SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Barotrauma treatment performance of fish release devices and its effects on fishing operations

Balık bırakma takımlarının barotravma tedavi performansı ve balıkçılık operasyonlarına etkileri

Aydın Demirci
Ozan Bayraktar
Pages
145–154
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Study results showed that fish release devices were very effective for barotraumatreatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze the barotrauma treatment performance of different fish release devices and its effects on differentfishing operations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Experiments were carried out between September 2017 and April 2018 in the Iskenderun Bay, located in the EasternMediterranean.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Study results showed that fish release devices were very effective for barotraumatreatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the barotrauma treatment performance of different fish release devices and its effects on differentfishing operations. Experiments were carried out between September 2017 and April 2018 in the Iskenderun Bay, located in the EasternMediterranean. Fishing Release Hook (FRH), Fish Release Clamp (FRC) and Fish Release Basket (FRB) were tested in three different fishingactivities, which are longline, hand line and bottom trawl fishery, respectively for Epinephelus aeneus, Epinephelus costae and Nemipterus randalli.They were released into the sea after fishing operations. Study results showed that fish release devices were very effective for barotraumatreatment. The use of FRB is suitable for bottom trawl fishing, while the use of FRH and FRC is more ergonomic in longline and hand line fishery.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı balık bırakma takımlarının barotravma tedavi performansını ve farklı balıkçılık operasyonlarına etkilerini analiz etmektir. Çalışma, Eylül 2017 ile Nisan 2018 arasında Doğu Akdeniz›de yer alan İskenderun Körfezinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, parakete, olta ve dip trol balıkçılığı olmak üzere üç farklı balıkçılık faaliyetinde Balık Bırakma Oltası (BBO), Balık Bırakma Kıskacı (BBK) ve Balık Bırakma Sepeti (BBS) olmak üzere üç adet balık bırakma takımı kullanılmıştır. Epinephelus aeneus, Epinephelus costae ve Nemipterus randalli türlerinin bireyleri balıkçılık operasyonlarından sonra denize bırakılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları balık bırakma takımlarının barotravma tedavisi için çok etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. BBS kullanımı dip trol avcılığına uygunken BBO ve BBK ise parakete ve olta balıkçılığında daha kullanışlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirci, A., Bayraktar, O. (2022). Barotrauma treatment performance of fish release devices and its effects on fishing operations. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 145–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/593560

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Brownscombe, J. W., Danylchuk, A. J., Chapman, J. M., Gutowsky, L. F. & Cooke, S. J. (2017). Best practices for catch-and-release recreational fisheries–angling tools and tactics. Fisheries Research, 3, 693-705. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.04.018 Butcher, P. A., Broadhurst, M. K., Hall, K. C., Cullis, B. R. & Raidal, S. R. (2012). Assessing barotrauma among angled snapper (Pagrus auratus) and the utility of release methods. Fisheries Research, 127, 49-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.04.013 Campbell, M. J., McLennan, M. F. & Sumpton, W. D. (2014). Short-term survival of discarded pearl perch (Glaucosoma scapulare Ramsay, 1881) caught by hook-and-line in Queensland, Australia. Fisheries Research, 151, 206-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.12.005 Condie, H. M., Grant, A. & Catchpole, T. L. (2014). Incentivising selective fishing under a policy to ban discards; lessons from European and global fisheries. Marine Policy, 45, 287-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.001 Cook, K. V., Reid, A. J., Patterson, D. A., Robinson, K. A., Chapman, J. M., Hinch, S. G. & Cooke, S. J. (2019). A synthesis to understand responses to capture stressors among fish discarded from commercial fisheries and options for mitigating their severity. Fish and Fisheries, 20(1), 25-43. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12322 Cooke, S. J., Martins, E. G., Struthers, D. P., Gutowsky, L. F., Power, M., Doka, S. E., Dettmers, J. M., Crook, D. A., Lucas, M. C., Holbrook, C. M. & Krueger, C. C. (2016). A moving target-incorporating knowledge of the spatial ecology of fish into the assessment and management of freshwater fish populations. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(4), 239. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5228-0
  2. Damalas, D. (2015). Mission impossible: Discard management plans for the EU Mediterranean fisheries under the reformed Common Fisheries Policy. Fisheries Research, 165, 96-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.01.006 Demirci, A. & Şimşek, E. (2018). The delayed mortality of discarded sea bream (Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758) in trawl simulation: an experimental appraisal. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 35(3): 237-241. DOI: 10.12714/egejfas.2018.35.3.02 Demirci, A. (2003). Non-Target species and biomass of the Iskenderun Bay. Hatay: M. K. University, Institute of Science and Technology. Graduate Thesis. (In Turkish) Demirci, A., Bayraktar, O., Şimşek, E. & Akar, Ö. (2018). Performance comparison of different release devices for barotrauma treatment during fishing operations. International Co