Journals / Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16

The Contribution of Saussure's Structural Linguistic Theory to the Methodology of Social Sciences

Saussure'ün Yapısal Dilbilim Kuramının Sosyal Bilimler Metodolojisine Katkısı

Pages
77–92
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And in this paper, also, the possibility of using revolutionary consequences of structural linguistics as a model for social scientific methodology (concerning the discussion on the objectivity of social scientific knowledge regarding the contradiction between the conscious and the unconscious) is discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The central theme in this paper, is the contribution of Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure's structural linguistics (through the rejection of historical analysis and taking language as an integrated system of signs), in the context of the pursuit of objective-scientific knowledge to the methodology of social sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The central theme in this paper, is the contribution of Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure's structural linguistics (through the rejection of historical analysis and taking language as an integrated system of signs), in the context of the pursuit of objective-scientific knowledge to the methodology of social sciences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And in this paper, also, the possibility of using revolutionary consequences of structural linguistics as a model for social scientific methodology (concerning the discussion on the objectivity of social scientific knowledge regarding the contradiction between the conscious and the unconscious) is discussed.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The central theme in this paper, is the contribution of Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure's structural linguistics (through the rejection of historical analysis and taking language as an integrated system of signs), in the context of the pursuit of objective-scientific knowledge to the methodology of social sciences. And in this paper, also, the possibility of using revolutionary consequences of structural linguistics as a model for social scientific methodology (concerning the discussion on the objectivity of social scientific knowledge regarding the contradiction between the conscious and the unconscious) is discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, İsviçreli dilbilimci Ferdinand de Saussure'ün tarihsel analizi reddedişinin ve dili bütünlüklü bir göstergeler sistemi olarak ele alışının sosyal bilimler metodoloj isindeki nesnel - bilimsel bilgi arayışına hangi bağlamlarda katkı yaptığına değinilmiştir. Bununla birlikte yapısal dilbilim çığırının dilbilimde yarattığı devrimci metodolojik gelişmelere ve bu gelişmelerin tüm sosyal bilimler için örnek bir model olup olamayacağına, (bilinç-bilinçdışı tartışması ve sosyal bilimlerin imkânı bağlamında) dilin, dilbilimin yapısal tarzda ele almışının bütün diğer sosyal bilimler için ne gibi bir anlama sahip olduğuna değinilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARLADIR, H. S. (2022). The Contribution of Saussure's Structural Linguistic Theory to the Methodology of Social Sciences. Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16, 77–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/592641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ALTUĞ, Taylan (2001),
  2. Dile Gelen Felsefe, İstanbul:
  3. Yapı Kredi Yay. BİRİKİM (1977), "Dilin ve Toplumun Yapısı", Cilt 5 / Sayı 28- 29, İstanbul:
  4. Birikim Yayınlan. BOTTOMORE, Tom& NISBET, Robert (1997), "Yapısalcılık", Sosyolojik Çözümlemenin Tarihi (Çev: Binnaz Toprak, Yay. Haz: Mete Tunçay& Aydın Uğur), Ankara:
  5. Ayraç Yayınevi.
  6. CASSIRER, Ernst (1980), İnsan Üstüne Bir Deneme (Çev: Necla Arat), İstanbul:
  7. Remzi Kitabevi.
  8. GARDNER, Howard (1973),
  9. The Quest for Mind, Alfred A. Knopf, New York. GLUCKSMANN, Miriam (1979), Structuralist Analysis in Contemporary Social Thought: A Comparison of the Theories of Claude Levi-Strauss and Louis Althusser, London: Routledge& KeganPaul. HAMILTON, Peter (1995), "The Enlightenment and the Birth of Social Science", Modernity (Ed. Stuart Hall Et. AL), Oxford: Polity Press.
  10. JUNG, Carl G. (1982), Bilinç ve Bilinçaltının İşlevi (Çev: Engin Büyükinal), İstanbul:
  11. Say Yay. LEVI-STRAUSS, Claude (1963), Structural Anthropology, (Trans. Claire Jacobson&Brooke G. Schoepf), New York: Basic Books Inc. MAUSS, Marcel (2005), Sosyoloji ve Antropoloji (Çev: Özcan Doğan), Ankara:
  12. Doğu Batı Yay. ROSSI, Ino (1983), From the Sociology of Symbols to the Sociology of Signs: Toward a Dialectical Sociology, New York: Columbia University Press.
  13. SAUSSURE, Ferdinand de (1985), Genel Dilbilim Dersleri (Der: Charles Bally& Albert Sechehaye, Çev. Berke Vardar), Ankara: Birey ve Toplum Yayınları.
  14. SWINGEWOOD, Alan (1998), Sosyolojik Düşüncenin Kısa Tarihi (Çev. Osman Akınhay), Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.