SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of Soil Quality Index for Tea Cultivated Soils in Ortaçay Micro Catchment in Black Sea Region

Orhan DENGİZ
Ali İMAMOĞLU
Fikret SAYGIN
Serkan İÇ
Pages
42–53
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that 25% ofthe soil samples studied had weak quality level, whereas 75%were in moderate SQIw class in terms of tea requirements ofthe soil quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this research was to determine soil qualityby taking into consideration the integrated Soil Quality Index(SQIw) model on tea plantations located in Ortaçay MicroCatchment of Rize.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 22 soil qualityindicators were included in the SQIw model by grouping into4 criteria which are; i-soil physical properties, ii- soilchemical properties, iii-macronutrient elements, ivmicronutrient elements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that 25% ofthe soil samples studied had weak quality level, whereas 75%were in moderate SQIw class in terms of tea requirements ofthe soil quality.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine soil qualityby taking into consideration the integrated Soil Quality Index(SQIw) model on tea plantations located in Ortaçay MicroCatchment of Rize. In the SQIw model, soil indicators wereweighted by means of the Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP). Various indicator units were normalized by aStandard Scoring Function. A total of 22 soil qualityindicators were included in the SQIw model by grouping into4 criteria which are; i-soil physical properties, ii- soilchemical properties, iii-macronutrient elements, ivmicronutrient elements. Twenty eight soil samples werecollected from tea cultivated gardens including dominantlyLeptosol and Alisol-Acrisol great soil groups based onFAO/WRB classification. The results indicated that 25% ofthe soil samples studied had weak quality level, whereas 75%were in moderate SQIw class in terms of tea requirements ofthe soil quality.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENGİZ, O., İMAMOĞLU, A., SAYGIN, F., İÇ, S. (2022). Assessment of Soil Quality Index for Tea Cultivated Soils in Ortaçay Micro Catchment in Black Sea Region. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 42–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/594777

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Andrews S S, Karlen D L & Mitchell J P (2002). A comparison of soil quality indices methods for vegetable production system in northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems and& Environment 90: 25-45 Bhushan N & Rai K (2004). Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 172 Bouyoucos G J (1935). The clay ratio as a criterion of soils to erosion. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 27: 738-751
  2. Bouyoucos G J (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal 43: 435-438
  3. Baskan O, Dengiz O & Demirag İ T (2017). The land productivity dynamics trend as a tool for land degradation assessment in a dryland ecosystem. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189 (212): 3-21 Candemir F & Gülser C (2011). Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes at clay and loamy sand fields. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42: 13-28
  4. Da Silva A F, Barbosa A P, Zimback C R L, Landim P M B & Soares A (2015). Estimation of croplands using indicator kriging and fuzzy classification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 111: 1-11
  5. Dengiz O, Özyazıcı M A & Sağlam M (2015). Multi-Criteria assessment and geostatistical approach for determination of rice growing suitability sites in Gokirmak catchment. Paddy Water Environment 13: 1-10. DOI 10.1007/s10333- 013-0400-4 Demir Z & Gülser C (2015). Effects of rice husk compost application on soil quality parameters in greenhouse conditions. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 4(3):185-190 Doran J W & Parkin B T (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, WI, USA, pp. 3-21 (SSSA Special Publication No. 35) Doran J W & Jones A J (1996). Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. SSSA Special Publication No. 49. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisc FAO (2008). Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin, No: 19, FAO: Rome, Italy FAO (2009). FAOSTAT-Tea Production 2009; FAO: Rome, Italy Gülser C (2004). A Comparison of some physical and chemical soil quality indicators influenced by different crop species. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 7: 905-911
  6. Gülser C, Kızılkaya R, Aşkın T & Ekberli İ (2015). Changes in Soil Quality by Compost and Hazelnut Husk A