Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Anatomical Evaluation of the Brain Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging: T1-Weighted Flair Versus T1-Weighted Spin-Echo Pulse Sequences

Pages
280–287
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: SNR values were significantly higher in T1W SE than in T1W FLAIR sequences at the level of the thalamus and posterior fossa (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of T1-weighted (T1W)/FLAIR (fluid attenuation inversion recovery) imaging in routine brain magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation by comparing the T1W spin-echo (SE) sequence with the T1W rapid FLAIR sequence in terms of identifiability of anatomical structures and image quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: T1W SE and T1W rapid FLAIR sequences were qualitatively and quantitatively analysed with regard to the identification of anatomical structures, general image quality and presence of artefacts in 30 healthy cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: SNR values were significantly higher in T1W SE than in T1W FLAIR sequences at the level of the thalamus and posterior fossa (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of T1-weighted (T1W)/FLAIR (fluid attenuation inversion recovery) imaging in routine brain magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation by comparing the T1W spin-echo (SE) sequence with the T1W rapid FLAIR sequence in terms of identifiability of anatomical structures and image quality. Methods: T1W SE and T1W rapid FLAIR sequences were qualitatively and quantitatively analysed with regard to the identification of anatomical structures, general image quality and presence of artefacts in 30 healthy cases. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were determined using the signal intensity values of two sequences from equivalent localisations, including the grey substance, white substance and cerebrospinal fluid at the level of the posterior fossa and thalamus. Results: SNR values were significantly higher in T1W SE than in T1W FLAIR sequences at the level of the thalamus and posterior fossa (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞMUŞ, S. G., AYDOĞMUŞ, E. (2022). Anatomical Evaluation of the Brain Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging: T1-Weighted Flair Versus T1-Weighted Spin-Echo Pulse Sequences. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 280–287. https://ajindex.com/articles/592738

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Naganawa S. The technical and clinical features of 3D-FLAIR in neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2015;14:93–106
  2. Bergamino C, Hoey S, Waller K, Skelly C. Comparison of T1wFLAIR and T1wTSE sequences in imaging the brain of small animals using high-field MRI. Ir Vet J 2019;72:6
  3. Melhem ER, Israel DA, Eustace S, Jara H. MR of the spine with a fast T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:447–54
  4. Motegi S, Shimada T, Hayashi N, Nagase H, Taketomi-Takahashi A, Tsushima Y. Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: deriving the most relevant sequence through real images. Radiol Phys Technol 2017;10:364–75
  5. Zech WD, Schwendener N, Persson A, Warntjes MJ, Riva F, Schuster F, et al. Postmortem quantitative 1.5-T MRI for the differentiation and characterization of serous fluids, blood, CSF, and putrefied CSF. Int J Legal Med 2015;129:1127–36
  6. Azad R, Tayal M, Azad S, Sharma G, Srivastava RK. Qualitative and quantitative comparison of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, magnetization transfer spin echo, and fat-saturation T1-weighted sequences in infectious meningitis. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:973–82
  7. Zhang DS, Qi J. Use of fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences in diagnosis of central nervous system diseases. Radiol Pract (Chin) 2000;15:220–2
  8. Tubridy N, Barker GJ, MacManus DG, Moseley IF, Miller DH. Optimisation of unenhanced MRI for detection of lesions in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of five pulse sequences with variable slice thickness. Neuroradiology 1998;40:293–7
  9. Essig M, Wenz F, Schoenberg SO, Debus J, Knopp MV, Van Kaick G. Arteriovenous malformations: assessment of gliotic and ischemic changes with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI. Invest Radiol 2000;35:689–94
  10. Hittmair K, Mallek R, Prayer D, Schindler EG, Kollegger H. Spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of MR pulse sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1555–65
  11. Zhou ZR, Shen TZ, Chen XR, Peng WJ. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI for intracranial tumors in comparison with post-contrast T1W spin-echo MRI. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006;119:467–73
  12. Zimmerman RA, Gibby WA, Carmody RF. Neuroimaging - Clinical and physical principles. New York: Springer –Verlag; 2000. p. 313– 64
  13. Ercan N, Gultekin S, Celik H, Tali TE, Oner YA, Erbas G. Diag- nostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversi