Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Effect of Purpureocillium lilacinum on Root Lesion Nematode, Pratylenchus thornei

Pages
323–328
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, present findings suggest that the exploitation of the biocontrol agent P. lilacinum could be helpful for effective management of the root lesion nematode P. thornei.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Wheat (Triticum spp.) is highly susceptible to the root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus thornei, which causes excessive amounts of crop losses each year.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three doses of P. lilacinum (106 , 107 and 108 conidia cultures mL-1) with one dose of 400 P. thornei individuals (adults and juveniles) mL-1 were applied in 100 cm3 soil under greenhouse conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, present findings suggest that the exploitation of the biocontrol agent P. lilacinum could be helpful for effective management of the root lesion nematode P. thornei.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum spp.) is highly susceptible to the root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus thornei, which causes excessive amounts of crop losses each year. In this research, we investigated the cumulative effect of the biocontrol agent Purpureocillium lilacinum (syn: Paecilomyces lilacinus) against P. thornei. Three doses of P. lilacinum (106 , 107 and 108 conidia cultures mL-1) with one dose of 400 P. thornei individuals (adults and juveniles) mL-1 were applied in 100 cm3 soil under greenhouse conditions. The number of nematodes in the soil and root in addition to total nematode in soil+root were determined. Moreover, different plant parameters such as the plant height, plant fresh and dry weight, root fresh and dry weight were evaluated. Applications with the higher dose of bio-agents (100 cm3 P. thornei infested soil with 108 conidia culture of P. lilacinum mL-1) exhibited maximal enhancement in dry and fresh weight of shoot and reduced P. thornei population. As a consequence, P. lilacinum individually was highly effective in enhancing different plant parameters and suppressing P. thornei reproduction. Overall, present findings suggest that the exploitation of the biocontrol agent P. lilacinum could be helpful for effective management of the root lesion nematode P. thornei.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKTAY, H., KEPENEKCİ, İ., İMREN, M., OKSAL, E., BOZBUĞA, R. (2022). Effect of Purpureocillium lilacinum on Root Lesion Nematode, Pratylenchus thornei. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 323–328. https://ajindex.com/articles/594890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Toktay H (2008). Resistance of spring wheat against Pratylenchus thornei Sher Et Allen (Tylenchida: Pratylenchidae). PhD Thesis, Cukurova University (Unpublished), Turkey Thompson J P & Clewett T G (1986). Research on root lesion nematode: Occurrence and wheat varietal reaction. Queensland Wheat Research Institute Biennial Report pp. 32-35
  2. Thomason I J (1987). Challenges facing nematology: Environmental risk with nematicide and the need for new approaches. In: Veech J A & Dickson D W (Eds.), Vistas on Nematology, Society of Nematologists, Hyattsville, USA, pp. 469-476
  3. Stirling G R (2011). Suppressive biological factors influence populations of root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus thornei) on wheat in vertosols from the Northern grain-growing region of Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 40: 416-429
  4. SPSS (1999). SPSS for Windows, release 10.0.1. Chicago, USA Stirling G R (1991). Biological Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes. CAB International, Brisbane, AU, pp. 282 Smiley R W (2010). Root-Lesion Nematodes: Biology and management in pacific Northwest wheat cropping systems. PNW Extension Bulletin 617, pp. 9 Rao G V & Malek R B (1973). Effects of nematodetrapping fungi on populations of Pratylenchus penetrans. 2nd International Congress of Plant Pathology, 5-12
  5. September, USA, pp. 486-487
  6. Orion D, Amir J & Krikun J (1984). Field observations on Pratylenchus thornei and its effect on wheat under arid conditions. Revue Nematology 7(4): 341-345
  7. Nicol J M (2002). Important nematode pests of cereals. In: Curtis, B C Rajaram S & Macpherson G (Eds.) Bread Wheat: Improvement and production. FAO Plant Production and Protection Series, Roma, IT, pp. 567 Morgan-Jones G, White J F & Rodriguez-Kabana R (1984). Phytonematoda pathology; parasitism of Meloidiogyne arenaria eggs and larvae by Paecilomyces lilacinus. Nematropica 14: 57-71
  8. Moody E H, Lownsbery B F & Ahmed J M (1973). Culture of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus vulnus on carrot disks. Journal of Nematology 5: 225-226
  9. Mendoza A R, Sikora R A & Kiewnick S (2007). Influence of Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 on the biological control of the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis in Banana. Nematropica 37: 203-213
  10. Mai W F, Bloom J R & Chert T A (1977). Biology and Ecology of the Plant-Parasitic Nematode Pratylenchus penetrans, Pennsylvania State University, USA, pp. 64 Luangsa-Ard J, Houbraken J, Van Doorn T, Hong S B, Borman A M, Hywel-Jones N L & Samson R A (2011). Purpureocillium, a new genus for the me