Journals / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Frequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings Detected in Internal Acoustic Canal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Audiovestibular Symptoms

Pages
202–211
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All referral clinicians should know well that these audiovestibular symptoms can appear as IFs anywhere in the auditory pathway, and how they should be followed in their clinical approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Retrocochlear pathology associated with audiovestibular symptoms is detected in very few of the patients, and most of the internal acoustic canal magnetic resonance imaging examinations (IAC-MRIs) are either completely normal or include accompanying incidental findings (IFs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A retrospective analysis of 374 serial IAC-MRI scans.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All referral clinicians should know well that these audiovestibular symptoms can appear as IFs anywhere in the auditory pathway, and how they should be followed in their clinical approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Retrocochlear pathology associated with audiovestibular symptoms is detected in very few of the patients, and most of the internal acoustic canal magnetic resonance imaging examinations (IAC-MRIs) are either completely normal or include accompanying incidental findings (IFs). The aim of our study is to reveal the presence and frequency of IFs in IAC-MRIs, together with retrocochlear lesions. In addition, we intend to emphasize the clinical importance of these IFs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 374 serial IAC-MRI scans. Results: Gender distribution: 201 males and 173 females. Age range: 2–82 years. Seventy-two scans (19.25%) were totally normal. Fifteen scans (4.01%) demonstrated only pontocerebellar angle findings (PCAFs). The presence of PCAF and IF was together in 57 scans (15.24%). In 230 (61.50%) of the scans, only IFs were present. The incidence of IFs in all IAC-MRIs was 76.74% (287 of 374). Critical findings that may require clinical further evaluation and examination were present in 34 scans (9.09%). IFs that did not require further examination were observed in 253 scans (67.65%). Conclusion: Various IFs can be detected with IAC-MRI that may cause similar symptoms with PCAF. And unfortunately, some of these IFs may be of very high clinical importance. All referral clinicians should know well that these audiovestibular symptoms can appear as IFs anywhere in the auditory pathway, and how they should be followed in their clinical approach.

🔖

Cite This Article

RESORLU, M., ÖZER, Ş., KARATAĞ, O., EKER, N., ÖZKURT, H., EKER, E., GÜÇLÜ, O. (2022). Frequency and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings Detected in Internal Acoustic Canal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Audiovestibular Symptoms. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 202–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/594592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Papanikolaou V, Khan MH, Keogh IJ. Incidental findings on MRI scans of patients presenting with audiovestibular symptoms. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2010;10:6
  2. Htun HM, Mui SL, Williams C, Hans PS. Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging of the internal auditory meatus performed to investigate audiovestibular symptoms. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:32–6
  3. Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1821–8
  4. Choi KJ, Sajisevi MB, Kahmke RR, Kaylie DM. Incidence of retrocochlear pathology found on MRI in patients with non-pulsatile tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:1730–4
  5. Baird SM, Nguyen K, Bhatia DDS, Wei BPC. Inner ear and retrocochlear pathology on magnetic resonance imaging for sudden and progressive asymmetrical sensorineural hearing loss. ANZ J Surg 2019;89:738–42
  6. Vandervelde C, Connor SE. Diagnostic yield of MRI for audiovestibular dysfunction using contemporary referral criteria: correlation with presenting symptoms and impact on clinical management. Clin Radiol 2009;64:156–63
  7. Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 1999;282:36–9
  8. Mirza S, Malik TH, Ahmed A, Willatt DJ, Hughes DG. Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging screening for cerebellopontine angle tumours. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:750–4
  9. Bos D, Poels MM, Adams HH, Akoudad S, Cremers LG, Zonneveld HI, et al. Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based rotterdam scan study. Radiology 2016;281:507–15
  10. Kalsotra P, Gupta R, Gupta N, Sharma R, Gupta S, Gupta DV. Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with tinnitus. Indian J Otol 2015;21:41–6
  11. Tada Y, Aoyagi M, Tojima H, Inamura H, Saito O, Maeyama H, et al. Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI in Ramsay Hunt syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994;511:170–4
  12. Dumas G, Charachon R, Perret J, Vasdev A, Boulat E, Boubagra K. Gadolinium and contrast medium MRI of the acoustic nerve in patients with meningeal neuritis and acoustico-facial syndrome. [Article in French]. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1998;115:59– 72
  13. Nowé V, De Ridder D, Van de Heyning PH, Wang XL, Gielen J, Van Goethem J, et al. Does the location of a vascular loop in the cerebellopontine angle explain pulsatile and non-pulsatile tinnitus? E