SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1

Pre-Operative Parameters Predicting Hemoglobin Decline Related to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Mithat Eksi
Deniz Noyan Ozlu
Taner Kargi
Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan
Ahmet Haciislamoglu
Serdar Karadag
Selcuk Sahin
Ali Ihsan Tasci
Pages
70–76
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of mean operation time (84.4±7 and 76.2±9.9 min, respectively, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for upper urinary tract stones is a minimally invasive, effective treatment mo- dality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite its high success rates, its potential complications pose a risk.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of mean operation time (84.4±7 and 76.2±9.9 min, respectively, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for upper urinary tract stones is a minimally invasive, effective treatment mo- dality. Despite its high success rates, its potential complications pose a risk. In this study, we aimed to determine the risk factors associated with bleeding which is one of PNL’s most important complications. Methods: The data of patients who underwent PNL between January 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The median reduction in post-operative hemoglobin levels compared to preoperative levels was found to be 1.6 g/dl, which was accepted as the threshold value. The patients with hemoglobin decrease above the threshold were assigned as Group 1, and below the threshold as Group 2. Pre-operative, perioperative data, and stone characteristics of the patients were recorded. Results: 169 patients, 85 patients in Group 1 and 84 patients in Group 2 were included in the study. The mean age of Group 1 was sig- nificantly higher (47.4±7.9 and 32±9.4 years, respectively, p=0.001) Sixteen in Group 1 (18.8%) and six in Group 2 (7, 1%) had a diagno- sis of hypertension (HT) and a significant difference was found (p=0.038). The average stone burden was 2733±1121.3 mm3 in Group 1, and 2326.5±975.6 mm3 in Group 2. It was observed that there was a significantly higher stone burden in Group 1 (p=0.001). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of mean operation time (84.4±7 and 76.2±9.9 min, respectively, p

🔖

Cite This Article

Eksi, M., Ozlu, D. N., Kargi, T., Yavuzsan, A. H., Haciislamoglu, A., Karadag, S., Sahin, S., Tasci, A. I. (2022). Pre-Operative Parameters Predicting Hemoglobin Decline Related to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1, 70–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/594621

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899–906
  2. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:475–82
  3. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complica- tions using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008;53:184–90
  4. Kessaris DN, Bellman GC, Pardalidis NP, Smith AG. Manage- ment of hemorrhage after percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 1995;153:604–8
  5. Akman T, Binbay M, Sari E, Yuruk E, Tepeler A, Akcay M, et al. Fac- tors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: single surgeon experience. J Endourol 2011;25:327–33
  6. Ganpule AP, Shah DH, Desai MR. Postpercutaneous nephroli- thotomy bleeding: aetiology and management. Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:189–94
  7. Keoghane SR, Cetti RJ, Rogers AE, Walmsley BH. Blood transfu- sion, embolisation and nephrectomy after percutaneous nephro- lithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 2013;111:628–32
  8. Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, Duty BD, Moreira DM, Srinivasan AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology 2013;81:1154–9
  9. Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, Opondo D, Daels FP, Labate G, et al; CROES PCNL Study Group. A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2013;190:149–56
  10. Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy's stone score- grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy proce- dures. Urology 2011;78:277–81
  11. Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y, et al. The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. Urology 2012;80:524–8. 12. de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kan- dasami SV, et al; CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutane- ous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:246–55
  12. Basnet RB, Shrestha A, Shrestha PM, Joshi BR. Risk factors for post- operative complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2018;16:79–83. 14. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scar- pa R, et al; CROES PCNL Study Group. The C