Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Has the Pandemic Changed the Effectiveness of Pressure Ulcer Care in non-COVID Intensive Care Units? A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Pages
16–40
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that this might be due to the increased patient care needs and the burnout of healthcare staff due to the COVID pandemic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Critically ill patients, such as intensive care patients, are highly vulnerable to pressure ulcers (PUs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the increased workforce brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been changes in the number of patients and the quality of follow-up.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that this might be due to the increased patient care needs and the burnout of healthcare staff due to the COVID pandemic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Critically ill patients, such as intensive care patients, are highly vulnerable to pressure ulcers (PUs). Due to the increased workforce brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been changes in the number of patients and the quality of follow-up. The primary aim of our study is to examine the effects of the first year of the pandemic on pressure ulcer follow-up and treatment strategies for patients hospitalized in non-COVID intensive care units (ICU). The secondary aim is to examine the effect of nutritional support. Methods: The data of 120 patients who were followed up in the non-COVID ICU for at least 2 weeks between January–March 2021(Group 1) and January–March 2020 (Group 2) and followed up with PUs were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to the demographic data and comorbidities of the patients, admission from the nursing home, stages of PUs at admission, changes in stages, and nutritional parameters were recorded. Results: While an increase in the PU stage was detected in 24 patients in Group 1, no increase in the stage of the wound was observed in Group 2 (32.0 vs 0, p=0.000). The transferrin value measured during hospitalization was found to be lower in Group 1 (1.23 vs 1.43, p=0.008). In Group 1, the prealbumin value decreased (0.9 vs 0.2, p=0.008) on day 15 compared with the hospitalization and C-reactive protein value increased. In Group 2, the albumin value was found to be lower (2.5 vs 2.3, p=0.047) on day 15 compared with the day of hospitalization. Conclusion: In the first year of the pandemic, there was an increase in the existing pressure ulcer stage and a decrease in the nutritional status in patients hospitalized in the ICU for non-COVID reasons. We believe that this might be due to the increased patient care needs and the burnout of healthcare staff due to the COVID pandemic.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAARÇOĞLU, K. T., BOMBACI, E., BİLİR, Y., ÇİYİLTEPE, F., DENİZ, E. A. (2022). Has the Pandemic Changed the Effectiveness of Pressure Ulcer Care in non-COVID Intensive Care Units? A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 16–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/592733

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Tayyib N, Coyer F. Effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention strategies for adult patients in intensive care units: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2016;13:432–44
  2. Lima Serrano M, González Méndez MI, Carrasco Cebollero FM, Lima Rodríguez JS. Risk factors for pressure ulcer development in Intensive Care Units: A systematic review. Med Intensiva 2017;41:339–46
  3. Avsar P, Moore Z, Patton D, O’Connor T, Budri AM, Nugent L. Repositioning for preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Wound Care 2020;29:496–508
  4. Jiang Q, Li X, Qu X, Liu Y, Zhang L, Su C, et al. The incidence, risk factors and characteristics of pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients in China. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7:2587–94
  5. WHO. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020. Available at: https://www. who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-sopening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march2020. Accessed Feb 18, 2022
  6. González-Gil MT, González-Blázquez C, Parro-Moreno AI, PedrazMarcos A, Palmar-Santos A, Otero-García L, et al. Nurses’ perceptions and demands regarding COVID-19 care delivery in critical care units and hospital emergency services. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2021;62:102966
  7. Murat M, Köse S, Savaşer S. Determination of stress, depression and burnout levels of front-line nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021;30:533–43
  8. Chen R, Sun C, Chen JJ, Jen HJ, Kang XL, Kao CC, et al. A largescale survey on trauma, burnout, and posttraumatic growth among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021;30:102–16
  9. Caillet A, Coste C, Sanchez R, Allaouchiche B. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on ICU caregivers. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020;39:717–22
  10. Bilir Y, Çabaklı GT, Danacı F, Haydarlar H, Saraçoğlu A, Saraçoğlu KT. How was the healthcare team, working in the COVID intensive care unit affected by the pandemic. Proceedings of the 1st International Health Science University, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Symposium; 2021 Dec 3-4. Istanbul: 2021. p. 67
  11. Saracoglu KT, Simsek T, Kahraman S, Bombaci E, Sezen Ö, Saracoglu A, et al. The psychological impact of COVID-19 disease is more severe on intensive care unit healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2020;18:607–15
  12. Covinsky KE, Covinsky MH, Palmer RM, Sehgal AR. Serum albumin concentration and