Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Determination of the Difficult Intubation Incidence and its Affecting Factors in Patients Undergoing Septal Deviation Surgery – Prospective Controlled Trial

Septal Deviasyon Ameliyatı Geçirecek Hastalarda Zor Entübasyon İnsidansının ve Etki Eden Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi: Prospektif Kontrollü Çalışma

Pages
1–7
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cormack-Lehanescore and incidence of difficult airway were significantly higher in the Group S than theGroup T (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare the incidence of difficultairway in patients undergoing septal deviation with the incidence of difficult airway in patientsundergoing tympanoplasty and to determine the factors associated with the incidenceof the difficult airway.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Investigation of predisposing factors for difficult airway in patientsundergoing septal deviation surgery was evaluated as a secondary outcome.Methods: A total of 255 participants, 130 patients undergoing septoplasty (study group-Group S) and 125 patients undergoing tympanoplasty (control group-Group T) were includedin this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cormack-Lehanescore and incidence of difficult airway were significantly higher in the Group S than theGroup T (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to compare the incidence of difficultairway in patients undergoing septal deviation with the incidence of difficult airway in patientsundergoing tympanoplasty and to determine the factors associated with the incidenceof the difficult airway. Investigation of predisposing factors for difficult airway in patientsundergoing septal deviation surgery was evaluated as a secondary outcome.Methods: A total of 255 participants, 130 patients undergoing septoplasty (study group-Group S) and 125 patients undergoing tympanoplasty (control group-Group T) were includedin this study. Preoperative airway evaluation was performed using the LEMON protocol.For all patients, the STOP-BANG questionnaire was performed to identify the risk ofObstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS). Cormack-Lehane laryngeal view grades werenoted during laryngoscopy. The definition of difficult intubation was identified according tothe Cormack-Lehane scale (I–II=easy, III–IV=difficult). Additionally, the intubation methodused, number of intubation attempts, use of stylet, cricoid pressure, and usage of airwaywere recorded.Results: There were no unintubated patients in this study population. Cormack-Lehanescore and incidence of difficult airway were significantly higher in the Group S than theGroup T (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu prospektif klinik çalışmanın amacı septal deviasyon ameliyatı geçirecek hastalardaki zor havayolu insidansını timpanoplasti operasyonu geçirecek hastalardaki zor havayolu insidansı ile karşılaştırmak ve zor havayolu insidansına etki eden faktörlerin belirlenmesidir. Septal deviasyon ameliyatı geçirecek hastalardaki zor havayolu için predispozisyon yaratan faktörlerin araştırılması ikincil çıktı olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya septoplasti (çalışma grubu-Grup S) uygulanan 130 hasta ve timpanoplasti (kontrol grubu-Grup T) uygulanan 125 hasta olmak üzere toplam 255 katılımcı dahil edildi. Operasyon öncesi havayolu değerlendirilmesi LEMON protokolü kullanılarak yapıldı. Bütün hastalara uyku apne sendromu (UAS) risk tanısı için STOP-BANG soru testi uygulandı. Laringoskopi sırasında Cormack-Lehane laringeal görüntü dereceleri not edildi. Cormack-Lehane skalasına göre zor havayolu tanımlaması yapıldı (I–II=kolay, III–IV=zor). Ek olarak kullanılan entübasyon yöntemi, entübasyon deneme sayısı, stile kullanımı, krikoid bası ve airway kullanımı kaydedildi. Bulgular: Bu çalışma popülasyonunda entübe edilemeyen hasta olmadı. Cormack-Lehane skoru ve zor havayolu insidansı Grup S’de Grup T’ye göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMİR, L., ALTUN, D., ALİ, A., SUNGUR, M. O., KIRŞAN, N., ÇAMÇI, E. (2022). Determination of the Difficult Intubation Incidence and its Affecting Factors in Patients Undergoing Septal Deviation Surgery – Prospective Controlled Trial. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/592804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Özkırış M, Mutlu C. The incidence of nasal septal deviation in patients admitted to our ENT clinic. J Kartal TR 2010;21:72–6
  2. Linder-Aronson S. Adenoids: their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the dentition: a biometric, rhino-manometric and cephalometro-radiographic study on children with and without adenoids. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1970;265:1–132
  3. Principato JJ. Upper airway obstruction and craniofacial morphology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;104:881–90
  4. Liistro G, Rombaux P, Belge C, Dury M, Aubert G, Rodenstein DO. High Mallampati score and nasal obstruction are associated risks factors for obstructive sleep apnea. Eur Respir J 2003;21:248–52
  5. Lofaso F, Coste A, d’Ortho MP, Zerah-Lancner F, Delclaux C, Goldenberg F, et al. Nasal obstruction as a risk factor for obstructive sleep apneoa syndrome. Eur Respir J 2000;16:639–43
  6. Yang WH, Drouin MA, Herbert M, Mao Y, Karsh J. Nasal obstructions as a risk factor for sleep-disordered breathing. The University of Winsconsin Sleep and Respiratory Research Group. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;99:757–62
  7. Josell SD. Habits affecting dental and maxillofacial growth and development. Dent Clin North Am 1995;39:851–60
  8. Valera FC, Travitzki LV, Mattar SE, Matsumoto MA, Elias AM, Anselmo-Lima WT. Muscular, functional and orthodontic changes in preschool children with enlarged adenoids and tonsils. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:761–70
  9. Singh A, Patel N, Kenyon G, Donaldson G. Is there objective evidence that septal surgery improves nasal airflow? J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:916–20
  10. Virkkula P, Bachour A, Hytönen M, Salmi T, Malmberg H, Hurmerinta K, et al. Snoring Is Not Relieved by Nasal Surgery Despite Improvement in Nasal Resistance. Chest. 2006;129:81–7
  11. Pirsig W. Growth of the deviated septum and its influence on midfacial development. Facial Plast Surg 1992;8:224–32
  12. Hafezi F, Naghibzadeh B, Nouhi A, Yavari P. Asymmetric facial growth and deviated nose: a new concept. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:47–51
  13. Kim YM, Rha KS, Weissman JD, Hwang PH, Most SP. Correlation of asymmetric facial growth with deviated nasal septum. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1144–8
  14. Reed MJ, Dunn MJ, McKeown DW. Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2005;22:99–102
  15. Sagarin MJ, Barton ED, Chng YM, Walls RM; National Emergency Airway Registry Investigators