Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

Distribution of phytoplanktonic species in the sea snot in 2021 in the Marmara Sea

Marmara Denizi’nde 2021 yılında görülen deniz salyası içerisindeki fitoplanktonik türlerin dağılımları

Pages
235–242
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, 5 classes were determined in sea snot.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sea snot, which was seen and reported in the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian Seas in the early 1990s, had been on Turkey's agenda as an environmental massive disaster from the winter months of 2021 until the end of summer in the Sea of Marmara.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results obtained, 5 classes were determined in sea snot.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These are 1 dinoflagellate, 2 Prymnesiosides, 5 diatoms, and 2 cyanobacteria species. 8 toxic planktonic species were detected in sea snot: 1 causing PSP poisoning and 3 of dinoflagellate causing DSP poisoning; 1 of prymnesiophisid that releases ichthyotoxin to the sea environment, and 3 of diatoms that cause ASP poisoning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sea snot, which was seen and reported in the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian Seas in the early 1990s, had been on Turkey's agenda as an environmental massive disaster from the winter months of 2021 until the end of summer in the Sea of Marmara. Due to the magnitude and topicality of the subject, the samples collected from the coastal areas where sea snot is observed in Marmara from January until July were examined. According to the results obtained, 5 classes were determined in sea snot. Species of algae that secrete mucilage, which provides stickiness to the formation, were also been identified in sea snot. These are 1 dinoflagellate, 2 Prymnesiosides, 5 diatoms, and 2 cyanobacteria species. 8 toxic planktonic species were detected in sea snot: 1 causing PSP poisoning and 3 of dinoflagellate causing DSP poisoning; 1 of prymnesiophisid that releases ichthyotoxin to the sea environment, and 3 of diatoms that cause ASP poisoning.

Özet

1990’lı yılların başlarında Adriyatik ve Tiren Denizlerinde görülüp raporlanan deniz salyası, Marmara Denizi’nde 2020 kış aylarından itibaren yaz sonuna kadar bir çevre felaketi olarak Türkiye’nin gündemini oluşturmuştu. Konunun öneminin büyüklüğü ve güncelliği sebebiyle 2021 Ocak ayından itibaren Marmara’da deniz salyası görülen kıyısal bölgelerden Temmuz ayına kadar toplanan örnekler incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre deniz salyası içerisinde planktonik olarak 5 sınıf, bu sınıflara ait 8 tür tespit edilmiştir. Deniz salyasında bulunan, oluşumun yapışkanlığı sağlayan müsilajı salgılayan türler de oluşumun içerisinde tespit edilmiştir. Bunlar; 1 dinoflagellat, 2 prymnesiosid ve 5 diyatome türüdür. Bunlara ilave olarak 2 tür müsilaj salgısı yapan siyonabakteri görüşmüştür. Deniz salyasında 8 toksik planktonik tür müsilaj içerisinde tespit edilmiştir: PSP zehirlenmesine yol açan 1 ve DSP zehirlenmesine yol açan 3 tür dinoflagellat; denize ihtiyotoksin salan 1 tür prymnesiofisid, ASP zehirlenmesine yol açan 3 tür diyatomdur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURGA, L. (2022). Distribution of phytoplanktonic species in the sea snot in 2021 in the Marmara Sea. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 235–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/593476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aktan, Y., A. Dede., & Çiftçi Türetken, P.S., (2008a). Mucilage event associated with diatoms and dinoflagellates in sea of Marmara, Turkey. Harmful Algae News. An IOC Newsletter on toxic algae and algal blooms. The International Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO. No.36. Aktan, Y., İşinibilir, M., Topaloğlu, B., Dede, A., & Çardak, M. (2008b). Mucilage event associated with diatoms and dinoflagellates from the Marmara Sea Turkey. "The Changing Ocean: From Past to Future" The 13th International Conference on Harmful Algae, Hong Kong, China, October 19-21, 2008.
  2. Aktan, Y., & Topaloğlu, B. (2011). First record of Chrysophaeum taylorii Lewis & Bryan and their benthic mucilaginous aggregates in the Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Journal of Black Sea / Mediterranean Environment, 17 (2), 159-170.
  3. Anderson, D. M., Fukuyo, Y., & Matsuoka K. (1995). Cyst Methodologies. In G.M. Hallegraeff, D.M. Anderson, A.D. Cembella (Eds.), Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae, pp.229-249. IOC Manuals and Guides No.33, UNESCO Artüz, L. (2021). Sea snot covering the Sea of Marmara (Marmara Denizini kaplayan deniz salyası). 28 Mayıs 2021.
  4. Express Dergisi, Kış 2021-22. 16/06/2015. Retrived from https://birartibir.org/cesedin-curumesidir-bu/ (in Turkish). Balech, E. (1988). Los Dinoflagelados del Atlantico Sudoccidental. Publicaciones Especiales. Instituto Español de Oceanografía, 1, 223-310
  5. Balkıs N., Atabay H., Türetgen I., Albayrak S., Balkıs H., & Tüfekçi V. (2011). Role of single-celled organisms in mucilage formation on the shores of Buyukada Island (the Sea of Marmara). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 91, 771–781. DOI:10.1017/S0025315410000081 Balkıs, N., Sivri, N., Fraim, N.L., Balcı, M., Durmuş,T., & Sukatar, A. (2013). Excessive growth of Cladophora laetevirens (Dillwyn) Kutzing and enteric bacteria in mats in the Southwestern Istanbul coast, Sea of Marmara. Istanbul University, Faculty of Science Journal of Biology, 72(2): 41-48.
  6. Balkis-Özdelice, N., Durmus, T., & Balci, M., (2021). A preliminary study on the intense pelagic and benthic mucilage phenomenon observed in the Sea of Marmara. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), 8(4): 414-422. DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo. 954787 Bradstock, M., & MacKenzie, L. (1981). The Tasman Bay Slime Story. Catch 81, December: 29-30.
  7. Ben-Tuvia, A. (1973). Man-made changes in the eastern Mediterranean Sea and their effect on the fishery resources. Mar. Biol. 19, 197–203. DOI:10.10