H & Kuo Y M (2003). Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in Blokfoot disease area in Taiwan. Science of the Total Environment 313: 77–89
  6. Madramootoo C, Johnston W R & Willardson L S. (1997). Management of agricultural drainage water quality: Water Reports 13 Mendiguchia C, Moreno C, Galindo-Riano M D & Garcia-Vargas M (2004). Using chemometric tools to assess anthropogenic effects in river water: A case study: Guadalquivir River (Spain). Analytica Chimica Acta 515(1,5): 143–149
  7. Mendeş M (2011). Multivariate Multiple Regression Analysis Based on Principal Component Scores to Study Relationships between Some Pre- and Post- slaughter Traits of Broilers. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 17(1): 77-83
  8. Ouyang Y, Nkedi-Kizza P, Wu Q T, Shinde D & Huang C H. Assessment of seasonal variations in surface water quality. Water Research 40: 3800-3810 Shrestha S & Kazama F (2007). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji River Basin, Japan. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(4): 464–475
  9. Simeonov V, Simeonova P & Tsitouridou R (2004). Chemometric quality assessment of surface waters: two case studies. Chemical and Engineering Ecology 11(6)